Cargando…
Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Liver Cancer Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20 |
_version_ | 1784911464032632832 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Yoo, Ki Deok Ryu, Choong Heon Song, Ha Hun Kim, Hyun |
author_facet | Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Yoo, Ki Deok Ryu, Choong Heon Song, Ha Hun Kim, Hyun |
author_sort | Kim, Tae Hoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC. METHODS: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4–102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10035690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Liver Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100356902023-06-28 Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Yoo, Ki Deok Ryu, Choong Heon Song, Ha Hun Kim, Hyun J Liver Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC. METHODS: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4–102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible. Korean Liver Cancer Association 2021-09 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10035690/ /pubmed/37383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Liver Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Yoo, Ki Deok Ryu, Choong Heon Song, Ha Hun Kim, Hyun Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title | Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title_full | Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title_short | Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
title_sort | transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383084 http://dx.doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimtaehoon transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimnahye transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimjindong transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimyoungnam transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimyujin transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimeunjung transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT yookideok transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT ryuchoongheon transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT songhahun transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial AT kimhyun transarterialchemoembolizationusingdrugelutingbeadcomparedwithradiofrequencyablationfortreatmentofsinglesmallhepatocellularcarcinomaapilotnonrandomizedtrial |