Cargando…
Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task?
Social media platforms, as a particular species of digital platforms offering multiple online services and electronic commerce opportunities, have been under increasing scrutiny by competition enforcement agencies in recent years for engaging in allegedly anticompetitive practices. These technology...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01302-1 |
_version_ | 1784910666767794176 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Burton Toh, Ding Jun |
author_facet | Ong, Burton Toh, Ding Jun |
author_sort | Ong, Burton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social media platforms, as a particular species of digital platforms offering multiple online services and electronic commerce opportunities, have been under increasing scrutiny by competition enforcement agencies in recent years for engaging in allegedly anticompetitive practices. These technology giants have also come under fire for their role in facilitating various anti-social practices that have sowed societal discord and conflict in many different jurisdictions. In this paper, we examine the reasons why undertakings operating in this particular sector of the digital economy have managed to acquire such an exceptional species of “digital dominance” that makes them particularly challenging targets for competition authorities to rein in using conventional competition law frameworks. We then argue that, in light of the conceptual and practical difficulties of relying on competition law enforcement as the primary mechanism to address the problems associated with the behaviour of social media platforms, policymakers should focus their attention instead on tailor-making sector-specific ex ante regulatory frameworks that are better equipped to address the different public and private interests that need to be balanced against each other when evaluating the conduct of these particular digital ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10031722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100317222023-03-22 Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? Ong, Burton Toh, Ding Jun IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law Article Social media platforms, as a particular species of digital platforms offering multiple online services and electronic commerce opportunities, have been under increasing scrutiny by competition enforcement agencies in recent years for engaging in allegedly anticompetitive practices. These technology giants have also come under fire for their role in facilitating various anti-social practices that have sowed societal discord and conflict in many different jurisdictions. In this paper, we examine the reasons why undertakings operating in this particular sector of the digital economy have managed to acquire such an exceptional species of “digital dominance” that makes them particularly challenging targets for competition authorities to rein in using conventional competition law frameworks. We then argue that, in light of the conceptual and practical difficulties of relying on competition law enforcement as the primary mechanism to address the problems associated with the behaviour of social media platforms, policymakers should focus their attention instead on tailor-making sector-specific ex ante regulatory frameworks that are better equipped to address the different public and private interests that need to be balanced against each other when evaluating the conduct of these particular digital ecosystems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10031722/ /pubmed/37073397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01302-1 Text en © Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Ong, Burton Toh, Ding Jun Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title | Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title_full | Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title_fullStr | Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title_short | Digital Dominance and Social Media Platforms: Are Competition Authorities Up to the Task? |
title_sort | digital dominance and social media platforms: are competition authorities up to the task? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01302-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ongburton digitaldominanceandsocialmediaplatformsarecompetitionauthoritiesuptothetask AT tohdingjun digitaldominanceandsocialmediaplatformsarecompetitionauthoritiesuptothetask |