Cargando…

Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens

To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia, Pérez-Rueda, Antonio, Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón, Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José, Castro-Luna, Gracia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5
_version_ 1784911052724502528
author Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón
Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José
Castro-Luna, Gracia
author_facet Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón
Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José
Castro-Luna, Gracia
author_sort Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia
collection PubMed
description To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer. Barret formulas and the Kane were obtained from the online calculator. Patients are classified according to axial length (AL) into three groups: AL ≤ 22 mm, 22 < AL < 25 mm, and AL ≥ 25 mm. In addition, implanted intraocular lenses are classified as Monofocal, extended focus, and Multifocal. There are no significant differences between the formulas. In short, the Kane formula was more accurate than the other biometric formulas. Kane and SRK/T were the most accurate in monofocal lenses, with the lowest residual refractive error. The Holladay I formula obtained the lowest mean absolute error with the highest number of eyes with minimum residual ± 0.5Dp in the multifocal lenses in the 22 < AL < 25 mm eyes. In the long AL eyes, SRK/T and Kane's obtained the lowest mean absolute error and the best percentage of eyes with ± 0.5Dp of residual refractive error. There are no significant differences between the formulas. However Kane's formula has shown high accuracy, especially in short and long eyes with monofocal lenses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10033709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100337092023-03-24 Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José Castro-Luna, Gracia Sci Rep Article To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer. Barret formulas and the Kane were obtained from the online calculator. Patients are classified according to axial length (AL) into three groups: AL ≤ 22 mm, 22 < AL < 25 mm, and AL ≥ 25 mm. In addition, implanted intraocular lenses are classified as Monofocal, extended focus, and Multifocal. There are no significant differences between the formulas. In short, the Kane formula was more accurate than the other biometric formulas. Kane and SRK/T were the most accurate in monofocal lenses, with the lowest residual refractive error. The Holladay I formula obtained the lowest mean absolute error with the highest number of eyes with minimum residual ± 0.5Dp in the multifocal lenses in the 22 < AL < 25 mm eyes. In the long AL eyes, SRK/T and Kane's obtained the lowest mean absolute error and the best percentage of eyes with ± 0.5Dp of residual refractive error. There are no significant differences between the formulas. However Kane's formula has shown high accuracy, especially in short and long eyes with monofocal lenses. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10033709/ /pubmed/36949327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia
Pérez-Rueda, Antonio
Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón
Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José
Castro-Luna, Gracia
Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title_full Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title_fullStr Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title_short Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
title_sort evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezlinannoelia evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens
AT perezruedaantonio evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens
AT parroncarrenotesifon evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens
AT nievassorianobrunojose evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens
AT castrolunagracia evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens