Cargando…

Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Posterior pelvis ring injuries represent typical high-energy trauma injuries in young adults. Joint stabilization with two cannulated sacroiliac (SI) screws at the level of sacral vertebrae S1 and S2 is a well-established procedure. However, high failure- and implant removal (IR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berk, Till, Zderic, Ivan, Varga, Peter, Schwarzenberg, Peter, Lesche, Felix, Halvachizadeh, Sascha, Richards, Geoff, Gueorguiev, Boyko, Pape, Hans-Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06312-1
_version_ 1784911368365801472
author Berk, Till
Zderic, Ivan
Varga, Peter
Schwarzenberg, Peter
Lesche, Felix
Halvachizadeh, Sascha
Richards, Geoff
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Pape, Hans-Christoph
author_facet Berk, Till
Zderic, Ivan
Varga, Peter
Schwarzenberg, Peter
Lesche, Felix
Halvachizadeh, Sascha
Richards, Geoff
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Pape, Hans-Christoph
author_sort Berk, Till
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Posterior pelvis ring injuries represent typical high-energy trauma injuries in young adults. Joint stabilization with two cannulated sacroiliac (SI) screws at the level of sacral vertebrae S1 and S2 is a well-established procedure. However, high failure- and implant removal (IR) rates have been reported. Especially, the washer recovery can pose the most difficult part of the IR surgery, which is often associated with complications. The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate the stability of S1-S2 fixation of the SI joint using three different screw designs. METHODS: Eighteen artificial hemi-pelvises were assigned to three groups (n = 6) for SI joint stabilization through S1 and S2 corridors using either two 7.5 mm cannulated compression headless screws (group CCH), two 7.3 mm partially threaded SI screws (group PT), or two 7.3 mm fully threaded SI screws (group FT). An SI joint dislocation injury type III APC according to the Young and Burgess classification was simulated before implantation. All specimens were biomechanically tested to failure in upright standing position under progressively increasing cyclic loading. Interfragmentary and bone-implant movements were captured via motion tracking and evaluated at four time points between 4000 and 7000 cycles. RESULTS: Combined interfragmentary angular displacement movements in coronal and transverse plane between ilium and sacrum, evaluated over the measured four time points, were significantly bigger in group FT versus both groups CCH and PT, p ≤ 0.047. In addition, angular displacement of the screw axis within the ilium under consideration of both these planes was significantly bigger in group FT versus group PT, p = 0.038. However, no significant differences were observed among the groups for screw tip cutout movements in the sacrum, p = 0.321. Cycles to failure were highest in group PT (9885 ± 1712), followed by group CCH (9820 ± 597), and group FT (7202 ± 1087), being significantly lower in group FT compared to both groups CCH and PT, p ≤ 0.027. CONCLUSION: From a biomechanical perspective, S1-S2 SI joint fixation using two cannulated compression headless screws or two partially threaded SI screws exhibited better interfragmentary stability compared to two fully threaded SI screws. The former can therefore be considered as a valid alternative to standard SI screw fixation in posterior pelvis ring injuries. In addition, partially threaded screw fixation was associated with less bone-implant movements versus fully threaded screw fixation. Further human cadaveric biomechanical studies with larger sample size should be initiated to understand better the potential of cannulated compression headless screw fixation for the therapy of the injured posterior pelvis ring in young trauma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10035201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100352012023-03-24 Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study Berk, Till Zderic, Ivan Varga, Peter Schwarzenberg, Peter Lesche, Felix Halvachizadeh, Sascha Richards, Geoff Gueorguiev, Boyko Pape, Hans-Christoph BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Posterior pelvis ring injuries represent typical high-energy trauma injuries in young adults. Joint stabilization with two cannulated sacroiliac (SI) screws at the level of sacral vertebrae S1 and S2 is a well-established procedure. However, high failure- and implant removal (IR) rates have been reported. Especially, the washer recovery can pose the most difficult part of the IR surgery, which is often associated with complications. The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate the stability of S1-S2 fixation of the SI joint using three different screw designs. METHODS: Eighteen artificial hemi-pelvises were assigned to three groups (n = 6) for SI joint stabilization through S1 and S2 corridors using either two 7.5 mm cannulated compression headless screws (group CCH), two 7.3 mm partially threaded SI screws (group PT), or two 7.3 mm fully threaded SI screws (group FT). An SI joint dislocation injury type III APC according to the Young and Burgess classification was simulated before implantation. All specimens were biomechanically tested to failure in upright standing position under progressively increasing cyclic loading. Interfragmentary and bone-implant movements were captured via motion tracking and evaluated at four time points between 4000 and 7000 cycles. RESULTS: Combined interfragmentary angular displacement movements in coronal and transverse plane between ilium and sacrum, evaluated over the measured four time points, were significantly bigger in group FT versus both groups CCH and PT, p ≤ 0.047. In addition, angular displacement of the screw axis within the ilium under consideration of both these planes was significantly bigger in group FT versus group PT, p = 0.038. However, no significant differences were observed among the groups for screw tip cutout movements in the sacrum, p = 0.321. Cycles to failure were highest in group PT (9885 ± 1712), followed by group CCH (9820 ± 597), and group FT (7202 ± 1087), being significantly lower in group FT compared to both groups CCH and PT, p ≤ 0.027. CONCLUSION: From a biomechanical perspective, S1-S2 SI joint fixation using two cannulated compression headless screws or two partially threaded SI screws exhibited better interfragmentary stability compared to two fully threaded SI screws. The former can therefore be considered as a valid alternative to standard SI screw fixation in posterior pelvis ring injuries. In addition, partially threaded screw fixation was associated with less bone-implant movements versus fully threaded screw fixation. Further human cadaveric biomechanical studies with larger sample size should be initiated to understand better the potential of cannulated compression headless screw fixation for the therapy of the injured posterior pelvis ring in young trauma patients. BioMed Central 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10035201/ /pubmed/36949409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06312-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Berk, Till
Zderic, Ivan
Varga, Peter
Schwarzenberg, Peter
Lesche, Felix
Halvachizadeh, Sascha
Richards, Geoff
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title_full Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title_short Evaluation of Cannulated Compression Headless Screw (CCHS) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard S1-S2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
title_sort evaluation of cannulated compression headless screw (cchs) as an alternative implant in comparison to standard s1-s2 screw fixation of the posterior pelvis ring: a biomechanical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06312-1
work_keys_str_mv AT berktill evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT zdericivan evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT vargapeter evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT schwarzenbergpeter evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT leschefelix evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT halvachizadehsascha evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT richardsgeoff evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT gueorguievboyko evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy
AT papehanschristoph evaluationofcannulatedcompressionheadlessscrewcchsasanalternativeimplantincomparisontostandards1s2screwfixationoftheposteriorpelvisringabiomechanicalstudy