Cargando…

Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction

INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flury, Andreas, Wild, Linda, Waltenspül, Manuel, Zindel, Christoph, Vlachopoulos, Lazaros, Imhoff, Florian B., Fucentese, Sandro F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2
_version_ 1784910378175561728
author Flury, Andreas
Wild, Linda
Waltenspül, Manuel
Zindel, Christoph
Vlachopoulos, Lazaros
Imhoff, Florian B.
Fucentese, Sandro F.
author_facet Flury, Andreas
Wild, Linda
Waltenspül, Manuel
Zindel, Christoph
Vlachopoulos, Lazaros
Imhoff, Florian B.
Fucentese, Sandro F.
author_sort Flury, Andreas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique. METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage. RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion—which is of importance in case of revision surgery—an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100304562023-03-23 Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction Flury, Andreas Wild, Linda Waltenspül, Manuel Zindel, Christoph Vlachopoulos, Lazaros Imhoff, Florian B. Fucentese, Sandro F. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique. METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage. RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion—which is of importance in case of revision surgery—an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030456/ /pubmed/35287180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Flury, Andreas
Wild, Linda
Waltenspül, Manuel
Zindel, Christoph
Vlachopoulos, Lazaros
Imhoff, Florian B.
Fucentese, Sandro F.
Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title_full Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title_fullStr Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title_short Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction
title_sort tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring acl reconstruction
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fluryandreas tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT wildlinda tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT waltenspulmanuel tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT zindelchristoph tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT vlachopouloslazaros tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT imhoffflorianb tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction
AT fucentesesandrof tibialtunnelenlargementisaffectedbythetunneldiameterscrewratiointibialhybridfixationforhamstringaclreconstruction