Cargando…

Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany

INTRODUCTION: Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutschler, Manuel, Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik, Pfeiffer, Thomas R., Jaecker, Vera, Arbab, Dariusch, Shafizadeh, Sven, Buchhorn, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04423-3
_version_ 1784910371985817600
author Mutschler, Manuel
Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik
Pfeiffer, Thomas R.
Jaecker, Vera
Arbab, Dariusch
Shafizadeh, Sven
Buchhorn, Tomas
author_facet Mutschler, Manuel
Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik
Pfeiffer, Thomas R.
Jaecker, Vera
Arbab, Dariusch
Shafizadeh, Sven
Buchhorn, Tomas
author_sort Mutschler, Manuel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is known about effective applications of different therapeutic methods in day-to-day work. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online-questionnaire, capturing the routine diagnostic workup including clinical examination, radiologic assessment and treatment strategies, was sent to all members of the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU) and Association of Arthroscopic and Joint Surgery (AGA). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel and SPSS. RESULTS: Each question of the questionnaire was on average answered by 431 ± 113 respondents. External rotation stress test (66%), squeeze test (61%) and forced dorsiflexion test (40%) were most commonly used for the clinical examination. In the diagnostic workup, most clinicians relied on MRI (83%) and conventional X-ray analysis (anterior–posterior 58%, lateral 41%, mortise view 38%). Only 15% of the respondents stated that there is a role for arthroscopic evaluation for the assessment of isolated syndesmotic injuries. Most frequently used fixation techniques included syndesmotic screw fixation (80%, 42% one syndesmotic screw, 38% two syndesmotic screws), followed by suture-button devices in 13%. Syndesmotic screw fixation was mainly performed tricortically (78%). While 50% of the respondents stated that syndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button devices are equivalent in the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries with respect to clinical outcome, 36% answered that syndesmotic screw fixation is superior compared to suture-button devices. CONCLUSIONS: While arthroscopy and suture-button devices do not appear to be widely used, syndesmotic screw fixation after diagnostic work-up by MRI seems to be the common treatment algorithm for non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries in Germany.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100304322023-03-23 Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany Mutschler, Manuel Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik Pfeiffer, Thomas R. Jaecker, Vera Arbab, Dariusch Shafizadeh, Sven Buchhorn, Tomas Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery INTRODUCTION: Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is known about effective applications of different therapeutic methods in day-to-day work. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online-questionnaire, capturing the routine diagnostic workup including clinical examination, radiologic assessment and treatment strategies, was sent to all members of the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU) and Association of Arthroscopic and Joint Surgery (AGA). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel and SPSS. RESULTS: Each question of the questionnaire was on average answered by 431 ± 113 respondents. External rotation stress test (66%), squeeze test (61%) and forced dorsiflexion test (40%) were most commonly used for the clinical examination. In the diagnostic workup, most clinicians relied on MRI (83%) and conventional X-ray analysis (anterior–posterior 58%, lateral 41%, mortise view 38%). Only 15% of the respondents stated that there is a role for arthroscopic evaluation for the assessment of isolated syndesmotic injuries. Most frequently used fixation techniques included syndesmotic screw fixation (80%, 42% one syndesmotic screw, 38% two syndesmotic screws), followed by suture-button devices in 13%. Syndesmotic screw fixation was mainly performed tricortically (78%). While 50% of the respondents stated that syndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button devices are equivalent in the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries with respect to clinical outcome, 36% answered that syndesmotic screw fixation is superior compared to suture-button devices. CONCLUSIONS: While arthroscopy and suture-button devices do not appear to be widely used, syndesmotic screw fixation after diagnostic work-up by MRI seems to be the common treatment algorithm for non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries in Germany. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030432/ /pubmed/35403865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04423-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Trauma Surgery
Mutschler, Manuel
Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik
Pfeiffer, Thomas R.
Jaecker, Vera
Arbab, Dariusch
Shafizadeh, Sven
Buchhorn, Tomas
Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title_full Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title_fullStr Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title_short Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
title_sort current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in germany
topic Trauma Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04423-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mutschlermanuel currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT naendrupjanhendrik currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT pfeifferthomasr currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT jaeckervera currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT arbabdariusch currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT shafizadehsven currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany
AT buchhorntomas currentstatusofthemanagementofisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesingermany