Cargando…

CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Bonded retainers are widely used to maintain the positions of anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Various types of bonded retainer exist however, there is a lack of evidence to indicate which type is superior. AIM: To compare upper and lower CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainers (Memo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jowett, Adam C, Littlewood, Simon J, Hodge, Trevor M, Dhaliwal, Harmeet K, Wu, Jianhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125221118935
_version_ 1784910648475385856
author Jowett, Adam C
Littlewood, Simon J
Hodge, Trevor M
Dhaliwal, Harmeet K
Wu, Jianhua
author_facet Jowett, Adam C
Littlewood, Simon J
Hodge, Trevor M
Dhaliwal, Harmeet K
Wu, Jianhua
author_sort Jowett, Adam C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bonded retainers are widely used to maintain the positions of anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Various types of bonded retainer exist however, there is a lack of evidence to indicate which type is superior. AIM: To compare upper and lower CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainers (Memotain(®)) with upper and lower chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainers (Ortho-FlexTech™), in terms of stability, retainer failures and patient satisfaction. TRIAL DESIGN: Multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled clinical trial with 1:1 allocation. SETTING: Three trial centres: University Teaching Hospital; District General Hospital; and Specialist Orthodontic Practice. All treatment was provided free as part of a state-funded healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients were randomly allocated to receive either upper and lower Memotain(®) bonded retainers or upper and lower Ortho-FlexTech™ bonded retainers. Ten trained operators placed and reviewed the bonded retainers. Measurements were carried out on study models taken at debond and after six months. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed at six months following debond. RESULTS: The trial was terminated due to the high number of failures (50%) of the upper Memotain® retainers within six months. Memotain(®) retainers were three times more likely to fail (unadjusted hazard ratio = 2.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-7.99) than Ortho-FlexTech™ retainers at six months in the upper arch. Patients were satisfied with both types of retainer. LIMITATIONS: Early termination of the trial means that the a priori sample size was not reached, so outcomes should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: The trial was terminated early due to the high failure rate of upper Memotain(®) bonded retainers. They had a higher risk of failure in the maxillary arch when compared to upper Ortho-FlexTech™ bonded retainers after six months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10031634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100316342023-03-23 CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial Jowett, Adam C Littlewood, Simon J Hodge, Trevor M Dhaliwal, Harmeet K Wu, Jianhua J Orthod Clinical Section BACKGROUND: Bonded retainers are widely used to maintain the positions of anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Various types of bonded retainer exist however, there is a lack of evidence to indicate which type is superior. AIM: To compare upper and lower CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainers (Memotain(®)) with upper and lower chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainers (Ortho-FlexTech™), in terms of stability, retainer failures and patient satisfaction. TRIAL DESIGN: Multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled clinical trial with 1:1 allocation. SETTING: Three trial centres: University Teaching Hospital; District General Hospital; and Specialist Orthodontic Practice. All treatment was provided free as part of a state-funded healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients were randomly allocated to receive either upper and lower Memotain(®) bonded retainers or upper and lower Ortho-FlexTech™ bonded retainers. Ten trained operators placed and reviewed the bonded retainers. Measurements were carried out on study models taken at debond and after six months. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed at six months following debond. RESULTS: The trial was terminated due to the high number of failures (50%) of the upper Memotain® retainers within six months. Memotain(®) retainers were three times more likely to fail (unadjusted hazard ratio = 2.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-7.99) than Ortho-FlexTech™ retainers at six months in the upper arch. Patients were satisfied with both types of retainer. LIMITATIONS: Early termination of the trial means that the a priori sample size was not reached, so outcomes should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: The trial was terminated early due to the high failure rate of upper Memotain(®) bonded retainers. They had a higher risk of failure in the maxillary arch when compared to upper Ortho-FlexTech™ bonded retainers after six months. SAGE Publications 2022-09-04 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10031634/ /pubmed/36062600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125221118935 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Section
Jowett, Adam C
Littlewood, Simon J
Hodge, Trevor M
Dhaliwal, Harmeet K
Wu, Jianhua
CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort cad/cam nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Clinical Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36062600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125221118935
work_keys_str_mv AT jowettadamc cadcamnitinolbondedretainerversusachairsiderectangularchainbondedretaineramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT littlewoodsimonj cadcamnitinolbondedretainerversusachairsiderectangularchainbondedretaineramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hodgetrevorm cadcamnitinolbondedretainerversusachairsiderectangularchainbondedretaineramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dhaliwalharmeetk cadcamnitinolbondedretainerversusachairsiderectangularchainbondedretaineramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wujianhua cadcamnitinolbondedretainerversusachairsiderectangularchainbondedretaineramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial