Cargando…
OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36931680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729 |
_version_ | 1784910419107774464 |
---|---|
author | van de Meent, Mette Kleuskens, Dianne G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Onland, Wes van Rijn, Bas B. Duvekot, Johannes J. Kornelisse, René F. Al-Nasiry, Salwan Jellema, Reint K. Knol, H. Marieke Manten, Gwendolyn T. R. Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Derks, Jan B. Groenendaal, Floris Bekker, Mireille N. Schuit, Ewoud Lely, A. Titia Kooiman, Judith |
author_facet | van de Meent, Mette Kleuskens, Dianne G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Onland, Wes van Rijn, Bas B. Duvekot, Johannes J. Kornelisse, René F. Al-Nasiry, Salwan Jellema, Reint K. Knol, H. Marieke Manten, Gwendolyn T. R. Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Derks, Jan B. Groenendaal, Floris Bekker, Mireille N. Schuit, Ewoud Lely, A. Titia Kooiman, Judith |
author_sort | van de Meent, Mette |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively when administered within 1 week preceding delivery. Optimal timing of CCS administration is challenging in early-onset FGR, as the exact onset and course of fetal hypoxia are unpredictable. International guidelines do not provide a directive on this topic. In the Netherlands, two timing strategies are commonly practiced: administration of CCS when the umbilical artery shows (A) a pulsatility index above the 95th(h) centile and (B) absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (a more progressed disease state). This study aims to (1) use practice variation to compare CCS timing strategies in early-onset FGR on fetal and neonatal outcomes and (2) develop a dynamic tool to predict the time interval in days until delivery, as a novel timing strategy for antenatal CCS in early-onset FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study will be performed including pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in six tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands in the period between 2012 and 2021 (estimated sample size n=1800). Main exclusion criteria are multiple pregnancies and fetal congenital or genetic abnormalities. Routinely collected data will be extracted from medical charts. Primary outcome for the comparison of the two CCS timing strategies is a composite of perinatal, neonatal and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the COSGROVE core outcome set for FGR. A multivariable, mixed-effects model will be used to compare timing strategies on study outcomes. Primary outcome for the dynamic prediction tool is ‘days until birth’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The need for ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (University Medical Center Utrecht). Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated by presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05606497 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10030622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100306222023-03-23 OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study van de Meent, Mette Kleuskens, Dianne G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Onland, Wes van Rijn, Bas B. Duvekot, Johannes J. Kornelisse, René F. Al-Nasiry, Salwan Jellema, Reint K. Knol, H. Marieke Manten, Gwendolyn T. R. Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Derks, Jan B. Groenendaal, Floris Bekker, Mireille N. Schuit, Ewoud Lely, A. Titia Kooiman, Judith BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively when administered within 1 week preceding delivery. Optimal timing of CCS administration is challenging in early-onset FGR, as the exact onset and course of fetal hypoxia are unpredictable. International guidelines do not provide a directive on this topic. In the Netherlands, two timing strategies are commonly practiced: administration of CCS when the umbilical artery shows (A) a pulsatility index above the 95th(h) centile and (B) absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (a more progressed disease state). This study aims to (1) use practice variation to compare CCS timing strategies in early-onset FGR on fetal and neonatal outcomes and (2) develop a dynamic tool to predict the time interval in days until delivery, as a novel timing strategy for antenatal CCS in early-onset FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study will be performed including pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in six tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands in the period between 2012 and 2021 (estimated sample size n=1800). Main exclusion criteria are multiple pregnancies and fetal congenital or genetic abnormalities. Routinely collected data will be extracted from medical charts. Primary outcome for the comparison of the two CCS timing strategies is a composite of perinatal, neonatal and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the COSGROVE core outcome set for FGR. A multivariable, mixed-effects model will be used to compare timing strategies on study outcomes. Primary outcome for the dynamic prediction tool is ‘days until birth’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The need for ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (University Medical Center Utrecht). Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated by presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05606497 BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10030622/ /pubmed/36931680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology van de Meent, Mette Kleuskens, Dianne G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Onland, Wes van Rijn, Bas B. Duvekot, Johannes J. Kornelisse, René F. Al-Nasiry, Salwan Jellema, Reint K. Knol, H. Marieke Manten, Gwendolyn T. R. Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Derks, Jan B. Groenendaal, Floris Bekker, Mireille N. Schuit, Ewoud Lely, A. Titia Kooiman, Judith OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title | OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title_full | OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title_short | OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth restriction (opticore): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36931680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandemeentmette optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kleuskensdianneg optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT ganzevoortwessel optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT gordijnsannej optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kooielisabethmw optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT onlandwes optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT vanrijnbasb optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT duvekotjohannesj optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kornelisserenef optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT alnasirysalwan optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT jellemareintk optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT knolhmarieke optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mantengwendolyntr optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mulderdetollenaersusannem optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT derksjanb optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT groenendaalfloris optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT bekkermireillen optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT schuitewoud optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT lelyatitia optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kooimanjudith optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy |