Cargando…
Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: There is still no consensus on the optimal time of oocyte–sperm co-incubation during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of brief (1-6 h) and long (16-24 h) gametes co-incubation time on IVF outcomes. METHODS: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05490-z |
_version_ | 1784911350292545536 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Yiyue Wu, Zeyu Peng, Fang Peng, Hongyao Liang, Xin Zhu, Shaomi |
author_facet | Fan, Yiyue Wu, Zeyu Peng, Fang Peng, Hongyao Liang, Xin Zhu, Shaomi |
author_sort | Fan, Yiyue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is still no consensus on the optimal time of oocyte–sperm co-incubation during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of brief (1-6 h) and long (16-24 h) gametes co-incubation time on IVF outcomes. METHODS: The study protocol was registered online through PROSPERO (CRD42022337503) and PRISMA guidelines were followed in the present study. The following databases were searched from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, using search terms related to IVF, gametes, time of co-incubation and reproductive outcome measure. Studies comparing outcomes of brief co-incubation to that of long co-incubation during IVF, and reporting primary outcome (live birth rate), secondary outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate; ongoing pregnancy rate; miscarriage rate; normal fertilization rate; polyspermy rate; top-quality embryo rate; implantation rate) were searched. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the data. Statistical heterogeneity analysis between studies was assessed by Cochran Q and I(2) statistic with a significant threshold of P < 0.05. Methodologic quality assessment of RCTs was made for potential risk of bias with Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Compared to long-term co-incubation, brief co-incubation had an advantage in increasing implantation rate (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.52–2.57), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.44–3.29) and top-quality embryo rate (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35). However, brief co-incubation of gametes had no advantages in the live-birth rate (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.72–1.65), miscarriage rate (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.55–3.18), clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.87) and polyspermy rate (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48–1.33) than long-term co-incubation. Additionally, the brief co-incubation was associated with lower normal fertilization rate (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.99), compared with long co-incubation. CONCLUSIONS: Brief co-incubation of gametes had the advantages in increasing implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and top-quality embryo rate than long-term co-incubation. However, the live-birth rate displayed no difference between the two in vitro fertilization methods. Gametes co-incubation time should be individualized according to each patient’s IVF history, infertility causes and the semen parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10035113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100351132023-03-24 Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Fan, Yiyue Wu, Zeyu Peng, Fang Peng, Hongyao Liang, Xin Zhu, Shaomi BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: There is still no consensus on the optimal time of oocyte–sperm co-incubation during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of brief (1-6 h) and long (16-24 h) gametes co-incubation time on IVF outcomes. METHODS: The study protocol was registered online through PROSPERO (CRD42022337503) and PRISMA guidelines were followed in the present study. The following databases were searched from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, using search terms related to IVF, gametes, time of co-incubation and reproductive outcome measure. Studies comparing outcomes of brief co-incubation to that of long co-incubation during IVF, and reporting primary outcome (live birth rate), secondary outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate; ongoing pregnancy rate; miscarriage rate; normal fertilization rate; polyspermy rate; top-quality embryo rate; implantation rate) were searched. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the data. Statistical heterogeneity analysis between studies was assessed by Cochran Q and I(2) statistic with a significant threshold of P < 0.05. Methodologic quality assessment of RCTs was made for potential risk of bias with Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Compared to long-term co-incubation, brief co-incubation had an advantage in increasing implantation rate (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.52–2.57), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.44–3.29) and top-quality embryo rate (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35). However, brief co-incubation of gametes had no advantages in the live-birth rate (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.72–1.65), miscarriage rate (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.55–3.18), clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99–1.87) and polyspermy rate (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48–1.33) than long-term co-incubation. Additionally, the brief co-incubation was associated with lower normal fertilization rate (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.99), compared with long co-incubation. CONCLUSIONS: Brief co-incubation of gametes had the advantages in increasing implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and top-quality embryo rate than long-term co-incubation. However, the live-birth rate displayed no difference between the two in vitro fertilization methods. Gametes co-incubation time should be individualized according to each patient’s IVF history, infertility causes and the semen parameters. BioMed Central 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10035113/ /pubmed/36959550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05490-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fan, Yiyue Wu, Zeyu Peng, Fang Peng, Hongyao Liang, Xin Zhu, Shaomi Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | brief and long co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05490-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanyiyue briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuzeyu briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT pengfang briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT penghongyao briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liangxin briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhushaomi briefandlongcoincubationofspermandoocytesforinvitrofertilizationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |