Cargando…
Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis
BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3 |
_version_ | 1784911068241330176 |
---|---|
author | Peper, J. Becker, L. M. Bruning, T. A. Budde, R. P. J. van Dockum, W. G. Frederix, G. W. J. Habets, J. Henriques, J. P. S. Houthuizen, P. Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A. Planken, R. N. Voskuil, M. Bots, M. L. Leiner, T. Swaans, M. J. |
author_facet | Peper, J. Becker, L. M. Bruning, T. A. Budde, R. P. J. van Dockum, W. G. Frederix, G. W. J. Habets, J. Henriques, J. P. S. Houthuizen, P. Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A. Planken, R. N. Voskuil, M. Bots, M. L. Leiner, T. Swaans, M. J. |
author_sort | Peper, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. Non-invasive and less-invasive imaging techniques such as computed-tomography-derived FFR (FFR-CT) and angiography-derived FFR (QFR) combine both anatomical and functional information in complex algorithms to calculate FFR. TRIAL DESIGN: The iCORONARY trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a blinded endpoint evaluation. It investigates the costs, effects and outcomes of different diagnostic strategies to evaluate the presence of CAD and the need for revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris who undergo coronary computed tomography angiography. Those with a Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score between 0–2 and 5 will be included in a prospective registry, whereas patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4A will be enrolled in the RCT. The RCT consists of three randomised groups: (1) FFR-CT-guided strategy, (2) QFR-guided strategy or (3) standard of care including ICA and invasive pressure measurements for all intermediate stenoses. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation) at 1 year. Clinicaltrials.gov-identifier: NCT04939207. CONCLUSION: The iCORONARY trial will assess whether a strategy of FFR-CT or QFR is non-inferior to invasive angiography to guide the need for revascularisation in patients with stable CAD. Non-inferiority to the standard of care implies that these techniques are attractive, less-invasive alternatives to current diagnostic pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10033793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100337932023-03-24 Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis Peper, J. Becker, L. M. Bruning, T. A. Budde, R. P. J. van Dockum, W. G. Frederix, G. W. J. Habets, J. Henriques, J. P. S. Houthuizen, P. Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A. Planken, R. N. Voskuil, M. Bots, M. L. Leiner, T. Swaans, M. J. Neth Heart J Original Article – Study Design Article BACKGROUND: In patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. Non-invasive and less-invasive imaging techniques such as computed-tomography-derived FFR (FFR-CT) and angiography-derived FFR (QFR) combine both anatomical and functional information in complex algorithms to calculate FFR. TRIAL DESIGN: The iCORONARY trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a blinded endpoint evaluation. It investigates the costs, effects and outcomes of different diagnostic strategies to evaluate the presence of CAD and the need for revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris who undergo coronary computed tomography angiography. Those with a Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score between 0–2 and 5 will be included in a prospective registry, whereas patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4A will be enrolled in the RCT. The RCT consists of three randomised groups: (1) FFR-CT-guided strategy, (2) QFR-guided strategy or (3) standard of care including ICA and invasive pressure measurements for all intermediate stenoses. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation) at 1 year. Clinicaltrials.gov-identifier: NCT04939207. CONCLUSION: The iCORONARY trial will assess whether a strategy of FFR-CT or QFR is non-inferior to invasive angiography to guide the need for revascularisation in patients with stable CAD. Non-inferiority to the standard of care implies that these techniques are attractive, less-invasive alternatives to current diagnostic pathways. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2023-01-31 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10033793/ /pubmed/36720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Study Design Article Peper, J. Becker, L. M. Bruning, T. A. Budde, R. P. J. van Dockum, W. G. Frederix, G. W. J. Habets, J. Henriques, J. P. S. Houthuizen, P. Mohamed Hoesein, F. A. A. Planken, R. N. Voskuil, M. Bots, M. L. Leiner, T. Swaans, M. J. Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title | Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title_full | Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title_short | Rationale and design of the iCORONARY trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
title_sort | rationale and design of the icoronary trial: improving the cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease diagnosis |
topic | Original Article – Study Design Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01758-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peperj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT beckerlm rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT bruningta rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT budderpj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT vandockumwg rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT frederixgwj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT habetsj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT henriquesjps rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT houthuizenp rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT mohamedhoeseinfaa rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT plankenrn rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT voskuilm rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT botsml rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT leinert rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis AT swaansmj rationaleanddesignoftheicoronarytrialimprovingthecosteffectivenessofcoronaryarterydiseasediagnosis |