Cargando…

Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?

INTRODUCTION: Two-stage revision is a frequently chosen approach to treat chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, management of recurrent infection after a two-stage exchange remains debated and the outcome of a repeat two-stage procedure is unclear. This study investigates the succes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinicke, A. C., Schwarze, J., Gosheger, G., Moellenbeck, B., Ackmann, T., Theil, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04330-z
_version_ 1784910397088727040
author Steinicke, A. C.
Schwarze, J.
Gosheger, G.
Moellenbeck, B.
Ackmann, T.
Theil, C.
author_facet Steinicke, A. C.
Schwarze, J.
Gosheger, G.
Moellenbeck, B.
Ackmann, T.
Theil, C.
author_sort Steinicke, A. C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Two-stage revision is a frequently chosen approach to treat chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, management of recurrent infection after a two-stage exchange remains debated and the outcome of a repeat two-stage procedure is unclear. This study investigates the success rates of repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty and analyzes possible risk factors for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 55 patients (23 hips, 32 knees) who were treated with repeat resection arthroplasty and planned delayed reimplantation for recurrent periprosthetic joint infection between 2010 and 2019 after a prior two-stage revision at the same institution. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a median follow-up time of 34 months (IQR 22–51). The infection-free survival, associated revision surgeries, and potential risk factors for further revision were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and comparative non-parametric testing. RESULTS: 78% (43/55) underwent reimplantation after a repeat implant removal. Of those who completed the second-stage surgery, 37% (16/43) underwent additional revision for infection and 14% (6/55) underwent amputation. The reinfection-free implant survivorship amounted to 77% (95% CI 64–89%) after 1 year and 38% (95% CI 18–57%) after 5 years. Patients with a higher comorbidity score were less likely to undergo second-stage reimplantation (median 5 vs. 3, p = 0.034). Furthermore, obese patients (p = 0.026, Fisher’s exact test) and diabetics (p < 0.001, log-rank test) had a higher risk for further infection. Most commonly cultures yielded polymicrobial growth at the repeat two-stage exchange (27%, 15/55) and at re-reinfection (32%, 9/28). Pathogen persistence was observed in 21% (6/28) of re-reinfected patients. CONCLUSION: The success rates after repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty are low. Patients must be counseled accordingly and different modes of treatment should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100305332023-03-23 Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success? Steinicke, A. C. Schwarze, J. Gosheger, G. Moellenbeck, B. Ackmann, T. Theil, C. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: Two-stage revision is a frequently chosen approach to treat chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, management of recurrent infection after a two-stage exchange remains debated and the outcome of a repeat two-stage procedure is unclear. This study investigates the success rates of repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty and analyzes possible risk factors for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 55 patients (23 hips, 32 knees) who were treated with repeat resection arthroplasty and planned delayed reimplantation for recurrent periprosthetic joint infection between 2010 and 2019 after a prior two-stage revision at the same institution. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a median follow-up time of 34 months (IQR 22–51). The infection-free survival, associated revision surgeries, and potential risk factors for further revision were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and comparative non-parametric testing. RESULTS: 78% (43/55) underwent reimplantation after a repeat implant removal. Of those who completed the second-stage surgery, 37% (16/43) underwent additional revision for infection and 14% (6/55) underwent amputation. The reinfection-free implant survivorship amounted to 77% (95% CI 64–89%) after 1 year and 38% (95% CI 18–57%) after 5 years. Patients with a higher comorbidity score were less likely to undergo second-stage reimplantation (median 5 vs. 3, p = 0.034). Furthermore, obese patients (p = 0.026, Fisher’s exact test) and diabetics (p < 0.001, log-rank test) had a higher risk for further infection. Most commonly cultures yielded polymicrobial growth at the repeat two-stage exchange (27%, 15/55) and at re-reinfection (32%, 9/28). Pathogen persistence was observed in 21% (6/28) of re-reinfected patients. CONCLUSION: The success rates after repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty are low. Patients must be counseled accordingly and different modes of treatment should be considered. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030533/ /pubmed/34982202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04330-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Steinicke, A. C.
Schwarze, J.
Gosheger, G.
Moellenbeck, B.
Ackmann, T.
Theil, C.
Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title_full Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title_fullStr Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title_full_unstemmed Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title_short Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
title_sort repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04330-z
work_keys_str_mv AT steinickeac repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess
AT schwarzej repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess
AT goshegerg repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess
AT moellenbeckb repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess
AT ackmannt repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess
AT theilc repeattwostageexchangearthroplastyforrecurrentperiprosthetichiporkneeinfectionwhatarethechancesforsuccess