Cargando…
Update rules and semantic universals
We discuss a well-known puzzle about the lexicalization of logical operators in natural language, in particular connectives and quantifiers. Of the many logically possible operators, only few appear in the lexicon of natural languages: the connectives in English, for example, are conjunction and, di...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36974334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09362-1 |
_version_ | 1784911659624562688 |
---|---|
author | Incurvati, Luca Sbardolini, Giorgio |
author_facet | Incurvati, Luca Sbardolini, Giorgio |
author_sort | Incurvati, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | We discuss a well-known puzzle about the lexicalization of logical operators in natural language, in particular connectives and quantifiers. Of the many logically possible operators, only few appear in the lexicon of natural languages: the connectives in English, for example, are conjunction and, disjunction or, and negated disjunction nor; the lexical quantifiers are all, some and no. The logically possible nand (negated conjunction) and Nall (negated universal) are not expressed by lexical entries in English, nor in any natural language. Moreover, the lexicalized operators are all upward or downward monotone, an observation known as the Monotonicity Universal. We propose a logical explanation of lexical gaps and of the Monotonicity Universal, based on the dynamic behaviour of connectives and quantifiers. We define update potentials for logical operators as procedures to modify the context, under the assumption that an update by [Formula: see text] depends on the logical form of [Formula: see text] and on the speech act performed: assertion or rejection. We conjecture that the adequacy of update potentials determines the limits of lexicalizability for logical operators in natural language. Finally, we show that on this framework the Monotonicity Universal follows from the logical properties of the updates that correspond to each operator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10036462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100364622023-03-25 Update rules and semantic universals Incurvati, Luca Sbardolini, Giorgio Linguist Philos Original Research We discuss a well-known puzzle about the lexicalization of logical operators in natural language, in particular connectives and quantifiers. Of the many logically possible operators, only few appear in the lexicon of natural languages: the connectives in English, for example, are conjunction and, disjunction or, and negated disjunction nor; the lexical quantifiers are all, some and no. The logically possible nand (negated conjunction) and Nall (negated universal) are not expressed by lexical entries in English, nor in any natural language. Moreover, the lexicalized operators are all upward or downward monotone, an observation known as the Monotonicity Universal. We propose a logical explanation of lexical gaps and of the Monotonicity Universal, based on the dynamic behaviour of connectives and quantifiers. We define update potentials for logical operators as procedures to modify the context, under the assumption that an update by [Formula: see text] depends on the logical form of [Formula: see text] and on the speech act performed: assertion or rejection. We conjecture that the adequacy of update potentials determines the limits of lexicalizability for logical operators in natural language. Finally, we show that on this framework the Monotonicity Universal follows from the logical properties of the updates that correspond to each operator. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10036462/ /pubmed/36974334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09362-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Incurvati, Luca Sbardolini, Giorgio Update rules and semantic universals |
title | Update rules and semantic universals |
title_full | Update rules and semantic universals |
title_fullStr | Update rules and semantic universals |
title_full_unstemmed | Update rules and semantic universals |
title_short | Update rules and semantic universals |
title_sort | update rules and semantic universals |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36974334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09362-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT incurvatiluca updaterulesandsemanticuniversals AT sbardolinigiorgio updaterulesandsemanticuniversals |