Cargando…
Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example
Strategies such as ensemble learning and averaging techniques try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on ensemble averaging techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100304 |
_version_ | 1784911239234715648 |
---|---|
author | Göb, St. Sawant, S. Erick, F.X. Schmidkonz, C. Ramming, A. Lang, E.W. Wittenberg, T. Götz, Th.I. |
author_facet | Göb, St. Sawant, S. Erick, F.X. Schmidkonz, C. Ramming, A. Lang, E.W. Wittenberg, T. Götz, Th.I. |
author_sort | Göb, St. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Strategies such as ensemble learning and averaging techniques try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on ensemble averaging techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an application example, various ensembles have been initialized and formed during network training, whereby the following methods have been applied: (a) random seeds, (b) L(1)-norm pruning, (c) variable numbers of training examples, and (d) a combination of the latter 2 items. Furthermore, different averaging methods are in common use and were evaluated in this study. As averaging methods, the mean, the median, and the location parameter of an alpha-stable distribution, fit to the histograms of class membership probabilities (CMPs), as well as a majority vote of the members of an ensemble were considered. The performance of these methods is demonstrated and evaluated on a micrograph cell segmentation use case, employing a common state-of-the art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture exploiting the principle of the common VGG-architecture. The study demonstrates that for this data set, the choice of the ensemble averaging method only has a marginal influence on the evaluation metrics (accuracy and Dice coefficient) used to measure the segmentation performance. Nevertheless, for practical applications, a simple and fast estimate of the mean of the distribution is highly competitive with respect to the most sophisticated representation of the CMP distributions by an alpha-stable distribution, and hence seems the most proper ensemble averaging method to be used for this application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10034515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100345152023-03-24 Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example Göb, St. Sawant, S. Erick, F.X. Schmidkonz, C. Ramming, A. Lang, E.W. Wittenberg, T. Götz, Th.I. J Pathol Inform Original Research Article Strategies such as ensemble learning and averaging techniques try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on ensemble averaging techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an application example, various ensembles have been initialized and formed during network training, whereby the following methods have been applied: (a) random seeds, (b) L(1)-norm pruning, (c) variable numbers of training examples, and (d) a combination of the latter 2 items. Furthermore, different averaging methods are in common use and were evaluated in this study. As averaging methods, the mean, the median, and the location parameter of an alpha-stable distribution, fit to the histograms of class membership probabilities (CMPs), as well as a majority vote of the members of an ensemble were considered. The performance of these methods is demonstrated and evaluated on a micrograph cell segmentation use case, employing a common state-of-the art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture exploiting the principle of the common VGG-architecture. The study demonstrates that for this data set, the choice of the ensemble averaging method only has a marginal influence on the evaluation metrics (accuracy and Dice coefficient) used to measure the segmentation performance. Nevertheless, for practical applications, a simple and fast estimate of the mean of the distribution is highly competitive with respect to the most sophisticated representation of the CMP distributions by an alpha-stable distribution, and hence seems the most proper ensemble averaging method to be used for this application. Elsevier 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10034515/ /pubmed/36967835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100304 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Göb, St. Sawant, S. Erick, F.X. Schmidkonz, C. Ramming, A. Lang, E.W. Wittenberg, T. Götz, Th.I. Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title | Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title_full | Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title_fullStr | Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title_short | Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
title_sort | comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gobst comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT sawants comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT erickfx comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT schmidkonzc comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT ramminga comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT langew comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT wittenbergt comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample AT gotzthi comparingensemblemethodscombinedwithdifferentaggregatingmodelsusingmicrographcellsegmentationasaninitialapplicationexample |