Cargando…
Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma
BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016 |
_version_ | 1784911311905226752 |
---|---|
author | Leone, Riccardo Meredig, Hagen Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha Sahm, Felix Hamelmann, Stefan Kurz, Felix Kessler, Tobias Bonekamp, David Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Bo Hansen, Mikkel Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca |
author_facet | Leone, Riccardo Meredig, Hagen Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha Sahm, Felix Hamelmann, Stefan Kurz, Felix Kessler, Tobias Bonekamp, David Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Bo Hansen, Mikkel Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca |
author_sort | Leone, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an accurate differential diagnosis. Here, we tested these parameters and combined them with radiomic features (RFs), clinical data, and MGMT promoter methylation status using machine- and deep-learning (DL) models to distinguish PsPD from Progressive disease. METHODS: In a single-center analysis, 105 patients with GB who developed a suspected imaging PsPD in the first 7 months after standard CRT were identified retrospectively. Imaging data included standard MRI anatomical sequences, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) maps. Median values (ADC, nrCBV) and RFs (all sequences) were calculated from DL-based tumor segmentations. Generalized linear models with LASSO feature-selection and DL models were built integrating clinical data, MGMT methylation status, median ADC and nrCBV values and RFs. RESULTS: A model based on clinical data and MGMT methylation status yielded an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.83) for detecting PsPD, and the addition of median ADC and nrCBV values resulted in a nonsignificant increase in performance (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.85, P = .416). Combining clinical/MGMT information with RFs derived from ADC, nrCBV, and from all available sequences both resulted in significantly (both P < .005) lower model performances, with AUC = 0.52 (0.38–0.66) and AUC = 0.54 (0.40–0.68), respectively. DL imaging models resulted in AUCs ≤ 0.56. CONCLUSION: Currently available imaging biomarkers could not reliably differentiate PsPD from true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma; larger collaborative efforts are needed to build more reliable models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10034916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100349162023-03-24 Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma Leone, Riccardo Meredig, Hagen Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha Sahm, Felix Hamelmann, Stefan Kurz, Felix Kessler, Tobias Bonekamp, David Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Bo Hansen, Mikkel Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a major diagnostic challenge in the follow-up of patients with glioblastoma (GB) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Conventional imaging signs and parameters derived from diffusion and perfusion-MRI have yet to prove their reliability in clinical practice for an accurate differential diagnosis. Here, we tested these parameters and combined them with radiomic features (RFs), clinical data, and MGMT promoter methylation status using machine- and deep-learning (DL) models to distinguish PsPD from Progressive disease. METHODS: In a single-center analysis, 105 patients with GB who developed a suspected imaging PsPD in the first 7 months after standard CRT were identified retrospectively. Imaging data included standard MRI anatomical sequences, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) maps. Median values (ADC, nrCBV) and RFs (all sequences) were calculated from DL-based tumor segmentations. Generalized linear models with LASSO feature-selection and DL models were built integrating clinical data, MGMT methylation status, median ADC and nrCBV values and RFs. RESULTS: A model based on clinical data and MGMT methylation status yielded an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.69 (95% CI 0.55–0.83) for detecting PsPD, and the addition of median ADC and nrCBV values resulted in a nonsignificant increase in performance (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.85, P = .416). Combining clinical/MGMT information with RFs derived from ADC, nrCBV, and from all available sequences both resulted in significantly (both P < .005) lower model performances, with AUC = 0.52 (0.38–0.66) and AUC = 0.54 (0.40–0.68), respectively. DL imaging models resulted in AUCs ≤ 0.56. CONCLUSION: Currently available imaging biomarkers could not reliably differentiate PsPD from true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma; larger collaborative efforts are needed to build more reliable models. Oxford University Press 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10034916/ /pubmed/36968291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Leone, Riccardo Meredig, Hagen Foltyn-Dumitru, Martha Sahm, Felix Hamelmann, Stefan Kurz, Felix Kessler, Tobias Bonekamp, David Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Bo Hansen, Mikkel Wick, Wolfgang Bendszus, Martin Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title | Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title_full | Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title_short | Assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
title_sort | assessing the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient, cerebral blood volume, and radiomic magnetic resonance features for differentiation of pseudoprogression versus true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36968291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonericcardo assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT meredighagen assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT foltyndumitrumartha assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT sahmfelix assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT hamelmannstefan assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT kurzfelix assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT kesslertobias assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT bonekampdavid assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT schlemmerheinzpeter assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT bohansenmikkel assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT wickwolfgang assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT bendszusmartin assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT vollmuthphilipp assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma AT brugnaragianluca assessingtheaddedvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientcerebralbloodvolumeandradiomicmagneticresonancefeaturesfordifferentiationofpseudoprogressionversustruetumorprogressioninpatientswithglioblastoma |