Cargando…

Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leone, Riccardo, Meredig, Hagen, Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha, Sahm, Felix, Hamelmann, Stefan, Kurz, Felix, Kessler, Tobias, Bonekamp, David, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Bo Hansen, Mikkel, Wick, Wolfgang, Bendszus, Martin, Vollmuth, Philipp, Brugnara, Gianluca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016
_version_ 1784911311905226752
author Leone, Riccardo
Meredig, Hagen
Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha
Sahm, Felix
Hamelmann, Stefan
Kurz, Felix
Kessler, Tobias
Bonekamp, David
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Bo Hansen, Mikkel
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Vollmuth, Philipp
Brugnara, Gianluca
author_facet Leone, Riccardo
Meredig, Hagen
Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha
Sahm, Felix
Hamelmann, Stefan
Kurz, Felix
Kessler, Tobias
Bonekamp, David
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Bo Hansen, Mikkel
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Vollmuth, Philipp
Brugnara, Gianluca
author_sort Leone, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an accurate differential diagnosis. Here, we tested these parameters and combined them with radiomic features (RFs), clinical data, and MGMT promoter methylation status using machine- and deep-learning (DL) models to distinguish PsPD from Progressive disease. METHODS: In a single-center analysis, 105 patients with GB who developed a suspected imaging PsPD in the first 7 months after standard CRT were identified retrospectively. Imaging data included standard MRI anatomical sequences, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) maps. Median values (ADC, nrCBV) and RFs (all sequences) were calculated from DL-based tumor segmentations. Generalized linear models with LASSO feature-selection and DL models were built integrating clinical data, MGMT methylation status, median ADC and nrCBV values and RFs. RESULTS: A model based on clinical data and MGMT methylation status yielded an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.83) for detecting PsPD, and the addition of median ADC and nrCBV values resulted in a nonsignificant increase in performance (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.85, P = .416). Combining clinical/MGMT information with RFs derived from ADC, nrCBV, and from all available sequences both resulted in significantly (both P < .005) lower model performances, with AUC = 0.52 (0.38–0.66) and AUC = 0.54 (0.40–0.68), respectively. DL imaging models resulted in AUCs ≤ 0.56. CONCLUSION: Currently available imaging biomarkers could not reliably differentiate PsPD from true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma; larger collaborative efforts are needed to build more reliable models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10034916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100349162023-03-24 Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma Leone, Riccardo Meredig, Hagen Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha Sahm, Felix Hamelmann, Stefan Kurz, Felix Kessler, Tobias Bonekamp, David Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Bo Hansen, Mikkel Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an accurate differential diagnosis. Here, we tested these parameters and combined them with radiomic features (RFs), clinical data, and MGMT promoter methylation status using machine- and deep-learning (DL) models to distinguish PsPD from Progressive disease. METHODS: In a single-center analysis, 105 patients with GB who developed a suspected imaging PsPD in the first 7 months after standard CRT were identified retrospectively. Imaging data included standard MRI anatomical sequences, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) maps. Median values (ADC, nrCBV) and RFs (all sequences) were calculated from DL-based tumor segmentations. Generalized linear models with LASSO feature-selection and DL models were built integrating clinical data, MGMT methylation status, median ADC and nrCBV values and RFs. RESULTS: A model based on clinical data and MGMT methylation status yielded an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.83) for detecting PsPD, and the addition of median ADC and nrCBV values resulted in a nonsignificant increase in performance (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.85, P = .416). Combining clinical/MGMT information with RFs derived from ADC, nrCBV, and from all available sequences both resulted in significantly (both P < .005) lower model performances, with AUC = 0.52 (0.38–0.66) and AUC = 0.54 (0.40–0.68), respectively. DL imaging models resulted in AUCs ≤ 0.56. CONCLUSION: Currently available imaging biomarkers could not reliably differentiate PsPD from true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma; larger collaborative efforts are needed to build more reliable models. Oxford University Press 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10034916/ /pubmed/36968291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Leone, Riccardo
Meredig, Hagen
Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha
Sahm, Felix
Hamelmann, Stefan
Kurz, Felix
Kessler, Tobias
Bonekamp, David
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Bo Hansen, Mikkel
Wick, Wolfgang
Bendszus, Martin
Vollmuth, Philipp
Brugnara, Gianluca
Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title_full Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title_fullStr Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title_short Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
title_sort assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016
work_keys_str_mv AT leonericcardo assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT meredighagen assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT foltyndumitrumartha assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT sahmfelix assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT hamelmannstefan assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT kurzfelix assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT kesslertobias assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT bonekampdavid assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT schlemmerheinzpeter assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT bohansenmikkel assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT wickwolfgang assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT bendszusmartin assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT vollmuthphilipp assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma
AT brugnaragianluca assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma