Cargando…

Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning

Nearly ~ 10(8) types of High entropy alloys (HEAs) can be developed from about 64 elements in the periodic table. A major challenge for materials scientists and metallurgists at this stage is to predict their crystal structure and, therefore, their mechanical properties to reduce experimental effort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Swati, Katiyar, Nirmal Kumar, Goel, Saurav, Joshi, Shrikrishna N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31461-7
_version_ 1784911665800675328
author Singh, Swati
Katiyar, Nirmal Kumar
Goel, Saurav
Joshi, Shrikrishna N.
author_facet Singh, Swati
Katiyar, Nirmal Kumar
Goel, Saurav
Joshi, Shrikrishna N.
author_sort Singh, Swati
collection PubMed
description Nearly ~ 10(8) types of High entropy alloys (HEAs) can be developed from about 64 elements in the periodic table. A major challenge for materials scientists and metallurgists at this stage is to predict their crystal structure and, therefore, their mechanical properties to reduce experimental efforts, which are energy and time intensive. Through this paper, we show that it is possible to use machine learning (ML) in this arena for phase prediction to develop novel HEAs. We tested five robust algorithms namely, K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree classifier (DTC), random forest classifier (RFC) and XGBoost (XGB) in their vanilla form (base models) on a large dataset screened specifically from experimental data concerning HEA fabrication using melting and casting manufacturing methods. This was necessary to avoid the discrepancy inherent with comparing HEAs obtained from different synthesis routes as it causes spurious effects while treating an imbalanced data—an erroneous practice we observed in the reported literature. We found that (i) RFC model predictions were more reliable in contrast to other models and (ii) the synthetic data augmentation is not a neat practice in materials science specially to develop HEAs, where it cannot assure phase information reliably. To substantiate our claim, we compared the vanilla RFC (V-RFC) model for original data (1200 datasets) with SMOTE-Tomek links augmented RFC (ST-RFC) model for the new datasets (1200 original + 192 generated = 1392 datasets). We found that although the ST-RFC model showed a higher average test accuracy of 92%, no significant breakthroughs were observed, when testing the number of correct and incorrect predictions using confusion matrix and ROC-AUC scores for individual phases. Based on our RFC model, we report the development of a new HEA (Ni(25)Cu(18.75)Fe(25)Co(25)Al(6.25)) exhibiting an FCC phase proving the robustness of our predictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100364872023-03-25 Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning Singh, Swati Katiyar, Nirmal Kumar Goel, Saurav Joshi, Shrikrishna N. Sci Rep Article Nearly ~ 10(8) types of High entropy alloys (HEAs) can be developed from about 64 elements in the periodic table. A major challenge for materials scientists and metallurgists at this stage is to predict their crystal structure and, therefore, their mechanical properties to reduce experimental efforts, which are energy and time intensive. Through this paper, we show that it is possible to use machine learning (ML) in this arena for phase prediction to develop novel HEAs. We tested five robust algorithms namely, K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree classifier (DTC), random forest classifier (RFC) and XGBoost (XGB) in their vanilla form (base models) on a large dataset screened specifically from experimental data concerning HEA fabrication using melting and casting manufacturing methods. This was necessary to avoid the discrepancy inherent with comparing HEAs obtained from different synthesis routes as it causes spurious effects while treating an imbalanced data—an erroneous practice we observed in the reported literature. We found that (i) RFC model predictions were more reliable in contrast to other models and (ii) the synthetic data augmentation is not a neat practice in materials science specially to develop HEAs, where it cannot assure phase information reliably. To substantiate our claim, we compared the vanilla RFC (V-RFC) model for original data (1200 datasets) with SMOTE-Tomek links augmented RFC (ST-RFC) model for the new datasets (1200 original + 192 generated = 1392 datasets). We found that although the ST-RFC model showed a higher average test accuracy of 92%, no significant breakthroughs were observed, when testing the number of correct and incorrect predictions using confusion matrix and ROC-AUC scores for individual phases. Based on our RFC model, we report the development of a new HEA (Ni(25)Cu(18.75)Fe(25)Co(25)Al(6.25)) exhibiting an FCC phase proving the robustness of our predictions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10036487/ /pubmed/36959265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31461-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Singh, Swati
Katiyar, Nirmal Kumar
Goel, Saurav
Joshi, Shrikrishna N.
Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title_full Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title_fullStr Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title_short Phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
title_sort phase prediction and experimental realisation of a new high entropy alloy using machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31461-7
work_keys_str_mv AT singhswati phasepredictionandexperimentalrealisationofanewhighentropyalloyusingmachinelearning
AT katiyarnirmalkumar phasepredictionandexperimentalrealisationofanewhighentropyalloyusingmachinelearning
AT goelsaurav phasepredictionandexperimentalrealisationofanewhighentropyalloyusingmachinelearning
AT joshishrikrishnan phasepredictionandexperimentalrealisationofanewhighentropyalloyusingmachinelearning