Cargando…

Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Many patients do not fully regain motor function after ischemic stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the motor cortex may improve motor outcome as an add-on intervention to physical rehabilitation. However, beneficial effects on motor function vary largely amo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolmos, Mia, Madsen, Mads Just, Liu, Marie Louise, Karabanov, Anke, Johansen, Katrine Lyders, Thielscher, Axel, Gandrup, Karen, Lundell, Henrik, Fuglsang, Søren, Thade, Esben, Christensen, Hanne, Iversen, Helle Klingenberg, Siebner, Hartwig Roman, Kruuse, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07234-y
_version_ 1784911385073811456
author Kolmos, Mia
Madsen, Mads Just
Liu, Marie Louise
Karabanov, Anke
Johansen, Katrine Lyders
Thielscher, Axel
Gandrup, Karen
Lundell, Henrik
Fuglsang, Søren
Thade, Esben
Christensen, Hanne
Iversen, Helle Klingenberg
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Kruuse, Christina
author_facet Kolmos, Mia
Madsen, Mads Just
Liu, Marie Louise
Karabanov, Anke
Johansen, Katrine Lyders
Thielscher, Axel
Gandrup, Karen
Lundell, Henrik
Fuglsang, Søren
Thade, Esben
Christensen, Hanne
Iversen, Helle Klingenberg
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Kruuse, Christina
author_sort Kolmos, Mia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many patients do not fully regain motor function after ischemic stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the motor cortex may improve motor outcome as an add-on intervention to physical rehabilitation. However, beneficial effects on motor function vary largely among patients within and across TDCS trials. In addition to a large heterogeneity of study designs, this variability may be caused by the fact that TDCS was given as a one-size-fits-all protocol without accounting for anatomical differences between subjects. The efficacy and consistency of TDCS might be improved by a patient-tailored design that ensures precise targeting of a physiologically relevant area with an appropriate current strength. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, patients with subacute ischemic stroke and residual upper-extremity paresis will receive two times 20 min of focal TDCS of ipsilesional primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) during supervised rehabilitation training three times weekly for 4 weeks. Anticipated 60 patients will be randomly assigned to active or sham TDCS of ipsilesional M1-HAND, using a central anode and four equidistant cathodes. The placement of the electrode grid on the scalp and current strength at each cathode will be personalized based on individual electrical field models to induce an electrical current of 0.2 V/m in the cortical target region resulting in current strengths between 1 and 4 mA. Primary endpoint will be the difference in change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score between active TDCS and sham at the end of the intervention. Exploratory endpoints will include UE-FMA at 12 weeks. Effects of TDCS on motor network connectivity and interhemispheric inhibition will be assessed with functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation. DISCUSSION: The study will show the feasibility and test the efficacy of personalized, multi-electrode anodal TDCS of M1-HAND in patients with subacute stroke patients with upper-extremity paresis. Concurrent multimodal brain mapping will shed light into the mechanisms of action of therapeutic personalized TDCS of M1-HAND. Together, the results from this trial may inform future personalized TDCS studies in patients with focal neurological deficits after stroke. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07234-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10035265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100352652023-03-24 Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial Kolmos, Mia Madsen, Mads Just Liu, Marie Louise Karabanov, Anke Johansen, Katrine Lyders Thielscher, Axel Gandrup, Karen Lundell, Henrik Fuglsang, Søren Thade, Esben Christensen, Hanne Iversen, Helle Klingenberg Siebner, Hartwig Roman Kruuse, Christina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Many patients do not fully regain motor function after ischemic stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the motor cortex may improve motor outcome as an add-on intervention to physical rehabilitation. However, beneficial effects on motor function vary largely among patients within and across TDCS trials. In addition to a large heterogeneity of study designs, this variability may be caused by the fact that TDCS was given as a one-size-fits-all protocol without accounting for anatomical differences between subjects. The efficacy and consistency of TDCS might be improved by a patient-tailored design that ensures precise targeting of a physiologically relevant area with an appropriate current strength. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, patients with subacute ischemic stroke and residual upper-extremity paresis will receive two times 20 min of focal TDCS of ipsilesional primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) during supervised rehabilitation training three times weekly for 4 weeks. Anticipated 60 patients will be randomly assigned to active or sham TDCS of ipsilesional M1-HAND, using a central anode and four equidistant cathodes. The placement of the electrode grid on the scalp and current strength at each cathode will be personalized based on individual electrical field models to induce an electrical current of 0.2 V/m in the cortical target region resulting in current strengths between 1 and 4 mA. Primary endpoint will be the difference in change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score between active TDCS and sham at the end of the intervention. Exploratory endpoints will include UE-FMA at 12 weeks. Effects of TDCS on motor network connectivity and interhemispheric inhibition will be assessed with functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation. DISCUSSION: The study will show the feasibility and test the efficacy of personalized, multi-electrode anodal TDCS of M1-HAND in patients with subacute stroke patients with upper-extremity paresis. Concurrent multimodal brain mapping will shed light into the mechanisms of action of therapeutic personalized TDCS of M1-HAND. Together, the results from this trial may inform future personalized TDCS studies in patients with focal neurological deficits after stroke. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07234-y. BioMed Central 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10035265/ /pubmed/36949490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07234-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kolmos, Mia
Madsen, Mads Just
Liu, Marie Louise
Karabanov, Anke
Johansen, Katrine Lyders
Thielscher, Axel
Gandrup, Karen
Lundell, Henrik
Fuglsang, Søren
Thade, Esben
Christensen, Hanne
Iversen, Helle Klingenberg
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Kruuse, Christina
Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title_full Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title_fullStr Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title_short Patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
title_sort patient-tailored transcranial direct current stimulation to improve stroke rehabilitation: study protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36949490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07234-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kolmosmia patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT madsenmadsjust patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT liumarielouise patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT karabanovanke patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT johansenkatrinelyders patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT thielscheraxel patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT gandrupkaren patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT lundellhenrik patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT fuglsangsøren patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT thadeesben patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT christensenhanne patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT iversenhelleklingenberg patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT siebnerhartwigroman patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT kruusechristina patienttailoredtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtoimprovestrokerehabilitationstudyprotocolofarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial