Cargando…

Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is a common and challenging symptom for telephone triage in urgent primary care. Existing chest-pain-specific risk scores originally developed for diagnostic purposes may outperform current telephone triage protocols. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective, observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manten, A., De Clercq, L., Rietveld, R. P., Lucassen, W. A. M., Moll van Charante, E. P., Harskamp, R. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0
_version_ 1784911067436023808
author Manten, A.
De Clercq, L.
Rietveld, R. P.
Lucassen, W. A. M.
Moll van Charante, E. P.
Harskamp, R. E.
author_facet Manten, A.
De Clercq, L.
Rietveld, R. P.
Lucassen, W. A. M.
Moll van Charante, E. P.
Harskamp, R. E.
author_sort Manten, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is a common and challenging symptom for telephone triage in urgent primary care. Existing chest-pain-specific risk scores originally developed for diagnostic purposes may outperform current telephone triage protocols. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective, observational cohort of consecutive patients evaluated for chest pain at a large-scale out-of-hours primary care facility in the Netherlands. We evaluated the performance of the Marburg Heart Score (MHS) and INTERCHEST score as stand-alone triage tools and compared them with the current decision support tool, the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS). The outcomes of interest were: C‑statistics, calibration and diagnostic accuracy for optimised thresholds with major events as the reference standard. Major events are a composite of all-cause mortality and both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular urgent underlying conditions occurring within 6 weeks of initial contact. RESULTS: We included 1433 patients, 57.6% women, with a median age of 55.0 years. Major events occurred in 16.4% (n = 235), of which acute coronary syndrome accounted for 6.8% (n = 98). For predicting major events, C‑statistics for the MHS and INTERCHEST score were 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.70–0.77) and 0.76 (0.73–0.80), respectively. In comparison, the NTS had a C-statistic of 0.66 (0.62–0.69). All had appropriate calibration. Both scores (at threshold ≥ 2) reduced the number of referrals (with lower false-positive rates) and maintained equal safety compared with the NTS. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic risk stratification scores for chest pain may also improve telephone triage for major events in out-of-hours primary care, by reducing the number of unnecessary referrals without compromising triage safety. Further validation is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10033786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100337862023-03-24 Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care Manten, A. De Clercq, L. Rietveld, R. P. Lucassen, W. A. M. Moll van Charante, E. P. Harskamp, R. E. Neth Heart J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is a common and challenging symptom for telephone triage in urgent primary care. Existing chest-pain-specific risk scores originally developed for diagnostic purposes may outperform current telephone triage protocols. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective, observational cohort of consecutive patients evaluated for chest pain at a large-scale out-of-hours primary care facility in the Netherlands. We evaluated the performance of the Marburg Heart Score (MHS) and INTERCHEST score as stand-alone triage tools and compared them with the current decision support tool, the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS). The outcomes of interest were: C‑statistics, calibration and diagnostic accuracy for optimised thresholds with major events as the reference standard. Major events are a composite of all-cause mortality and both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular urgent underlying conditions occurring within 6 weeks of initial contact. RESULTS: We included 1433 patients, 57.6% women, with a median age of 55.0 years. Major events occurred in 16.4% (n = 235), of which acute coronary syndrome accounted for 6.8% (n = 98). For predicting major events, C‑statistics for the MHS and INTERCHEST score were 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.70–0.77) and 0.76 (0.73–0.80), respectively. In comparison, the NTS had a C-statistic of 0.66 (0.62–0.69). All had appropriate calibration. Both scores (at threshold ≥ 2) reduced the number of referrals (with lower false-positive rates) and maintained equal safety compared with the NTS. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic risk stratification scores for chest pain may also improve telephone triage for major events in out-of-hours primary care, by reducing the number of unnecessary referrals without compromising triage safety. Further validation is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2022-12-29 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10033786/ /pubmed/36580267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Manten, A.
De Clercq, L.
Rietveld, R. P.
Lucassen, W. A. M.
Moll van Charante, E. P.
Harskamp, R. E.
Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title_full Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title_short Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
title_sort evaluation of the marburg heart score and interchest score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mantena evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare
AT declercql evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare
AT rietveldrp evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare
AT lucassenwam evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare
AT mollvancharanteep evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare
AT harskampre evaluationofthemarburgheartscoreandinterchestscorecomparedtocurrenttelephonetriageforchestpaininoutofhoursprimarycare