Cargando…

Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee

Background and Objective: As in vivo measurements of knee joint contact forces remain challenging, computational musculoskeletal modeling has been popularized as an encouraging solution for non-invasive estimation of joint mechanical loading. Computational musculoskeletal modeling typically relies o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Oevelen, A., Duquesne, K., Peiffer, M., Grammens, J., Burssens, A., Chevalier, A., Steenackers, G., Victor, J., Audenaert, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36970632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1055860
_version_ 1784910505832349696
author Van Oevelen, A.
Duquesne, K.
Peiffer, M.
Grammens, J.
Burssens, A.
Chevalier, A.
Steenackers, G.
Victor, J.
Audenaert, E.
author_facet Van Oevelen, A.
Duquesne, K.
Peiffer, M.
Grammens, J.
Burssens, A.
Chevalier, A.
Steenackers, G.
Victor, J.
Audenaert, E.
author_sort Van Oevelen, A.
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: As in vivo measurements of knee joint contact forces remain challenging, computational musculoskeletal modeling has been popularized as an encouraging solution for non-invasive estimation of joint mechanical loading. Computational musculoskeletal modeling typically relies on laborious manual segmentation as it requires reliable osseous and soft tissue geometry. To improve on feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific geometry predictions, a generic computational approach that can easily be scaled, morphed and fitted to patient-specific knee joint anatomy is presented. Methods: A personalized prediction algorithm was established to derive soft tissue geometry of the knee, originating solely from skeletal anatomy. Based on a MRI dataset (n = 53), manual identification of soft-tissue anatomy and landmarks served as input for our model by use of geometric morphometrics. Topographic distance maps were generated for cartilage thickness predictions. Meniscal modeling relied on wrapping a triangular geometry with varying height and width from the anterior to the posterior root. Elastic mesh wrapping was applied for ligamentous and patellar tendon path modeling. Leave-one-out validation experiments were conducted for accuracy assessment. Results: The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the cartilage layers of the medial tibial plateau, the lateral tibial plateau, the femur and the patella equaled respectively 0.32 mm (range 0.14–0.48), 0.35 mm (range 0.16–0.53), 0.39 mm (range 0.15–0.80) and 0.75 mm (range 0.16–1.11). Similarly, the RMSE equaled respectively 1.16 mm (range 0.99–1.59), 0.91 mm (0.75–1.33), 2.93 mm (range 1.85–4.66) and 2.04 mm (1.88–3.29), calculated over the course of the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, the medial and the lateral meniscus. Conclusion: A methodological workflow is presented for patient-specific, morphological knee joint modeling that avoids laborious segmentation. By allowing to accurately predict personalized geometry this method has the potential for generating large (virtual) sample sizes applicable for biomechanical research and improving personalized, computer-assisted medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10031007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100310072023-03-23 Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee Van Oevelen, A. Duquesne, K. Peiffer, M. Grammens, J. Burssens, A. Chevalier, A. Steenackers, G. Victor, J. Audenaert, E. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background and Objective: As in vivo measurements of knee joint contact forces remain challenging, computational musculoskeletal modeling has been popularized as an encouraging solution for non-invasive estimation of joint mechanical loading. Computational musculoskeletal modeling typically relies on laborious manual segmentation as it requires reliable osseous and soft tissue geometry. To improve on feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific geometry predictions, a generic computational approach that can easily be scaled, morphed and fitted to patient-specific knee joint anatomy is presented. Methods: A personalized prediction algorithm was established to derive soft tissue geometry of the knee, originating solely from skeletal anatomy. Based on a MRI dataset (n = 53), manual identification of soft-tissue anatomy and landmarks served as input for our model by use of geometric morphometrics. Topographic distance maps were generated for cartilage thickness predictions. Meniscal modeling relied on wrapping a triangular geometry with varying height and width from the anterior to the posterior root. Elastic mesh wrapping was applied for ligamentous and patellar tendon path modeling. Leave-one-out validation experiments were conducted for accuracy assessment. Results: The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for the cartilage layers of the medial tibial plateau, the lateral tibial plateau, the femur and the patella equaled respectively 0.32 mm (range 0.14–0.48), 0.35 mm (range 0.16–0.53), 0.39 mm (range 0.15–0.80) and 0.75 mm (range 0.16–1.11). Similarly, the RMSE equaled respectively 1.16 mm (range 0.99–1.59), 0.91 mm (0.75–1.33), 2.93 mm (range 1.85–4.66) and 2.04 mm (1.88–3.29), calculated over the course of the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, the medial and the lateral meniscus. Conclusion: A methodological workflow is presented for patient-specific, morphological knee joint modeling that avoids laborious segmentation. By allowing to accurately predict personalized geometry this method has the potential for generating large (virtual) sample sizes applicable for biomechanical research and improving personalized, computer-assisted medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10031007/ /pubmed/36970632 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1055860 Text en Copyright © 2023 Van Oevelen, Duquesne, Peiffer, Grammens, Burssens, Chevalier, Steenackers, Victor and Audenaert. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Van Oevelen, A.
Duquesne, K.
Peiffer, M.
Grammens, J.
Burssens, A.
Chevalier, A.
Steenackers, G.
Victor, J.
Audenaert, E.
Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title_full Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title_fullStr Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title_full_unstemmed Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title_short Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
title_sort personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36970632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1055860
work_keys_str_mv AT vanoevelena personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT duquesnek personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT peifferm personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT grammensj personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT burssensa personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT chevaliera personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT steenackersg personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT victorj personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee
AT audenaerte personalizedstatisticalmodelingofsofttissuestructuresintheknee