Cargando…

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the values obtained in measuring central corneal thickness using the OrbscanIIz(®) and the contact ultrasonic pachymeter available in our public ophthalmology service. METHODS: Measurements were taken from 88 eyes of 44 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero-Trevejo, José L., Sánchez-Pérez, Andrés, Muñoz-García, Erika, Fernández-Romero, Lourdes, Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968780
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.Sjopt_82_21
_version_ 1784910767850520576
author Romero-Trevejo, José L.
Sánchez-Pérez, Andrés
Muñoz-García, Erika
Fernández-Romero, Lourdes
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel F.
author_facet Romero-Trevejo, José L.
Sánchez-Pérez, Andrés
Muñoz-García, Erika
Fernández-Romero, Lourdes
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel F.
author_sort Romero-Trevejo, José L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the values obtained in measuring central corneal thickness using the OrbscanIIz(®) and the contact ultrasonic pachymeter available in our public ophthalmology service. METHODS: Measurements were taken from 88 eyes of 44 patients using the two instruments. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using version 22 of the IBM SPSS(®) program. RESULTS: The mean of central corneal thickness measurements obtained from OrbscanIIz(®) was significantly higher than that obtained from ultrasound pachymetry. However, the mean of differences between both instruments was only 7.22 μ, which could be considered a clinically insignificant result when considering the good concordance obtained between both systems. CONCLUSION: OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry can be interchangeable in the usual public clinical practice when measuring central corneal thickness. This is the first research found in the literature that uses a concordance study to compare the data resulting from central corneal thickness measurements obtained by an OrbscanIIz(®) and an OcuScan(®) pachymeter in our environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10032292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100322922023-03-23 Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice Romero-Trevejo, José L. Sánchez-Pérez, Andrés Muñoz-García, Erika Fernández-Romero, Lourdes Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel F. Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the values obtained in measuring central corneal thickness using the OrbscanIIz(®) and the contact ultrasonic pachymeter available in our public ophthalmology service. METHODS: Measurements were taken from 88 eyes of 44 patients using the two instruments. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using version 22 of the IBM SPSS(®) program. RESULTS: The mean of central corneal thickness measurements obtained from OrbscanIIz(®) was significantly higher than that obtained from ultrasound pachymetry. However, the mean of differences between both instruments was only 7.22 μ, which could be considered a clinically insignificant result when considering the good concordance obtained between both systems. CONCLUSION: OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry can be interchangeable in the usual public clinical practice when measuring central corneal thickness. This is the first research found in the literature that uses a concordance study to compare the data resulting from central corneal thickness measurements obtained by an OrbscanIIz(®) and an OcuScan(®) pachymeter in our environment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10032292/ /pubmed/36968780 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.Sjopt_82_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Romero-Trevejo, José L.
Sánchez-Pérez, Andrés
Muñoz-García, Erika
Fernández-Romero, Lourdes
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel F.
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title_full Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title_fullStr Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title_short Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by OrbscanIIz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: A concordance study in the usual clinical practice
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by orbscaniiz(®) and ultrasound pachymetry: a concordance study in the usual clinical practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968780
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.Sjopt_82_21
work_keys_str_mv AT romerotrevejojosel comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsobtainedbyorbscaniizandultrasoundpachymetryaconcordancestudyintheusualclinicalpractice
AT sanchezperezandres comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsobtainedbyorbscaniizandultrasoundpachymetryaconcordancestudyintheusualclinicalpractice
AT munozgarciaerika comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsobtainedbyorbscaniizandultrasoundpachymetryaconcordancestudyintheusualclinicalpractice
AT fernandezromerolourdes comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsobtainedbyorbscaniizandultrasoundpachymetryaconcordancestudyintheusualclinicalpractice
AT jimeneznavarromanuelf comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementsobtainedbyorbscaniizandultrasoundpachymetryaconcordancestudyintheusualclinicalpractice