Cargando…
Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to synthesize published scholarship that applies policy diffusion—a theory of the policy process that considers the interdependence of government-level public health policy choices. We paid particular attention to the role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process, and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944893 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00752-x |
_version_ | 1784910280956837888 |
---|---|
author | Fundytus, Katrina Santamaria-Plaza, Cristina McLaren, Lindsay |
author_facet | Fundytus, Katrina Santamaria-Plaza, Cristina McLaren, Lindsay |
author_sort | Fundytus, Katrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to synthesize published scholarship that applies policy diffusion—a theory of the policy process that considers the interdependence of government-level public health policy choices. We paid particular attention to the role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process, and to identifying challenges and gaps towards strengthening the intersection of public health, public policy, and political science. METHODS: We systematically searched 17 electronic academic databases. We included English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2021. For each article, we extracted the following information: public health policy domain, geographic setting, diffusion directions and mechanisms, the role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process, and author research discipline. SYNTHESIS: We identified 39 peer-reviewed, primary research articles. Anti-smoking and tobacco control policies in the United States (n = 9/39) were the most common policy domain and geographic context examined; comparatively fewer studies examined policy diffusion in the Canadian context (n = 4/39). In terms of how policies diffuse, we found evidence of five diffusion mechanisms (learning, emulation, competition, coercion, and social contagion), which could moreover be conditional on internal government characteristics. The role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process was unclear, as only five articles discussed this. Policy diffusion theory was primarily used by public policy and political science scholars (n = 19/39), with comparatively fewer interdisciplinary authorship teams (n = 6/39). CONCLUSION: Policy diffusion theory provides important insights into the intergovernmental factors that influence public health policy decisions, thus helping to expand our conceptualization of evidence-informed public health. Despite this, policy diffusion research in the Canadian public health context is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10030077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100300772023-03-22 Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review Fundytus, Katrina Santamaria-Plaza, Cristina McLaren, Lindsay Can J Public Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to synthesize published scholarship that applies policy diffusion—a theory of the policy process that considers the interdependence of government-level public health policy choices. We paid particular attention to the role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process, and to identifying challenges and gaps towards strengthening the intersection of public health, public policy, and political science. METHODS: We systematically searched 17 electronic academic databases. We included English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2021. For each article, we extracted the following information: public health policy domain, geographic setting, diffusion directions and mechanisms, the role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process, and author research discipline. SYNTHESIS: We identified 39 peer-reviewed, primary research articles. Anti-smoking and tobacco control policies in the United States (n = 9/39) were the most common policy domain and geographic context examined; comparatively fewer studies examined policy diffusion in the Canadian context (n = 4/39). In terms of how policies diffuse, we found evidence of five diffusion mechanisms (learning, emulation, competition, coercion, and social contagion), which could moreover be conditional on internal government characteristics. The role of scientific evidence in the diffusion process was unclear, as only five articles discussed this. Policy diffusion theory was primarily used by public policy and political science scholars (n = 19/39), with comparatively fewer interdisciplinary authorship teams (n = 6/39). CONCLUSION: Policy diffusion theory provides important insights into the intergovernmental factors that influence public health policy decisions, thus helping to expand our conceptualization of evidence-informed public health. Despite this, policy diffusion research in the Canadian public health context is limited. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10030077/ /pubmed/36944893 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00752-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fundytus, Katrina Santamaria-Plaza, Cristina McLaren, Lindsay Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title | Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title_full | Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title_short | Policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
title_sort | policy diffusion theory, evidence-informed public health, and public health political science: a scoping review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36944893 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00752-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fundytuskatrina policydiffusiontheoryevidenceinformedpublichealthandpublichealthpoliticalscienceascopingreview AT santamariaplazacristina policydiffusiontheoryevidenceinformedpublichealthandpublichealthpoliticalscienceascopingreview AT mclarenlindsay policydiffusiontheoryevidenceinformedpublichealthandpublichealthpoliticalscienceascopingreview |