Cargando…

A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries

Public health research and human rights bodies have demonstrated the risks involved with criminalising abortion services and noted a need for full decriminalisation. Despite this, abortions are criminalised in some circumstances in almost all countries in the world today. This paper uses data from t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambast, Sanhita, Atay, Hazal, Lavelanet, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010405
_version_ 1784910402151251968
author Ambast, Sanhita
Atay, Hazal
Lavelanet, Antonella
author_facet Ambast, Sanhita
Atay, Hazal
Lavelanet, Antonella
author_sort Ambast, Sanhita
collection PubMed
description Public health research and human rights bodies have demonstrated the risks involved with criminalising abortion services and noted a need for full decriminalisation. Despite this, abortions are criminalised in some circumstances in almost all countries in the world today. This paper uses data from the Global Abortion Policies Database (GAPD) to analyse what criminal penalties exist for those who are seeking, providing and assisting in abortions in 182 countries. This paper uses data on abortion-related penalties available on the GAPD as of October 2022. It includes which actors are penalised, whether specific penalties exist for negligence, non-consensual abortions, whether any secondary additional considerations/judicial discretion exist in sentencing and the legal sources for these penalties. 134 countries penalise abortion-seekers, 181 countries penalise abortion-providers and 159 countries penalise persons assisting in abortions. The maximum penalty is between 0 and 5 years of imprisonment in a majority of countries; however, it can be much higher in other countries. Some countries further prescribe fines, and professional sanctions for providers and those who assist. 34 countries restrict the dissemination of information about abortion. The range of possible penalties across countries and associated aggravating and mitigating factors for imposing these penalties support arguments for the decriminalisation of abortion on the grounds of arbitrariness. Abortions are also predominantly regulated through the criminal law, which may compound the stigma associated with seeking, assisting with and/or providing abortions when it is criminalised. There has been no comprehensive study of penalties for abortion at a global level. This article describes what specific penalties abortion seekers and providers face, what factors may increase or decrease these penalties, and the legal sources for these penalties. The findings provide additional evidence of the arbitrariness and potential for stigma associated with the criminalisation of abortion and strengthen the case for decriminalisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100305582023-03-23 A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries Ambast, Sanhita Atay, Hazal Lavelanet, Antonella BMJ Glob Health Analysis Public health research and human rights bodies have demonstrated the risks involved with criminalising abortion services and noted a need for full decriminalisation. Despite this, abortions are criminalised in some circumstances in almost all countries in the world today. This paper uses data from the Global Abortion Policies Database (GAPD) to analyse what criminal penalties exist for those who are seeking, providing and assisting in abortions in 182 countries. This paper uses data on abortion-related penalties available on the GAPD as of October 2022. It includes which actors are penalised, whether specific penalties exist for negligence, non-consensual abortions, whether any secondary additional considerations/judicial discretion exist in sentencing and the legal sources for these penalties. 134 countries penalise abortion-seekers, 181 countries penalise abortion-providers and 159 countries penalise persons assisting in abortions. The maximum penalty is between 0 and 5 years of imprisonment in a majority of countries; however, it can be much higher in other countries. Some countries further prescribe fines, and professional sanctions for providers and those who assist. 34 countries restrict the dissemination of information about abortion. The range of possible penalties across countries and associated aggravating and mitigating factors for imposing these penalties support arguments for the decriminalisation of abortion on the grounds of arbitrariness. Abortions are also predominantly regulated through the criminal law, which may compound the stigma associated with seeking, assisting with and/or providing abortions when it is criminalised. There has been no comprehensive study of penalties for abortion at a global level. This article describes what specific penalties abortion seekers and providers face, what factors may increase or decrease these penalties, and the legal sources for these penalties. The findings provide additional evidence of the arbitrariness and potential for stigma associated with the criminalisation of abortion and strengthen the case for decriminalisation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10030558/ /pubmed/36941005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010405 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.Disclaimer: The author is a staff member of the World Health Organization. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the World Health Organization.
spellingShingle Analysis
Ambast, Sanhita
Atay, Hazal
Lavelanet, Antonella
A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title_full A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title_fullStr A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title_full_unstemmed A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title_short A global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
title_sort global review of penalties for abortion-related offences in 182 countries
topic Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010405
work_keys_str_mv AT ambastsanhita aglobalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries
AT atayhazal aglobalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries
AT lavelanetantonella aglobalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries
AT ambastsanhita globalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries
AT atayhazal globalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries
AT lavelanetantonella globalreviewofpenaltiesforabortionrelatedoffencesin182countries