Cargando…

OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Meent, Mette, Kleuskens, Dianne G., Ganzevoort, Wessel, Gordijn, Sanne J., Kooi, Elisabeth M. W., Onland, Wes, van Rijn, Bas B., Duvekot, Johannes J., Kornelisse, René F., Al-Nasiry, Salwan, Jellema, Reint K., Knol, H. Marieke, Manten, Gwendolyn T. R., Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M., Derks, Jan B., Groenendaal, Floris, Bekker, Mireille N., Schuit, Ewoud, Lely, A. Titia, Kooiman, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36931680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729
_version_ 1784910419107774464
author van de Meent, Mette
Kleuskens, Dianne G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Onland, Wes
van Rijn, Bas B.
Duvekot, Johannes J.
Kornelisse, René F.
Al-Nasiry, Salwan
Jellema, Reint K.
Knol, H. Marieke
Manten, Gwendolyn T. R.
Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Derks, Jan B.
Groenendaal, Floris
Bekker, Mireille N.
Schuit, Ewoud
Lely, A. Titia
Kooiman, Judith
author_facet van de Meent, Mette
Kleuskens, Dianne G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Onland, Wes
van Rijn, Bas B.
Duvekot, Johannes J.
Kornelisse, René F.
Al-Nasiry, Salwan
Jellema, Reint K.
Knol, H. Marieke
Manten, Gwendolyn T. R.
Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Derks, Jan B.
Groenendaal, Floris
Bekker, Mireille N.
Schuit, Ewoud
Lely, A. Titia
Kooiman, Judith
author_sort van de Meent, Mette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively when administered within 1 week preceding delivery. Optimal timing of CCS administration is challenging in early-onset FGR, as the exact onset and course of fetal hypoxia are unpredictable. International guidelines do not provide a directive on this topic. In the Netherlands, two timing strategies are commonly practiced: administration of CCS when the umbilical artery shows (A) a pulsatility index above the 95th(h) centile and (B) absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (a more progressed disease state). This study aims to (1) use practice variation to compare CCS timing strategies in early-onset FGR on fetal and neonatal outcomes and (2) develop a dynamic tool to predict the time interval in days until delivery, as a novel timing strategy for antenatal CCS in early-onset FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study will be performed including pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in six tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands in the period between 2012 and 2021 (estimated sample size n=1800). Main exclusion criteria are multiple pregnancies and fetal congenital or genetic abnormalities. Routinely collected data will be extracted from medical charts. Primary outcome for the comparison of the two CCS timing strategies is a composite of perinatal, neonatal and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the COSGROVE core outcome set for FGR. A multivariable, mixed-effects model will be used to compare timing strategies on study outcomes. Primary outcome for the dynamic prediction tool is ‘days until birth’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The need for ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (University Medical Center Utrecht). Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated by presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05606497
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10030622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100306222023-03-23 OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study van de Meent, Mette Kleuskens, Dianne G. Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Onland, Wes van Rijn, Bas B. Duvekot, Johannes J. Kornelisse, René F. Al-Nasiry, Salwan Jellema, Reint K. Knol, H. Marieke Manten, Gwendolyn T. R. Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Derks, Jan B. Groenendaal, Floris Bekker, Mireille N. Schuit, Ewoud Lely, A. Titia Kooiman, Judith BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) requires timely, often preterm, delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia causing stillbirth or neurologic impairment. Antenatal corticosteroids (CCS) administration reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality following preterm birth, most effectively when administered within 1 week preceding delivery. Optimal timing of CCS administration is challenging in early-onset FGR, as the exact onset and course of fetal hypoxia are unpredictable. International guidelines do not provide a directive on this topic. In the Netherlands, two timing strategies are commonly practiced: administration of CCS when the umbilical artery shows (A) a pulsatility index above the 95th(h) centile and (B) absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity (a more progressed disease state). This study aims to (1) use practice variation to compare CCS timing strategies in early-onset FGR on fetal and neonatal outcomes and (2) develop a dynamic tool to predict the time interval in days until delivery, as a novel timing strategy for antenatal CCS in early-onset FGR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study will be performed including pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in six tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands in the period between 2012 and 2021 (estimated sample size n=1800). Main exclusion criteria are multiple pregnancies and fetal congenital or genetic abnormalities. Routinely collected data will be extracted from medical charts. Primary outcome for the comparison of the two CCS timing strategies is a composite of perinatal, neonatal and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include the COSGROVE core outcome set for FGR. A multivariable, mixed-effects model will be used to compare timing strategies on study outcomes. Primary outcome for the dynamic prediction tool is ‘days until birth’. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The need for ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (University Medical Center Utrecht). Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated by presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05606497 BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10030622/ /pubmed/36931680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
van de Meent, Mette
Kleuskens, Dianne G.
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Onland, Wes
van Rijn, Bas B.
Duvekot, Johannes J.
Kornelisse, René F.
Al-Nasiry, Salwan
Jellema, Reint K.
Knol, H. Marieke
Manten, Gwendolyn T. R.
Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Derks, Jan B.
Groenendaal, Floris
Bekker, Mireille N.
Schuit, Ewoud
Lely, A. Titia
Kooiman, Judith
OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title_full OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title_short OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
title_sort optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in pregnancies complicated by early-onset fetal growth restriction (opticore): study protocol of a multicentre, retrospective cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36931680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070729
work_keys_str_mv AT vandemeentmette optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kleuskensdianneg optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ganzevoortwessel optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gordijnsannej optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kooielisabethmw optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT onlandwes optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vanrijnbasb optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT duvekotjohannesj optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kornelisserenef optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alnasirysalwan optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jellemareintk optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT knolhmarieke optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mantengwendolyntr optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mulderdetollenaersusannem optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT derksjanb optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT groenendaalfloris optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT bekkermireillen optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT schuitewoud optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lelyatitia optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kooimanjudith optimaltimingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinpregnanciescomplicatedbyearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionopticorestudyprotocolofamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy