Cargando…

Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis

BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peper, J., Becker, L. M., Bruning, T. A., Budde, R. P. J., van Dockum, W. G., Frederix, G. W. J., Habets, J., Henriques, J. P. S., Houthuizen, P., Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A., Planken, R. N., Voskuil, M., Bots, M. L., Leiner, T., Swaans, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3
_version_ 1784911068241330176
author Peper, J.
Becker, L. M.
Bruning, T. A.
Budde, R. P. J.
van Dockum, W. G.
Frederix, G. W. J.
Habets, J.
Henriques, J. P. S.
Houthuizen, P.
Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A.
Planken, R. N.
Voskuil, M.
Bots, M. L.
Leiner, T.
Swaans, M. J.
author_facet Peper, J.
Becker, L. M.
Bruning, T. A.
Budde, R. P. J.
van Dockum, W. G.
Frederix, G. W. J.
Habets, J.
Henriques, J. P. S.
Houthuizen, P.
Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A.
Planken, R. N.
Voskuil, M.
Bots, M. L.
Leiner, T.
Swaans, M. J.
author_sort Peper, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. Non-invasive and less-invasive imaging techniques such as computed-tomography-derived FFR (FFR-CT) and angiography-derived FFR (QFR) combine both anatomical and functional information in complex algorithms to calculate FFR. TRIAL DESIGN: The iCORONARY trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a blinded endpoint evaluation. It investigates the costs, effects and outcomes of different diagnostic strategies to evaluate the presence of CAD and the need for revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris who undergo coronary computed tomography angiography. Those with a Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score between 0–2 and 5 will be included in a prospective registry, whereas patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4A will be enrolled in the RCT. The RCT consists of three randomised groups: (1) FFR-CT-guided strategy, (2) QFR-guided strategy or (3) standard of care including ICA and invasive pressure measurements for all intermediate stenoses. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation) at 1 year. Clinicaltrials.gov-identifier: NCT04939207. CONCLUSION: The iCORONARY trial will assess whether a strategy of FFR-CT or QFR is non-inferior to invasive angiography to guide the need for revascularisation in patients with stable CAD. Non-inferiority to the standard of care implies that these techniques are attractive, less-invasive alternatives to current diagnostic pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10033793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100337932023-03-24 Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis Peper, J. Becker, L. M. Bruning, T. A. Budde, R. P. J. van Dockum, W. G. Frederix, G. W. J. Habets, J. Henriques, J. P. S. Houthuizen, P. Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A. Planken, R. N. Voskuil, M. Bots, M. L. Leiner, T. Swaans, M. J. Neth Heart J Original Article – Study Design Article BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. Non-invasive and less-invasive imaging techniques such as computed-tomography-derived FFR (FFR-CT) and angiography-derived FFR (QFR) combine both anatomical and functional information in complex algorithms to calculate FFR. TRIAL DESIGN: The iCORONARY trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a blinded endpoint evaluation. It investigates the costs, effects and outcomes of different diagnostic strategies to evaluate the presence of CAD and the need for revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris who undergo coronary computed tomography angiography. Those with a Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score between 0–2 and 5 will be included in a prospective registry, whereas patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4A will be enrolled in the RCT. The RCT consists of three randomised groups: (1) FFR-CT-guided strategy, (2) QFR-guided strategy or (3) standard of care including ICA and invasive pressure measurements for all intermediate stenoses. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation) at 1 year. Clinicaltrials.gov-identifier: NCT04939207. CONCLUSION: The iCORONARY trial will assess whether a strategy of FFR-CT or QFR is non-inferior to invasive angiography to guide the need for revascularisation in patients with stable CAD. Non-inferiority to the standard of care implies that these techniques are attractive, less-invasive alternatives to current diagnostic pathways. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2023-01-31 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10033793/ /pubmed/36720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article – Study Design Article
Peper, J.
Becker, L. M.
Bruning, T. A.
Budde, R. P. J.
van Dockum, W. G.
Frederix, G. W. J.
Habets, J.
Henriques, J. P. S.
Houthuizen, P.
Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A.
Planken, R. N.
Voskuil, M.
Bots, M. L.
Leiner, T.
Swaans, M. J.
Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title_full Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title_short Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
title_sort rationale and design of the icoronary trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
topic Original Article – Study Design Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peperj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT beckerlm rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT bruningta rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT budderpj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT vandockumwg rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT frederixgwj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT habetsj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT henriquesjps rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT houthuizenp rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT mohamedhoeseinfaa rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT plankenrn rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT voskuilm rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT botsml rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT leinert rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis
AT swaansmj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis