Cargando…
Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation
Many intensive care unit patients who undergo endotracheal extubation experience extubation failure and require reintubation. Because of the high mortality rate associated with reintubation, postextubation respiratory management is crucial, especially for high-risk populations. We conducted the pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31444-8 |
_version_ | 1784911045771395072 |
---|---|
author | Tseng, Chi-Wei Chao, Ke-Yun Wu, Hsiu-Li Lin, Chen-Chun Hsu, Han-Shui |
author_facet | Tseng, Chi-Wei Chao, Ke-Yun Wu, Hsiu-Li Lin, Chen-Chun Hsu, Han-Shui |
author_sort | Tseng, Chi-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many intensive care unit patients who undergo endotracheal extubation experience extubation failure and require reintubation. Because of the high mortality rate associated with reintubation, postextubation respiratory management is crucial, especially for high-risk populations. We conducted the present study to compare the effectiveness of oxygen therapy administered using high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing reintubation among patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). This single-center, prospective, unblinded randomized controlled trial was at the respiratory care center (RCC). Participants were randomized to an HFNC group or an NIPPV group (20 patients in each) and received noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) administered using their assigned method. The primary outcome was reintubation within7 days after extubation. None of the patients in the NIPPV group required reintubation, whereas 5 (25%) of the patients in the HFNC group required reintubation (P = 0.047). The 90-day mortality rates of the NIPPV and HFNC groups (four patients [20%] vs. two patients [10%], respectively) did not differ significantly. No significant differences in length of RCC stay, length of hospital stay, time to liberation from NRS, and ventilator-free days at 28-day were identified. The time to event outcome analysis also revealed that the risk of reintubation in the HFNC group was higher than that in the NIPPV group (P = 0.018). Although HFNC is becoming increasingly common as a form of postextubation NRS, HFNC may not be as effective as NIPPV in preventing reintubation among patients who have been receiving PMV for at least 2 weeks. Additional studies evaluating HFNC as an alternative to NIPPV for patients receiving PMV are warranted. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04564859; IRB number: 20160901R. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04564859). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10033681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100336812023-03-24 Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation Tseng, Chi-Wei Chao, Ke-Yun Wu, Hsiu-Li Lin, Chen-Chun Hsu, Han-Shui Sci Rep Article Many intensive care unit patients who undergo endotracheal extubation experience extubation failure and require reintubation. Because of the high mortality rate associated with reintubation, postextubation respiratory management is crucial, especially for high-risk populations. We conducted the present study to compare the effectiveness of oxygen therapy administered using high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing reintubation among patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). This single-center, prospective, unblinded randomized controlled trial was at the respiratory care center (RCC). Participants were randomized to an HFNC group or an NIPPV group (20 patients in each) and received noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) administered using their assigned method. The primary outcome was reintubation within7 days after extubation. None of the patients in the NIPPV group required reintubation, whereas 5 (25%) of the patients in the HFNC group required reintubation (P = 0.047). The 90-day mortality rates of the NIPPV and HFNC groups (four patients [20%] vs. two patients [10%], respectively) did not differ significantly. No significant differences in length of RCC stay, length of hospital stay, time to liberation from NRS, and ventilator-free days at 28-day were identified. The time to event outcome analysis also revealed that the risk of reintubation in the HFNC group was higher than that in the NIPPV group (P = 0.018). Although HFNC is becoming increasingly common as a form of postextubation NRS, HFNC may not be as effective as NIPPV in preventing reintubation among patients who have been receiving PMV for at least 2 weeks. Additional studies evaluating HFNC as an alternative to NIPPV for patients receiving PMV are warranted. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04564859; IRB number: 20160901R. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04564859). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10033681/ /pubmed/36949116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31444-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Tseng, Chi-Wei Chao, Ke-Yun Wu, Hsiu-Li Lin, Chen-Chun Hsu, Han-Shui Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title | Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title_full | Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title_short | Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
title_sort | effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31444-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsengchiwei effectivenessofhighflownasalcannulaecomparedwithnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpreventingreintubationinpatientsreceivingprolongedmechanicalventilation AT chaokeyun effectivenessofhighflownasalcannulaecomparedwithnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpreventingreintubationinpatientsreceivingprolongedmechanicalventilation AT wuhsiuli effectivenessofhighflownasalcannulaecomparedwithnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpreventingreintubationinpatientsreceivingprolongedmechanicalventilation AT linchenchun effectivenessofhighflownasalcannulaecomparedwithnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpreventingreintubationinpatientsreceivingprolongedmechanicalventilation AT hsuhanshui effectivenessofhighflownasalcannulaecomparedwithnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpreventingreintubationinpatientsreceivingprolongedmechanicalventilation |