Cargando…
Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework
In microbiome fields of study, meta-analyses have proven to be a valuable tool for identifying the technical drivers of variation among studies and results of investigations in several diseases, such as those of the gut and sinuses. Meta-analyses also represent a powerful and efficient approach to l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01499-w |
_version_ | 1784910691921035264 |
---|---|
author | Broderick, David Marsh, Robyn Waite, David Pillarisetti, Naveen Chang, Anne B. Taylor, Michael W. |
author_facet | Broderick, David Marsh, Robyn Waite, David Pillarisetti, Naveen Chang, Anne B. Taylor, Michael W. |
author_sort | Broderick, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | In microbiome fields of study, meta-analyses have proven to be a valuable tool for identifying the technical drivers of variation among studies and results of investigations in several diseases, such as those of the gut and sinuses. Meta-analyses also represent a powerful and efficient approach to leverage existing scientific data to both reaffirm existing findings and generate new hypotheses within the field. However, there are currently limited data in other fields, such as the paediatric respiratory tract, where extension of original data becomes even more critical due to samples often being difficult to obtain and process for a range of both technical and ethical reasons. Performing such analyses in an evolving field comes with challenges related to data accessibility and heterogeneity. This is particularly the case in paediatric respiratory microbiomics — a field in which best microbiome-related practices are not yet firmly established, clinical heterogeneity abounds and ethical challenges can complicate sharing of patient data. Having recently conducted a large-scale, individual participant data meta-analysis of the paediatric respiratory microbiota (n = 2624 children from 20 studies), we discuss here some of the unique barriers facing these studies and open and invite a dialogue towards future opportunities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01499-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10031919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100319192023-03-23 Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework Broderick, David Marsh, Robyn Waite, David Pillarisetti, Naveen Chang, Anne B. Taylor, Michael W. Microbiome Correspondence In microbiome fields of study, meta-analyses have proven to be a valuable tool for identifying the technical drivers of variation among studies and results of investigations in several diseases, such as those of the gut and sinuses. Meta-analyses also represent a powerful and efficient approach to leverage existing scientific data to both reaffirm existing findings and generate new hypotheses within the field. However, there are currently limited data in other fields, such as the paediatric respiratory tract, where extension of original data becomes even more critical due to samples often being difficult to obtain and process for a range of both technical and ethical reasons. Performing such analyses in an evolving field comes with challenges related to data accessibility and heterogeneity. This is particularly the case in paediatric respiratory microbiomics — a field in which best microbiome-related practices are not yet firmly established, clinical heterogeneity abounds and ethical challenges can complicate sharing of patient data. Having recently conducted a large-scale, individual participant data meta-analysis of the paediatric respiratory microbiota (n = 2624 children from 20 studies), we discuss here some of the unique barriers facing these studies and open and invite a dialogue towards future opportunities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-023-01499-w. BioMed Central 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10031919/ /pubmed/36945040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01499-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Broderick, David Marsh, Robyn Waite, David Pillarisetti, Naveen Chang, Anne B. Taylor, Michael W. Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title | Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title_full | Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title_fullStr | Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title_short | Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
title_sort | realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01499-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broderickdavid realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework AT marshrobyn realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework AT waitedavid realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework AT pillarisettinaveen realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework AT changanneb realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework AT taylormichaelw realisingrespiratorymicrobiomicmetaanalysestimeforastandardisedframework |