Cargando…

Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Alignment goals in total knee replacement (TKR) is a topical subject. This study compares the short-term functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of two philosophies for knee arthroplasty alignment: measured resection (MR) and an individualised alignment philos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waterson, Hugh, Walker, Robert, Koopmans, Petra, Stroud, Rowenna, Phillips, Jonathan, Mandalia, Vipul, Eyres, Keith, Toms, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04487-1
_version_ 1784910365541269504
author Waterson, Hugh
Walker, Robert
Koopmans, Petra
Stroud, Rowenna
Phillips, Jonathan
Mandalia, Vipul
Eyres, Keith
Toms, Andrew
author_facet Waterson, Hugh
Walker, Robert
Koopmans, Petra
Stroud, Rowenna
Phillips, Jonathan
Mandalia, Vipul
Eyres, Keith
Toms, Andrew
author_sort Waterson, Hugh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Alignment goals in total knee replacement (TKR) is a topical subject. This study compares the short-term functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of two philosophies for knee arthroplasty alignment: measured resection (MR) and an individualised alignment philosophy, with the tibia mechanically aligned and an instrumented gap balancer (GB) to align the femur in both flexion and extension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 94 knees were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial. The surgical protocol used a MR technique for mechanical alignment or a GB technique for individualised alignment. Primary outcome was quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes included validated functional tests and PROMs as well as patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in the change from baseline mean quadriceps peak torque between the two groups (p = 0.988). Significant improvement in the change in range of motion (ROM) in the GB group compared to the MR group at 3 months (13° vs 6° p = 0.028) but this improvement was not significant at 1 year (20° vs 17° p = 0.21). The functional test of balance showed statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks (p = 0.03) in the GB group but this difference was not maintained. PROMs favoured the GB group, with the KOOS pain scoring statistically better (p ≤ 0.05) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Individualised alignment philosophy utilising a GB technique did not demonstrate an improvement in the primary outcome measure quadriceps peak torque. Improvement was seen in the GB group in PROM pain scores that was significant, both statistically and clinically, out to at least 1 year. Gains that were seen in functional assessment with GB, although significant at some time points, were no longer significant at 1 year and no difference was seen in quads strength. Compared to a MR technique, the individualised GB technique appears to confer some improvement in pain, ROM and some functional tests following TKR in the short-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100304052023-03-23 Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial Waterson, Hugh Walker, Robert Koopmans, Petra Stroud, Rowenna Phillips, Jonathan Mandalia, Vipul Eyres, Keith Toms, Andrew Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Knee Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: Alignment goals in total knee replacement (TKR) is a topical subject. This study compares the short-term functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of two philosophies for knee arthroplasty alignment: measured resection (MR) and an individualised alignment philosophy, with the tibia mechanically aligned and an instrumented gap balancer (GB) to align the femur in both flexion and extension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 94 knees were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial. The surgical protocol used a MR technique for mechanical alignment or a GB technique for individualised alignment. Primary outcome was quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes included validated functional tests and PROMs as well as patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in the change from baseline mean quadriceps peak torque between the two groups (p = 0.988). Significant improvement in the change in range of motion (ROM) in the GB group compared to the MR group at 3 months (13° vs 6° p = 0.028) but this improvement was not significant at 1 year (20° vs 17° p = 0.21). The functional test of balance showed statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks (p = 0.03) in the GB group but this difference was not maintained. PROMs favoured the GB group, with the KOOS pain scoring statistically better (p ≤ 0.05) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Individualised alignment philosophy utilising a GB technique did not demonstrate an improvement in the primary outcome measure quadriceps peak torque. Improvement was seen in the GB group in PROM pain scores that was significant, both statistically and clinically, out to at least 1 year. Gains that were seen in functional assessment with GB, although significant at some time points, were no longer significant at 1 year and no difference was seen in quads strength. Compared to a MR technique, the individualised GB technique appears to confer some improvement in pain, ROM and some functional tests following TKR in the short-term. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030405/ /pubmed/35690965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04487-1 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee Arthroplasty
Waterson, Hugh
Walker, Robert
Koopmans, Petra
Stroud, Rowenna
Phillips, Jonathan
Mandalia, Vipul
Eyres, Keith
Toms, Andrew
Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial
topic Knee Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04487-1
work_keys_str_mv AT watersonhugh gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walkerrobert gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koopmanspetra gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stroudrowenna gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phillipsjonathan gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mandaliavipul gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eyreskeith gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tomsandrew gapbalancedadjustedmechanicalalignmentversusmeasuredresectionmechanicalalignmentarandomisedcontrolledtrial