Cargando…

ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators

Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begg, Jarrad, Jelen, Urszula, Moutrie, Zoe, Oliver, Chris, Holloway, Lois, Brown, Rhonda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01223-w
_version_ 1784910397846847488
author Begg, Jarrad
Jelen, Urszula
Moutrie, Zoe
Oliver, Chris
Holloway, Lois
Brown, Rhonda
author_facet Begg, Jarrad
Jelen, Urszula
Moutrie, Zoe
Oliver, Chris
Holloway, Lois
Brown, Rhonda
author_sort Begg, Jarrad
collection PubMed
description Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers’ advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR(20,10) is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text] , a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text] , for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100305362023-03-23 ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators Begg, Jarrad Jelen, Urszula Moutrie, Zoe Oliver, Chris Holloway, Lois Brown, Rhonda Phys Eng Sci Med ACPSEM Position Paper Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers’ advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR(20,10) is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text] , a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text] , for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10030536/ /pubmed/36806156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01223-w Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle ACPSEM Position Paper
Begg, Jarrad
Jelen, Urszula
Moutrie, Zoe
Oliver, Chris
Holloway, Lois
Brown, Rhonda
ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title_full ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title_fullStr ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title_full_unstemmed ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title_short ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
title_sort acpsem position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators
topic ACPSEM Position Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36806156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01223-w
work_keys_str_mv AT beggjarrad acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT jelenurszula acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT moutriezoe acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT oliverchris acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT hollowaylois acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT brownrhonda acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators
AT acpsempositionpaperdosimetryformagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerators