Cargando…

Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease

Demographic factors are fundamental in shaping infectious disease dynamics. Aspects of populations that create structure, like age and sex, can affect patterns of transmission, infection intensity and population outcomes. However, studies rarely link these processes from individual to population-sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kailing, Macy J., Hoyt, Joseph R., White, J. Paul, Kaarakka, Heather M., Redell, Jennifer A., Leon, Ariel E., Rocke, Tonie E., DePue, John E., Scullon, William H., Parise, Katy L., Foster, Jeffrey T., Kilpatrick, A. Marm, Langwig, Kate E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36946110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.0040
_version_ 1784910598575751168
author Kailing, Macy J.
Hoyt, Joseph R.
White, J. Paul
Kaarakka, Heather M.
Redell, Jennifer A.
Leon, Ariel E.
Rocke, Tonie E.
DePue, John E.
Scullon, William H.
Parise, Katy L.
Foster, Jeffrey T.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
Langwig, Kate E.
author_facet Kailing, Macy J.
Hoyt, Joseph R.
White, J. Paul
Kaarakka, Heather M.
Redell, Jennifer A.
Leon, Ariel E.
Rocke, Tonie E.
DePue, John E.
Scullon, William H.
Parise, Katy L.
Foster, Jeffrey T.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
Langwig, Kate E.
author_sort Kailing, Macy J.
collection PubMed
description Demographic factors are fundamental in shaping infectious disease dynamics. Aspects of populations that create structure, like age and sex, can affect patterns of transmission, infection intensity and population outcomes. However, studies rarely link these processes from individual to population-scale effects. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying demographic differences in disease are frequently unclear. Here, we explore sex-biased infections for a multi-host fungal disease of bats, white-nose syndrome, and link disease-associated mortality between sexes, the distortion of sex ratios and the potential mechanisms underlying sex differences in infection. We collected data on host traits, infection intensity and survival of five bat species at 42 sites across seven years. We found females were more infected than males for all five species. Females also had lower apparent survival over winter and accounted for a smaller proportion of populations over time. Notably, female-biased infections were evident by early hibernation and likely driven by sex-based differences in autumn mating behaviour. Male bats were more active during autumn which likely reduced replication of the cool-growing fungus. Higher disease impacts in female bats may have cascading effects on bat populations beyond the hibernation season by limiting recruitment and increasing the risk of Allee effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10031401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100314012023-03-23 Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease Kailing, Macy J. Hoyt, Joseph R. White, J. Paul Kaarakka, Heather M. Redell, Jennifer A. Leon, Ariel E. Rocke, Tonie E. DePue, John E. Scullon, William H. Parise, Katy L. Foster, Jeffrey T. Kilpatrick, A. Marm Langwig, Kate E. Proc Biol Sci Ecology Demographic factors are fundamental in shaping infectious disease dynamics. Aspects of populations that create structure, like age and sex, can affect patterns of transmission, infection intensity and population outcomes. However, studies rarely link these processes from individual to population-scale effects. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying demographic differences in disease are frequently unclear. Here, we explore sex-biased infections for a multi-host fungal disease of bats, white-nose syndrome, and link disease-associated mortality between sexes, the distortion of sex ratios and the potential mechanisms underlying sex differences in infection. We collected data on host traits, infection intensity and survival of five bat species at 42 sites across seven years. We found females were more infected than males for all five species. Females also had lower apparent survival over winter and accounted for a smaller proportion of populations over time. Notably, female-biased infections were evident by early hibernation and likely driven by sex-based differences in autumn mating behaviour. Male bats were more active during autumn which likely reduced replication of the cool-growing fungus. Higher disease impacts in female bats may have cascading effects on bat populations beyond the hibernation season by limiting recruitment and increasing the risk of Allee effects. The Royal Society 2023-03-29 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10031401/ /pubmed/36946110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.0040 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Kailing, Macy J.
Hoyt, Joseph R.
White, J. Paul
Kaarakka, Heather M.
Redell, Jennifer A.
Leon, Ariel E.
Rocke, Tonie E.
DePue, John E.
Scullon, William H.
Parise, Katy L.
Foster, Jeffrey T.
Kilpatrick, A. Marm
Langwig, Kate E.
Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title_full Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title_fullStr Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title_full_unstemmed Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title_short Sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
title_sort sex-biased infections scale to population impacts for an emerging wildlife disease
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36946110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.0040
work_keys_str_mv AT kailingmacyj sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT hoytjosephr sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT whitejpaul sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT kaarakkaheatherm sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT redelljennifera sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT leonariele sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT rocketoniee sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT depuejohne sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT scullonwilliamh sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT parisekatyl sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT fosterjeffreyt sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT kilpatrickamarm sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease
AT langwigkatee sexbiasedinfectionsscaletopopulationimpactsforanemergingwildlifedisease