Cargando…
Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2 |
_version_ | 1784910378175561728 |
---|---|
author | Flury, Andreas Wild, Linda Waltenspül, Manuel Zindel, Christoph Vlachopoulos, Lazaros Imhoff, Florian B. Fucentese, Sandro F. |
author_facet | Flury, Andreas Wild, Linda Waltenspül, Manuel Zindel, Christoph Vlachopoulos, Lazaros Imhoff, Florian B. Fucentese, Sandro F. |
author_sort | Flury, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique. METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage. RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion—which is of importance in case of revision surgery—an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10030456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100304562023-03-23 Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction Flury, Andreas Wild, Linda Waltenspül, Manuel Zindel, Christoph Vlachopoulos, Lazaros Imhoff, Florian B. Fucentese, Sandro F. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique. METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage. RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion—which is of importance in case of revision surgery—an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030456/ /pubmed/35287180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedic Surgery Flury, Andreas Wild, Linda Waltenspül, Manuel Zindel, Christoph Vlachopoulos, Lazaros Imhoff, Florian B. Fucentese, Sandro F. Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title | Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title_full | Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title_short | Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction |
title_sort | tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring acl reconstruction |
topic | Orthopaedic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fluryandreas tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT wildlinda tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT waltenspulmanuel tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT zindelchristoph tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT vlachopouloslazaros tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT imhoffflorianb tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction AT fucentesesandrof tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction |