Cargando…

Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China

OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors for neonatal congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and the influencing factors of false-positive results in CH screening. METHODS: In this study, 255 neonatal patients with CH who completed the screening and further diagnosis and 366 neonates with positive CH screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Xueqin, Wang, Li, Chen, Xiaolan, Wang, Anru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36969736
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S400804
_version_ 1784910749021241344
author Yan, Xueqin
Wang, Li
Chen, Xiaolan
Wang, Anru
author_facet Yan, Xueqin
Wang, Li
Chen, Xiaolan
Wang, Anru
author_sort Yan, Xueqin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors for neonatal congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and the influencing factors of false-positive results in CH screening. METHODS: In this study, 255 neonatal patients with CH who completed the screening and further diagnosis and 366 neonates with positive CH screening results and normal thyroid function were selected as the case group. 246 healthy neonates with normal thyroid function were selected as the control group. Gestational age, birth-weight, maternal age, small for gestational age (SGA), perinatal factors (gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, etc.) were used as influencing factors, using χ(2) tests were performed for comparison. The statistically significant variables were analyzed with Logistic multiple regression models, and the difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.05). RESULTS: There were statistical differences in the SGA, maternal gestational diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and the proportion using assisted reproduction technology among the case group, false-positive screening group, and control group (χ(2) was 11.943, 6.857, 6.999, 9.732, respectively, P < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the gestational thyroid disease (OR = 8.452, 95% CI:1.051–67.982), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.654, 95% CI:1.051–6.706), and assisted reproduction (OR = 0.194, 95% CI:0.041–0.911) were the influencing factors for neonatal CH, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SGA (OR = 2.556, 95% CI:1.027–6.361), gestational thyroid disease (OR = 7.801, 95% CI:1.03–59.057), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.731, 95% CI:1.18–6.322), and assisted reproduction (OR = 0.28, 95% CI:0.102–0.765) were the influencing factors of the false-positive screening results of neonatal CH. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neonatal CH and positive screening results are influenced by assisted reproduction, gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, and SGA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10032214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100322142023-03-23 Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China Yan, Xueqin Wang, Li Chen, Xiaolan Wang, Anru J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors for neonatal congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and the influencing factors of false-positive results in CH screening. METHODS: In this study, 255 neonatal patients with CH who completed the screening and further diagnosis and 366 neonates with positive CH screening results and normal thyroid function were selected as the case group. 246 healthy neonates with normal thyroid function were selected as the control group. Gestational age, birth-weight, maternal age, small for gestational age (SGA), perinatal factors (gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, etc.) were used as influencing factors, using χ(2) tests were performed for comparison. The statistically significant variables were analyzed with Logistic multiple regression models, and the difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.05). RESULTS: There were statistical differences in the SGA, maternal gestational diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and the proportion using assisted reproduction technology among the case group, false-positive screening group, and control group (χ(2) was 11.943, 6.857, 6.999, 9.732, respectively, P < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the gestational thyroid disease (OR = 8.452, 95% CI:1.051–67.982), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.654, 95% CI:1.051–6.706), and assisted reproduction (OR = 0.194, 95% CI:0.041–0.911) were the influencing factors for neonatal CH, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SGA (OR = 2.556, 95% CI:1.027–6.361), gestational thyroid disease (OR = 7.801, 95% CI:1.03–59.057), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.731, 95% CI:1.18–6.322), and assisted reproduction (OR = 0.28, 95% CI:0.102–0.765) were the influencing factors of the false-positive screening results of neonatal CH. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neonatal CH and positive screening results are influenced by assisted reproduction, gestational thyroid dysfunction, gestational diabetes mellitus, and SGA. Dove 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10032214/ /pubmed/36969736 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S400804 Text en © 2023 Yan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yan, Xueqin
Wang, Li
Chen, Xiaolan
Wang, Anru
Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title_full Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title_fullStr Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title_short Analysis of Risk Factors and Screening Results of Neonatal Congenital Hypothyroidism in a Tertiary Care Center of Southern China
title_sort analysis of risk factors and screening results of neonatal congenital hypothyroidism in a tertiary care center of southern china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36969736
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S400804
work_keys_str_mv AT yanxueqin analysisofriskfactorsandscreeningresultsofneonatalcongenitalhypothyroidisminatertiarycarecenterofsouthernchina
AT wangli analysisofriskfactorsandscreeningresultsofneonatalcongenitalhypothyroidisminatertiarycarecenterofsouthernchina
AT chenxiaolan analysisofriskfactorsandscreeningresultsofneonatalcongenitalhypothyroidisminatertiarycarecenterofsouthernchina
AT wanganru analysisofriskfactorsandscreeningresultsofneonatalcongenitalhypothyroidisminatertiarycarecenterofsouthernchina