Cargando…

Semi-supervised COVID-19 volumetric pulmonary lesion estimation on CT images using probabilistic active contour and CNN segmentation

PURPOSE: A semi-supervised two-step methodology is proposed to obtain a volumetric estimation of COVID-19-related lesions on Computed Tomography (CT) images. METHODS: First, damaged tissue was segmented from CT images using a probabilistic active contours approach. Second, lung parenchyma was extrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez-Obregon, Diomar Enrique, Mejia-Rodriguez, Aldo Rodrigo, Cendejas-Zaragoza, Leopoldo, Gutiérrez Mejía, Juan, Arce-Santana, Edgar Román, Charleston-Villalobos, Sonia, Aljama-Corrales, Tomas, Gabutti, Alejandro, Santos-Díaz, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104905
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: A semi-supervised two-step methodology is proposed to obtain a volumetric estimation of COVID-19-related lesions on Computed Tomography (CT) images. METHODS: First, damaged tissue was segmented from CT images using a probabilistic active contours approach. Second, lung parenchyma was extracted using a previously trained U-Net. Finally, volumetric estimation of COVID-19 lesions was calculated considering the lung parenchyma masks. Our approach was validated using a publicly available dataset containing 20 CT COVID-19 images previously labeled and manually segmented. Then, it was applied to 295 COVID-19 patients CT scans admitted to an intensive care unit. We compared the lesion estimation between deceased and survived patients for high and low-resolution images. RESULTS: A comparable median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.66 for the 20 validation images was achieved. For the 295 images dataset, results show a significant difference in lesion percentages between deceased and survived patients, with a p-value of 9.1 × 10(−4) in low-resolution and 5.1 × 10(−5) in high-resolution images. Furthermore, the difference in lesion percentages between high and low-resolution images was 10 % on average. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach could help estimate the lesion size caused by COVID-19 in CT images and may be considered an alternative to getting a volumetric segmentation for this novel disease without the requirement of large amounts of COVID-19 labeled data to train an artificial intelligence algorithm. The low variation between the estimated percentage of lesions in high and low-resolution CT images suggests that the proposed approach is robust, and it may provide valuable information to differentiate between survived and deceased patients.