Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis
In this prospective, observational, method comparison clinical study, the Xpert Xpress MVP test (MVP) was evaluated using both clinician-collected (CVS) and self-collected vaginal swabs (SVS) collected in a clinical setting. The study was conducted at 12 sites, including point-of-care (POC) settings...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01748-22 |
_version_ | 1784911392709541888 |
---|---|
author | Lillis, Rebecca A. Parker, R. Lamar Ackerman, Ronald Ackerman, Jamie Young, Stephen Weissfeld, Alice Trevino, Ernest Nachamkin, Irving Crane, LaShonda Brown, Jacqueline Huang, Christina Liu, Xiaohong Van Der Pol, Barbara |
author_facet | Lillis, Rebecca A. Parker, R. Lamar Ackerman, Ronald Ackerman, Jamie Young, Stephen Weissfeld, Alice Trevino, Ernest Nachamkin, Irving Crane, LaShonda Brown, Jacqueline Huang, Christina Liu, Xiaohong Van Der Pol, Barbara |
author_sort | Lillis, Rebecca A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this prospective, observational, method comparison clinical study, the Xpert Xpress MVP test (MVP) was evaluated using both clinician-collected (CVS) and self-collected vaginal swabs (SVS) collected in a clinical setting. The study was conducted at 12 sites, including point-of-care (POC) settings, from geographically diverse locations in the United States. Participants were biologically female patients ≥ 14 years old with signs and/or symptoms of vaginitis/vaginosis. MVP test results for BV were compared to the BD MAX Vaginal Panel (BDVP). Results for Candida group and Candida glabrata and Candida krusei targets (species not differentiated) were assessed relative to yeast culture followed by mass spectrometry for species identification. Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) results were compared relative to a composite method that included results from the BDVP and InPouch TV culture. The investigational test demonstrated high positive percent agreement ranging from 93.6 to 99.0%, and negative percent agreement ranging from 92.1% to 99.8% for both CVS and SVS specimens, indicating it may be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of vaginitis/vaginosis in laboratory and POC settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10035313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100353132023-03-24 Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis Lillis, Rebecca A. Parker, R. Lamar Ackerman, Ronald Ackerman, Jamie Young, Stephen Weissfeld, Alice Trevino, Ernest Nachamkin, Irving Crane, LaShonda Brown, Jacqueline Huang, Christina Liu, Xiaohong Van Der Pol, Barbara J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology In this prospective, observational, method comparison clinical study, the Xpert Xpress MVP test (MVP) was evaluated using both clinician-collected (CVS) and self-collected vaginal swabs (SVS) collected in a clinical setting. The study was conducted at 12 sites, including point-of-care (POC) settings, from geographically diverse locations in the United States. Participants were biologically female patients ≥ 14 years old with signs and/or symptoms of vaginitis/vaginosis. MVP test results for BV were compared to the BD MAX Vaginal Panel (BDVP). Results for Candida group and Candida glabrata and Candida krusei targets (species not differentiated) were assessed relative to yeast culture followed by mass spectrometry for species identification. Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) results were compared relative to a composite method that included results from the BDVP and InPouch TV culture. The investigational test demonstrated high positive percent agreement ranging from 93.6 to 99.0%, and negative percent agreement ranging from 92.1% to 99.8% for both CVS and SVS specimens, indicating it may be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of vaginitis/vaginosis in laboratory and POC settings. American Society for Microbiology 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10035313/ /pubmed/36853028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01748-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lillis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Bacteriology Lillis, Rebecca A. Parker, R. Lamar Ackerman, Ronald Ackerman, Jamie Young, Stephen Weissfeld, Alice Trevino, Ernest Nachamkin, Irving Crane, LaShonda Brown, Jacqueline Huang, Christina Liu, Xiaohong Van Der Pol, Barbara Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title | Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Test for the Detection of Organisms Causing Vaginitis and Vaginosis |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of a new molecular test for the detection of organisms causing vaginitis and vaginosis |
topic | Bacteriology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01748-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lillisrebeccaa clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT parkerrlamar clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT ackermanronald clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT ackermanjamie clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT youngstephen clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT weissfeldalice clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT trevinoernest clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT nachamkinirving clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT cranelashonda clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT brownjacqueline clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT huangchristina clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT liuxiaohong clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis AT vanderpolbarbara clinicalevaluationofanewmoleculartestforthedetectionoforganismscausingvaginitisandvaginosis |