Cargando…

Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton

Precision irrigation technologies using sensor feedback can provide dynamic decision support to help farmers implement DI strategies. However, few studies have reported on the use of these systems for DI management. This two-year study was conducted in Bushland, Texas to investigate the performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Shaughnessy, Susan A., Colaizzi, Paul D., Bednarz, Craig W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1149424
_version_ 1784911120615604224
author O’Shaughnessy, Susan A.
Colaizzi, Paul D.
Bednarz, Craig W.
author_facet O’Shaughnessy, Susan A.
Colaizzi, Paul D.
Bednarz, Craig W.
author_sort O’Shaughnessy, Susan A.
collection PubMed
description Precision irrigation technologies using sensor feedback can provide dynamic decision support to help farmers implement DI strategies. However, few studies have reported on the use of these systems for DI management. This two-year study was conducted in Bushland, Texas to investigate the performance of the geographic information (GIS) based irrigation scheduling supervisory control and data acquisition (ISSCADA) system as a tool to manage deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton (Gossypim hirsutum L). Two different irrigation scheduling methods automated by the ISSCADA system — (1) a plant feedback (designated C) - based on integrated crop water stress index ((i)CWSI) thresholds, and (2) a hybrid (designated H) method, created to combine soil water depletion and the (i)CWSI thresholds, were compared with a benchmark manual irrigation scheduling (M) that used weekly neutron probe readings. Each method applied irrigation at levels designed to be equivalent to 25%, 50% and 75% replenishment of soil water depletion to near field capacity (designated I(25), I(50) and I(75)) using the pre-established thresholds stored in the ISSCADA system or the designated percent replenishment of soil water depletion to field capacity in the M method. Fully irrigated and extremely deficit irrigated plots were also established. Relative to the fully irrigated plots, deficit irrigated plots at the I(75) level for all irrigation scheduling methods-maintained seed cotton yield, while saving water. In 2021, the irrigation savings was a minimum of 20%, while in 2022, the minimum savings was 16%. Comparing the performance of deficit irrigation scheduling between the ISSCADA system and the manual method showed that crop response for all three methods were statistically similar at each irrigation level. Because the M method requires labor intensive and expensive use of the highly regulated neutron probe, the automated decision support provided by the ISSCADA system could simplify deficit irrigation management of cotton in a semi-arid region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10034034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100340342023-03-24 Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton O’Shaughnessy, Susan A. Colaizzi, Paul D. Bednarz, Craig W. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Precision irrigation technologies using sensor feedback can provide dynamic decision support to help farmers implement DI strategies. However, few studies have reported on the use of these systems for DI management. This two-year study was conducted in Bushland, Texas to investigate the performance of the geographic information (GIS) based irrigation scheduling supervisory control and data acquisition (ISSCADA) system as a tool to manage deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton (Gossypim hirsutum L). Two different irrigation scheduling methods automated by the ISSCADA system — (1) a plant feedback (designated C) - based on integrated crop water stress index ((i)CWSI) thresholds, and (2) a hybrid (designated H) method, created to combine soil water depletion and the (i)CWSI thresholds, were compared with a benchmark manual irrigation scheduling (M) that used weekly neutron probe readings. Each method applied irrigation at levels designed to be equivalent to 25%, 50% and 75% replenishment of soil water depletion to near field capacity (designated I(25), I(50) and I(75)) using the pre-established thresholds stored in the ISSCADA system or the designated percent replenishment of soil water depletion to field capacity in the M method. Fully irrigated and extremely deficit irrigated plots were also established. Relative to the fully irrigated plots, deficit irrigated plots at the I(75) level for all irrigation scheduling methods-maintained seed cotton yield, while saving water. In 2021, the irrigation savings was a minimum of 20%, while in 2022, the minimum savings was 16%. Comparing the performance of deficit irrigation scheduling between the ISSCADA system and the manual method showed that crop response for all three methods were statistically similar at each irrigation level. Because the M method requires labor intensive and expensive use of the highly regulated neutron probe, the automated decision support provided by the ISSCADA system could simplify deficit irrigation management of cotton in a semi-arid region. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10034034/ /pubmed/36968387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1149424 Text en Copyright © 2023 O’Shaughnessy, Colaizzi and Bednarz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
O’Shaughnessy, Susan A.
Colaizzi, Paul D.
Bednarz, Craig W.
Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title_full Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title_fullStr Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title_full_unstemmed Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title_short Sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
title_sort sensor feedback system enables automated deficit irrigation scheduling for cotton
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1149424
work_keys_str_mv AT oshaughnessysusana sensorfeedbacksystemenablesautomateddeficitirrigationschedulingforcotton
AT colaizzipauld sensorfeedbacksystemenablesautomateddeficitirrigationschedulingforcotton
AT bednarzcraigw sensorfeedbacksystemenablesautomateddeficitirrigationschedulingforcotton