Cargando…

Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The rare inherited autosomal recessive disease Friedreich ataxia (FA) causes progressive neurodegenerative changes and disability in patients. A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to understand and summarize the published efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Paridhi, Badgujar, Lohit, Spoorendonk, Jelle, Buesch, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26330040221139872
_version_ 1784910799346597888
author Jain, Paridhi
Badgujar, Lohit
Spoorendonk, Jelle
Buesch, Katharina
author_facet Jain, Paridhi
Badgujar, Lohit
Spoorendonk, Jelle
Buesch, Katharina
author_sort Jain, Paridhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The rare inherited autosomal recessive disease Friedreich ataxia (FA) causes progressive neurodegenerative changes and disability in patients. A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to understand and summarize the published efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions in this disease. METHODS: Database searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane by two independent reviewers. In addition, trial registries and conference proceedings were hand-searched. RESULTS: Thirty-two publications were deemed eligible according to PICOS criteria. Twenty-four publications detail randomized controlled trials. The most frequently identified therapeutic intervention was idebenone (n = 11), followed by recombinant erythropoietin (n = 6), omaveloxolone (n = 3), and amantadine hydrochloride (n = 2). Other therapeutic interventions were investigated in one publication: A0001, CoQ10, creatine, deferiprone, interferon-γ-1b, the L-carnitine levorotatory form of 5-hydroxytryptophan, luvadaxistat, resveratrol, RT001, and vatiquinone (EPI-743). These studies included patients from 8 to 73 years old, and disease duration varied from 4.7 to 19 years. Disease severity as per the mean GAA1 and GAA2 allele repeat length ranged from 350 to 930 and 620 to 987 nucleotides, respectively. Most frequently reported efficacy outcomes were the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS, n = 10), the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (modified FARS and FARS-neuro, n = 12), the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA, n = 7), and the Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL, n = 8). Each of these assesses the severity of disability in FA patients. In many studies, patients with FA deteriorated according to these severity scales regardless of treatment, or inconclusive results were found. Generally, these therapeutic interventions were well-tolerated and safe. Serious adverse events were atrial fibrillation (n = 1), craniocerebral injury (n = 1), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Identified literature showed a considerable unmet need for therapeutic interventions that halt or slow the deteriorating nature of FA. Novel efficacious drugs should be investigated that aim to improve symptoms or slow disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10032438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100324382023-05-11 Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review Jain, Paridhi Badgujar, Lohit Spoorendonk, Jelle Buesch, Katharina Ther Adv Rare Dis Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The rare inherited autosomal recessive disease Friedreich ataxia (FA) causes progressive neurodegenerative changes and disability in patients. A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to understand and summarize the published efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions in this disease. METHODS: Database searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane by two independent reviewers. In addition, trial registries and conference proceedings were hand-searched. RESULTS: Thirty-two publications were deemed eligible according to PICOS criteria. Twenty-four publications detail randomized controlled trials. The most frequently identified therapeutic intervention was idebenone (n = 11), followed by recombinant erythropoietin (n = 6), omaveloxolone (n = 3), and amantadine hydrochloride (n = 2). Other therapeutic interventions were investigated in one publication: A0001, CoQ10, creatine, deferiprone, interferon-γ-1b, the L-carnitine levorotatory form of 5-hydroxytryptophan, luvadaxistat, resveratrol, RT001, and vatiquinone (EPI-743). These studies included patients from 8 to 73 years old, and disease duration varied from 4.7 to 19 years. Disease severity as per the mean GAA1 and GAA2 allele repeat length ranged from 350 to 930 and 620 to 987 nucleotides, respectively. Most frequently reported efficacy outcomes were the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS, n = 10), the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (modified FARS and FARS-neuro, n = 12), the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA, n = 7), and the Activities of Daily Living scale (ADL, n = 8). Each of these assesses the severity of disability in FA patients. In many studies, patients with FA deteriorated according to these severity scales regardless of treatment, or inconclusive results were found. Generally, these therapeutic interventions were well-tolerated and safe. Serious adverse events were atrial fibrillation (n = 1), craniocerebral injury (n = 1), and ventricular tachycardia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Identified literature showed a considerable unmet need for therapeutic interventions that halt or slow the deteriorating nature of FA. Novel efficacious drugs should be investigated that aim to improve symptoms or slow disease progression. SAGE Publications 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10032438/ /pubmed/37180421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26330040221139872 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Jain, Paridhi
Badgujar, Lohit
Spoorendonk, Jelle
Buesch, Katharina
Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title_full Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title_short Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
title_sort clinical evidence of interventions assessed in friedreich ataxia: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26330040221139872
work_keys_str_mv AT jainparidhi clinicalevidenceofinterventionsassessedinfriedreichataxiaasystematicreview
AT badgujarlohit clinicalevidenceofinterventionsassessedinfriedreichataxiaasystematicreview
AT spoorendonkjelle clinicalevidenceofinterventionsassessedinfriedreichataxiaasystematicreview
AT bueschkatharina clinicalevidenceofinterventionsassessedinfriedreichataxiaasystematicreview