Cargando…
Erfahrungen mit Gefährdungssituationen in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie bei Patienten mit extremistischer Einstellung
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dangerous situations in connection with the treatment of persons with suspected extremist attitudes have become increasingly relevant. A survey of physicians and psychotherapists is intended to provide information about concrete dangerous situations among these patients. M...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-023-01469-5 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dangerous situations in connection with the treatment of persons with suspected extremist attitudes have become increasingly relevant. A survey of physicians and psychotherapists is intended to provide information about concrete dangerous situations among these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By means of an anonymous online survey, which comprised 16 main questions and up to 95 additional questions, a total of 364 health professionals were asked about the general situation and about patients, as well as relatives with suspected extremist attitudes. RESULTS: In all, 17.5% of the participants were physicians, 72.1% psychotherapists. 47.7% work exclusively in a hospital, 34.2% in a private practice. A total of 57.7% of the participants have already treated patients with suspected extremist attitudes (46.7% treated relatives); 27.6% were confronted with situations of self-endangerment (30.1% in the case of relatives), 49.5% with situations of danger to others (18.3% in the case of relatives), in which they often did not feel safe. Altogether, 20.3% of the professionals informed security authorities, and not quite half found this contact to be comparatively unhelpful/not at all helpful (45.5% among relatives). The majority of the participants had no contact to other agencies, such as specialized counselling centres for deradicalization. Physicians experienced the situations of endangerment more often than non-medical psychotherapists. A comparison between professionals from hospitals and private practices shows no significant differences. DISCUSSION: The study was able to show that extremism and the associated dangerous situations are an important topic in the treatment of patients and that physicians and non-medical psychotherapists should be well prepared. Networking with extremism prevention agencies and good cooperation with security authorities would be important and desirable for the future. |
---|