Cargando…
Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Phase angle (PhA) has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to achieve a systematic review, where we discussed the potential role of PhA value as a prognostic marker of adverse clinical outcomes such as mortality and complication in hospitalized with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11154-023-09793-6 |
_version_ | 1784911607254482944 |
---|---|
author | Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel Vegas-Aguilar, Isabel M. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío García-García, Cristina Bellido-Guerrero, Diego Tinahones, Francisco García-Almeida, Jose Manuel |
author_facet | Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel Vegas-Aguilar, Isabel M. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío García-García, Cristina Bellido-Guerrero, Diego Tinahones, Francisco García-Almeida, Jose Manuel |
author_sort | Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phase angle (PhA) has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to achieve a systematic review, where we discussed the potential role of PhA value as a prognostic marker of adverse clinical outcomes such as mortality and complication in hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection and established the strength of recommendations for use. A systematic literature review with meta-analysis was done in the main electronic databases from 2020 to January 2023. The selected articles had to investigate adverse consequences of the COVID-19 population and raw bioimpedance parameters such as PhA and published in peer-reviewed journals. GRADE tools regarded the quality of the methodology. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Only eight studies, 483 studies, were eligible for the analysis. In general, differences in PhA were seen between the comparative study groups. Patients with a low PhA experienced poor outcomes. A low PhA was associated with a significantly increased mortality risk [RR: 2.44; 95% CI (1.20–4.99), p = 0.01; I2 = 79% (p = 0.0008)] and higher complications risk [OR: 3.47, 95% CI (1.16 – 10.37), p = 0.03; I2 = 82% (p = 0.004)] in COVID-19 patients. Our analysis showed four evidence-based recommendations on the prognostic value of PhA with two strong recommendations, one of moderate and another of low-moderate quality, for predicting mortality and complications, respectively. We recommend using PhA as a prognostic marker for mortality and complications in this population. Although the results are promising, future studies must identify the PhA cut-off to guide therapeutic decisions more precisely. Registration code in PROSPERO: CRD42023391044 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10036242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100362422023-03-24 Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel Vegas-Aguilar, Isabel M. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío García-García, Cristina Bellido-Guerrero, Diego Tinahones, Francisco García-Almeida, Jose Manuel Rev Endocr Metab Disord Article Phase angle (PhA) has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to achieve a systematic review, where we discussed the potential role of PhA value as a prognostic marker of adverse clinical outcomes such as mortality and complication in hospitalized with SARS-CoV2 infection and established the strength of recommendations for use. A systematic literature review with meta-analysis was done in the main electronic databases from 2020 to January 2023. The selected articles had to investigate adverse consequences of the COVID-19 population and raw bioimpedance parameters such as PhA and published in peer-reviewed journals. GRADE tools regarded the quality of the methodology. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Only eight studies, 483 studies, were eligible for the analysis. In general, differences in PhA were seen between the comparative study groups. Patients with a low PhA experienced poor outcomes. A low PhA was associated with a significantly increased mortality risk [RR: 2.44; 95% CI (1.20–4.99), p = 0.01; I2 = 79% (p = 0.0008)] and higher complications risk [OR: 3.47, 95% CI (1.16 – 10.37), p = 0.03; I2 = 82% (p = 0.004)] in COVID-19 patients. Our analysis showed four evidence-based recommendations on the prognostic value of PhA with two strong recommendations, one of moderate and another of low-moderate quality, for predicting mortality and complications, respectively. We recommend using PhA as a prognostic marker for mortality and complications in this population. Although the results are promising, future studies must identify the PhA cut-off to guide therapeutic decisions more precisely. Registration code in PROSPERO: CRD42023391044 Springer US 2023-03-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10036242/ /pubmed/36959397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11154-023-09793-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel Vegas-Aguilar, Isabel M. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío García-García, Cristina Bellido-Guerrero, Diego Tinahones, Francisco García-Almeida, Jose Manuel Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title | Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full | Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_short | Phase angle and COVID-19: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_sort | phase angle and covid-19: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11154-023-09793-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornejoparejaisabel phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT vegasaguilarisabelm phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT fernandezjimenezrocio phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT garciagarciacristina phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT bellidoguerrerodiego phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT tinahonesfrancisco phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT garciaalmeidajosemanuel phaseangleandcovid19asystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |