Cargando…

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Hoon, Kim, Na Hye, Kim, Jin Dong, Kim, Young Nam, Kim, Yu Jin, Kim, Eun Jung, Yoo, Ki Deok, Ryu, Choong Heon, Song, Ha Hun, Kim, Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Liver Cancer Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383084
http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20
_version_ 1784911464032632832
author Kim, Tae Hoon
Kim, Na Hye
Kim, Jin Dong
Kim, Young Nam
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Eun Jung
Yoo, Ki Deok
Ryu, Choong Heon
Song, Ha Hun
Kim, Hyun
author_facet Kim, Tae Hoon
Kim, Na Hye
Kim, Jin Dong
Kim, Young Nam
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Eun Jung
Yoo, Ki Deok
Ryu, Choong Heon
Song, Ha Hun
Kim, Hyun
author_sort Kim, Tae Hoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC. METHODS: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4–102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10035690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Liver Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100356902023-06-28 Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Yoo, Ki Deok Ryu, Choong Heon Song, Ha Hun Kim, Hyun J Liver Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC. METHODS: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4–102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible. Korean Liver Cancer Association 2021-09 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10035690/ /pubmed/37383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Liver Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Tae Hoon
Kim, Na Hye
Kim, Jin Dong
Kim, Young Nam
Kim, Yu Jin
Kim, Eun Jung
Yoo, Ki Deok
Ryu, Choong Heon
Song, Ha Hun
Kim, Hyun
Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title_full Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title_fullStr Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title_short Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
title_sort transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383084
http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehoon transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimnahye transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimjindong transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimyoungnam transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimyujin transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimeunjung transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT yookideok transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT ryuchoongheon transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT songhahun transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial
AT kimhyun transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial