Cargando…

Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops

KEY MESSAGE: For genomic selection in clonally propagated crops with diploid (-like) meiotic behavior to be effective, crossing parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross-performance unless dominance is negligible. ABSTRACT: For genomic selection (GS) in clonal breeding programs to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werner, Christian R., Gaynor, R. Chris, Sargent, Daniel J., Lillo, Alessandra, Gorjanc, Gregor, Hickey, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04300-6
_version_ 1784911651137388544
author Werner, Christian R.
Gaynor, R. Chris
Sargent, Daniel J.
Lillo, Alessandra
Gorjanc, Gregor
Hickey, John M.
author_facet Werner, Christian R.
Gaynor, R. Chris
Sargent, Daniel J.
Lillo, Alessandra
Gorjanc, Gregor
Hickey, John M.
author_sort Werner, Christian R.
collection PubMed
description KEY MESSAGE: For genomic selection in clonally propagated crops with diploid (-like) meiotic behavior to be effective, crossing parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross-performance unless dominance is negligible. ABSTRACT: For genomic selection (GS) in clonal breeding programs to be effective, parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross-performance unless dominance is negligible. Genomic prediction of cross-performance enables efficient exploitation of the additive and dominance value simultaneously. Here, we compared different GS strategies for clonally propagated crops with diploid (-like) meiotic behavior, using strawberry as an example. We used stochastic simulation to evaluate six combinations of three breeding programs and two parent selection methods. The three breeding programs included (1) a breeding program that introduced GS in the first clonal stage, and (2) two variations of a two-part breeding program with one and three crossing cycles per year, respectively. The two parent selection methods were (1) parent selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and (2) parent selection based on genomic predicted cross-performance (GPCP). Selection of parents based on GPCP produced faster genetic gain than selection of parents based on GEBVs because it reduced inbreeding when the dominance degree increased. The two-part breeding programs with one and three crossing cycles per year using GPCP always produced the most genetic gain unless dominance was negligible. We conclude that (1) in clonal breeding programs with GS, parents should be selected based on GPCP, and (2) a two-part breeding program with parent selection based on GPCP to rapidly drive population improvement has great potential to improve breeding clonally propagated crops. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-023-04300-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100364242023-03-25 Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops Werner, Christian R. Gaynor, R. Chris Sargent, Daniel J. Lillo, Alessandra Gorjanc, Gregor Hickey, John M. Theor Appl Genet Original Article KEY MESSAGE: For genomic selection in clonally propagated crops with diploid (-like) meiotic behavior to be effective, crossing parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross-performance unless dominance is negligible. ABSTRACT: For genomic selection (GS) in clonal breeding programs to be effective, parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross-performance unless dominance is negligible. Genomic prediction of cross-performance enables efficient exploitation of the additive and dominance value simultaneously. Here, we compared different GS strategies for clonally propagated crops with diploid (-like) meiotic behavior, using strawberry as an example. We used stochastic simulation to evaluate six combinations of three breeding programs and two parent selection methods. The three breeding programs included (1) a breeding program that introduced GS in the first clonal stage, and (2) two variations of a two-part breeding program with one and three crossing cycles per year, respectively. The two parent selection methods were (1) parent selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and (2) parent selection based on genomic predicted cross-performance (GPCP). Selection of parents based on GPCP produced faster genetic gain than selection of parents based on GEBVs because it reduced inbreeding when the dominance degree increased. The two-part breeding programs with one and three crossing cycles per year using GPCP always produced the most genetic gain unless dominance was negligible. We conclude that (1) in clonal breeding programs with GS, parents should be selected based on GPCP, and (2) a two-part breeding program with parent selection based on GPCP to rapidly drive population improvement has great potential to improve breeding clonally propagated crops. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00122-023-04300-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10036424/ /pubmed/36952013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04300-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Werner, Christian R.
Gaynor, R. Chris
Sargent, Daniel J.
Lillo, Alessandra
Gorjanc, Gregor
Hickey, John M.
Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title_full Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title_fullStr Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title_short Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
title_sort genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04300-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wernerchristianr genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops
AT gaynorrchris genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops
AT sargentdanielj genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops
AT lilloalessandra genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops
AT gorjancgregor genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops
AT hickeyjohnm genomicselectionstrategiesforclonallypropagatedcrops