Cargando…

Adverse Events and Measurement of Dissociation After the First Dose of Esketamine in Patients With TRD

BACKGROUND: “Dissociation” comprises distinct phenomena, some of which are associated with esketamine treatment and some may overlap with positive symptoms of psychosis. Relationships between dissociation and psychotic symptoms assessed by ­clinician report vs conventional rating scales were investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, David, Turkoz, Ibrahim, Wajs, Ewa, Singh, Jaskaran B, Borentain, Stephane, Drevets, Wayne C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyac081
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: “Dissociation” comprises distinct phenomena, some of which are associated with esketamine treatment and some may overlap with positive symptoms of psychosis. Relationships between dissociation and psychotic symptoms assessed by ­clinician report vs conventional rating scales were investigated in a post hoc analysis of data from the initial treatment session in an ­open-label, ­long-term safety, phase 3 study of esketamine plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant in patients with treatment-resistant depression. METHODS: Adverse events of dissociation or psychosis were examined via investigator report and the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Plus, respectively, 40 minutes post first esketamine dose. The range of CADSS total scores associated with investigator-reported severity of dissociation was determined by equipercentile linking. Logistic regression models and receiver operating curve analysis explored the CADSS cutoff point for determining presence/absence of dissociation. Frequency of response to specific CADSS items was examined to investigate qualitative differences in the pattern of symptoms reported across investigator-reported levels of adverse event severity. RESULTS: Dissociation was reported as an adverse event in 14.3% (109/764) of patients. Severity of most CADSS items increased with the severity of investigator-reported dissociation. No CADSS cutoff point discriminated well between the presence and absence of dissociation events. Hallucinations were reported as adverse events in 5 patients; none reported delusions. CONCLUSIONS: CADSS scores and severity of dissociation adverse events move generally in the same direction; however, there is substantial variability in this relationship. No signature profile of dissociative experiences was revealed, and psychotic symptoms were uncommon. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT02497287