Cargando…

Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?

OBJECTIVE: In a large-scale population cardiovascular screening programme, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and hypertension would ideally be rapidly assessed using a single device. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) is calculated by comparing the ankle and brachial blood pressure (BP). However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janus, Justyna, Nicholls, Jennifer K., Pallett, Edward, Bown, Matthew, Chung, Emma M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283281
_version_ 1784910266172964864
author Janus, Justyna
Nicholls, Jennifer K.
Pallett, Edward
Bown, Matthew
Chung, Emma M. L.
author_facet Janus, Justyna
Nicholls, Jennifer K.
Pallett, Edward
Bown, Matthew
Chung, Emma M. L.
author_sort Janus, Justyna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In a large-scale population cardiovascular screening programme, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and hypertension would ideally be rapidly assessed using a single device. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) is calculated by comparing the ankle and brachial blood pressure (BP). However, it is currently unclear whether brachial BP measurements provided by automated PAD screening systems are sufficiently accurate for simultaneous hypertension screening. METHODS: Two portable PAD screening devices, the MESI ABPI MD and Huntleigh’s Dopplex ABIlity, were evaluated following the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) Revision 2010 using a mercury-free sphygmomanometer as a reference device. RESULTS: On average, the MESI slightly underestimated brachial systolic blood pressure (BP) with a bias and standard deviation (SD) of -3.5 (SD: 3.3) mmHg and diastolic BP with a bias of -1.5 (SD: 2.3) mmHg. For systolic BP estimates, the Dopplex was more accurate than the MESI with a lower bias of -0.5 (SD: 4.2) mmHg but less precise. The MESI successfully fulfilled all the requirements of the ESH-IP for hypertension screening. The Dopplex device failed the ESH-IP due to the absence of DBP measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The MESI device appears to be suitable for simultaneous PAD and hypertension screening as part of a preventative care programme. Huntleigh’s Dopplex ABIlity failed to pass the ESH-IP validation test. Further clinical trials are underway to assess the use of the MESI for simultaneous screening for hypertension and PAD in a population screening setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100300142023-03-22 Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening? Janus, Justyna Nicholls, Jennifer K. Pallett, Edward Bown, Matthew Chung, Emma M. L. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: In a large-scale population cardiovascular screening programme, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and hypertension would ideally be rapidly assessed using a single device. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) is calculated by comparing the ankle and brachial blood pressure (BP). However, it is currently unclear whether brachial BP measurements provided by automated PAD screening systems are sufficiently accurate for simultaneous hypertension screening. METHODS: Two portable PAD screening devices, the MESI ABPI MD and Huntleigh’s Dopplex ABIlity, were evaluated following the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) Revision 2010 using a mercury-free sphygmomanometer as a reference device. RESULTS: On average, the MESI slightly underestimated brachial systolic blood pressure (BP) with a bias and standard deviation (SD) of -3.5 (SD: 3.3) mmHg and diastolic BP with a bias of -1.5 (SD: 2.3) mmHg. For systolic BP estimates, the Dopplex was more accurate than the MESI with a lower bias of -0.5 (SD: 4.2) mmHg but less precise. The MESI successfully fulfilled all the requirements of the ESH-IP for hypertension screening. The Dopplex device failed the ESH-IP due to the absence of DBP measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The MESI device appears to be suitable for simultaneous PAD and hypertension screening as part of a preventative care programme. Huntleigh’s Dopplex ABIlity failed to pass the ESH-IP validation test. Further clinical trials are underway to assess the use of the MESI for simultaneous screening for hypertension and PAD in a population screening setting. Public Library of Science 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10030014/ /pubmed/36943856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283281 Text en © 2023 Janus et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janus, Justyna
Nicholls, Jennifer K.
Pallett, Edward
Bown, Matthew
Chung, Emma M. L.
Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title_full Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title_fullStr Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title_full_unstemmed Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title_short Are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
title_sort are portable ankle brachial pressure index measurement devices suitable for hypertension screening?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283281
work_keys_str_mv AT janusjustyna areportableanklebrachialpressureindexmeasurementdevicessuitableforhypertensionscreening
AT nichollsjenniferk areportableanklebrachialpressureindexmeasurementdevicessuitableforhypertensionscreening
AT pallettedward areportableanklebrachialpressureindexmeasurementdevicessuitableforhypertensionscreening
AT bownmatthew areportableanklebrachialpressureindexmeasurementdevicessuitableforhypertensionscreening
AT chungemmaml areportableanklebrachialpressureindexmeasurementdevicessuitableforhypertensionscreening