Cargando…

A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels

INTRODUCTION: Smokers can respond defensively to health risk communication such as on-pack warning labels, potentially reducing their effectiveness. Theory suggests that risk perception together with self-efficacy reduces defensive responses and predicts target behaviors. Currently, tobacco warning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinken, Lillian, Ferguson, Stuart G, Buscot, Marie-Jeanne, Schüz, Benjamin, Maynard, Olivia, Schüz, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac229
_version_ 1784910744349835264
author Brinken, Lillian
Ferguson, Stuart G
Buscot, Marie-Jeanne
Schüz, Benjamin
Maynard, Olivia
Schüz, Natalie
author_facet Brinken, Lillian
Ferguson, Stuart G
Buscot, Marie-Jeanne
Schüz, Benjamin
Maynard, Olivia
Schüz, Natalie
author_sort Brinken, Lillian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Smokers can respond defensively to health risk communication such as on-pack warning labels, potentially reducing their effectiveness. Theory suggests that risk perception together with self-efficacy reduces defensive responses and predicts target behaviors. Currently, tobacco warning labels globally predominantly target risk and do not explicitly consider efficacy. AIMS: This study explores the effectiveness of combining Australian tobacco warning labels with efficacy content to increase quitting intentions. METHODS: RCT in 83 smokers over 3 weeks. After a seven-day baseline phase (smoking from usual tobacco packaging), participants were randomized to one of two adhesive labels groups for the remaining 14 days: Standard health warning labels (HWLs) featuring enhanced efficacy messages (experimental group) or unmodified standard HWLs (control group). Participants attached these labels to their tobacco packaging and recorded their cognitions and smoking behavior once daily using Smartphones. Multilevel structural equation modeling was used to test theorized effects of the labels on self-efficacy, risk perception, and intentions to quit. RESULTS: There was no effect of exposure to efficacy messages on either self-efficacy, risk perceptions, or intentions to quit. However, self-efficacy and risk perceptions were positively associated with quitting intentions at the within-person level. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive relationships between self-efficacy, risk perception, and intention to quit were supported, however, supplementing standard warning labels with efficacy messages had no effect on these cognitions. Whether this is due to conditioned avoidance of HWLS, characteristics of the messages, or limitations imposed by format are unclear. IMPLICATIONS: Self-efficacy and risk perception predict intentions to quit smoking. Adding efficacy content to tobacco health warnings may have the potential to bolster these cognitions but more research is required to determine the contexts in which this would be effective and who would be likely to benefit. The time course by which exposure to efficacy content might influence cessation self-efficacy and downstream quitting intentions also needs to be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10032187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100321872023-03-23 A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels Brinken, Lillian Ferguson, Stuart G Buscot, Marie-Jeanne Schüz, Benjamin Maynard, Olivia Schüz, Natalie Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: Smokers can respond defensively to health risk communication such as on-pack warning labels, potentially reducing their effectiveness. Theory suggests that risk perception together with self-efficacy reduces defensive responses and predicts target behaviors. Currently, tobacco warning labels globally predominantly target risk and do not explicitly consider efficacy. AIMS: This study explores the effectiveness of combining Australian tobacco warning labels with efficacy content to increase quitting intentions. METHODS: RCT in 83 smokers over 3 weeks. After a seven-day baseline phase (smoking from usual tobacco packaging), participants were randomized to one of two adhesive labels groups for the remaining 14 days: Standard health warning labels (HWLs) featuring enhanced efficacy messages (experimental group) or unmodified standard HWLs (control group). Participants attached these labels to their tobacco packaging and recorded their cognitions and smoking behavior once daily using Smartphones. Multilevel structural equation modeling was used to test theorized effects of the labels on self-efficacy, risk perception, and intentions to quit. RESULTS: There was no effect of exposure to efficacy messages on either self-efficacy, risk perceptions, or intentions to quit. However, self-efficacy and risk perceptions were positively associated with quitting intentions at the within-person level. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive relationships between self-efficacy, risk perception, and intention to quit were supported, however, supplementing standard warning labels with efficacy messages had no effect on these cognitions. Whether this is due to conditioned avoidance of HWLS, characteristics of the messages, or limitations imposed by format are unclear. IMPLICATIONS: Self-efficacy and risk perception predict intentions to quit smoking. Adding efficacy content to tobacco health warnings may have the potential to bolster these cognitions but more research is required to determine the contexts in which this would be effective and who would be likely to benefit. The time course by which exposure to efficacy content might influence cessation self-efficacy and downstream quitting intentions also needs to be investigated. Oxford University Press 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10032187/ /pubmed/36194161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac229 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Brinken, Lillian
Ferguson, Stuart G
Buscot, Marie-Jeanne
Schüz, Benjamin
Maynard, Olivia
Schüz, Natalie
A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title_full A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title_fullStr A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title_short A Pilot Randomised Trial Investigating the Effects of Including Efficacy Messaging on Tobacco Warning Labels
title_sort pilot randomised trial investigating the effects of including efficacy messaging on tobacco warning labels
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac229
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkenlillian apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT fergusonstuartg apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT buscotmariejeanne apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT schuzbenjamin apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT maynardolivia apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT schuznatalie apilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT brinkenlillian pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT fergusonstuartg pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT buscotmariejeanne pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT schuzbenjamin pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT maynardolivia pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels
AT schuznatalie pilotrandomisedtrialinvestigatingtheeffectsofincludingefficacymessagingontobaccowarninglabels