Cargando…
Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens
To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5 |
_version_ | 1784911052724502528 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José Castro-Luna, Gracia |
author_facet | Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José Castro-Luna, Gracia |
author_sort | Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer. Barret formulas and the Kane were obtained from the online calculator. Patients are classified according to axial length (AL) into three groups: AL ≤ 22 mm, 22 < AL < 25 mm, and AL ≥ 25 mm. In addition, implanted intraocular lenses are classified as Monofocal, extended focus, and Multifocal. There are no significant differences between the formulas. In short, the Kane formula was more accurate than the other biometric formulas. Kane and SRK/T were the most accurate in monofocal lenses, with the lowest residual refractive error. The Holladay I formula obtained the lowest mean absolute error with the highest number of eyes with minimum residual ± 0.5Dp in the multifocal lenses in the 22 < AL < 25 mm eyes. In the long AL eyes, SRK/T and Kane's obtained the lowest mean absolute error and the best percentage of eyes with ± 0.5Dp of residual refractive error. There are no significant differences between the formulas. However Kane's formula has shown high accuracy, especially in short and long eyes with monofocal lenses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10033709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100337092023-03-24 Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José Castro-Luna, Gracia Sci Rep Article To compare the accuracy of the modern biometric formulas in cataract surgery according to axial length and lens type. It is a Cross-sectional design from 365 patients who underwent cataract surgery. The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Holladay I formulas were extracted from the IOLMaster 500 biometer. Barret formulas and the Kane were obtained from the online calculator. Patients are classified according to axial length (AL) into three groups: AL ≤ 22 mm, 22 < AL < 25 mm, and AL ≥ 25 mm. In addition, implanted intraocular lenses are classified as Monofocal, extended focus, and Multifocal. There are no significant differences between the formulas. In short, the Kane formula was more accurate than the other biometric formulas. Kane and SRK/T were the most accurate in monofocal lenses, with the lowest residual refractive error. The Holladay I formula obtained the lowest mean absolute error with the highest number of eyes with minimum residual ± 0.5Dp in the multifocal lenses in the 22 < AL < 25 mm eyes. In the long AL eyes, SRK/T and Kane's obtained the lowest mean absolute error and the best percentage of eyes with ± 0.5Dp of residual refractive error. There are no significant differences between the formulas. However Kane's formula has shown high accuracy, especially in short and long eyes with monofocal lenses. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10033709/ /pubmed/36949327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Liñan, Noelia Pérez-Rueda, Antonio Parrón-Carreño, Tesifón Nievas-Soriano, Bruno-José Castro-Luna, Gracia Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title | Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title_full | Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title_short | Evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
title_sort | evaluation of biometric formulas in the calculation of intraocular lens according to axial length and type of the lens |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31970-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezlinannoelia evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens AT perezruedaantonio evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens AT parroncarrenotesifon evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens AT nievassorianobrunojose evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens AT castrolunagracia evaluationofbiometricformulasinthecalculationofintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallengthandtypeofthelens |