Cargando…

Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies

Paige Prostate is a clinical-grade artificial intelligence tool designed to assist the pathologist in detecting, grading, and quantifying prostate cancer. In this work, a cohort of 105 prostate core needle biopsies (CNBs) was evaluated through digital pathology. Then, we compared the diagnostic perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eloy, Catarina, Marques, Ana, Pinto, João, Pinheiro, Jorge, Campelos, Sofia, Curado, Mónica, Vale, João, Polónia, António
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03518-5
_version_ 1784911021695041536
author Eloy, Catarina
Marques, Ana
Pinto, João
Pinheiro, Jorge
Campelos, Sofia
Curado, Mónica
Vale, João
Polónia, António
author_facet Eloy, Catarina
Marques, Ana
Pinto, João
Pinheiro, Jorge
Campelos, Sofia
Curado, Mónica
Vale, João
Polónia, António
author_sort Eloy, Catarina
collection PubMed
description Paige Prostate is a clinical-grade artificial intelligence tool designed to assist the pathologist in detecting, grading, and quantifying prostate cancer. In this work, a cohort of 105 prostate core needle biopsies (CNBs) was evaluated through digital pathology. Then, we compared the diagnostic performance of four pathologists diagnosing prostatic CNB unaided and, in a second phase, assisted by Paige Prostate. In phase 1, pathologists had a diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer of 95.00%, maintaining their performance in phase 2 (93.81%), with an intraobserver concordance rate between phases of 98.81%. In phase 2, pathologists reported atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) less often (about 30% less). Additionally, they requested significantly fewer immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies (about 20% less) and second opinions (about 40% less). The median time required for reading and reporting each slide was about 20% lower in phase 2, in both negative and cancer cases. Lastly, the average total agreement with the software performance was observed in about 70% of the cases, being significantly higher in negative cases (about 90%) than in cancer cases (about 30%). Most of the diagnostic discordances occurred in distinguishing negative cases with ASAP from small foci of well-differentiated (less than 1.5 mm) acinar adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, the synergic usage of Paige Prostate contributes to a significant decrease in IHC studies, second opinion requests, and time for reporting while maintaining highly accurate diagnostic standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-023-03518-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10033575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100335752023-03-24 Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies Eloy, Catarina Marques, Ana Pinto, João Pinheiro, Jorge Campelos, Sofia Curado, Mónica Vale, João Polónia, António Virchows Arch Original Article Paige Prostate is a clinical-grade artificial intelligence tool designed to assist the pathologist in detecting, grading, and quantifying prostate cancer. In this work, a cohort of 105 prostate core needle biopsies (CNBs) was evaluated through digital pathology. Then, we compared the diagnostic performance of four pathologists diagnosing prostatic CNB unaided and, in a second phase, assisted by Paige Prostate. In phase 1, pathologists had a diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer of 95.00%, maintaining their performance in phase 2 (93.81%), with an intraobserver concordance rate between phases of 98.81%. In phase 2, pathologists reported atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) less often (about 30% less). Additionally, they requested significantly fewer immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies (about 20% less) and second opinions (about 40% less). The median time required for reading and reporting each slide was about 20% lower in phase 2, in both negative and cancer cases. Lastly, the average total agreement with the software performance was observed in about 70% of the cases, being significantly higher in negative cases (about 90%) than in cancer cases (about 30%). Most of the diagnostic discordances occurred in distinguishing negative cases with ASAP from small foci of well-differentiated (less than 1.5 mm) acinar adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, the synergic usage of Paige Prostate contributes to a significant decrease in IHC studies, second opinion requests, and time for reporting while maintaining highly accurate diagnostic standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-023-03518-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10033575/ /pubmed/36809483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03518-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Eloy, Catarina
Marques, Ana
Pinto, João
Pinheiro, Jorge
Campelos, Sofia
Curado, Mónica
Vale, João
Polónia, António
Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title_full Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title_short Artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
title_sort artificial intelligence–assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03518-5
work_keys_str_mv AT eloycatarina artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT marquesana artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT pintojoao artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT pinheirojorge artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT campelossofia artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT curadomonica artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT valejoao artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies
AT poloniaantonio artificialintelligenceassistedcancerdiagnosisimprovestheefficiencyofpathologistsinprostaticbiopsies