Cargando…

ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. The role of restorative neurostimulation in the treatment of patients with refractory mechanical CLBP and multifidus muscle dysfunction has been established in one randomized controlled trial (RC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilligan, Christopher, Burnside, Diane, Grant, Lisa, Yong, R. Jason, Mullins, Peter M., Schwab, Frank, Mekhail, Nagy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4
_version_ 1784911715465428992
author Gilligan, Christopher
Burnside, Diane
Grant, Lisa
Yong, R. Jason
Mullins, Peter M.
Schwab, Frank
Mekhail, Nagy
author_facet Gilligan, Christopher
Burnside, Diane
Grant, Lisa
Yong, R. Jason
Mullins, Peter M.
Schwab, Frank
Mekhail, Nagy
author_sort Gilligan, Christopher
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. The role of restorative neurostimulation in the treatment of patients with refractory mechanical CLBP and multifidus muscle dysfunction has been established in one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and several clinical studies that demonstrated both safety and clinical benefit. This post-market trial provides a direct comparison to optimized medical management to test the hypothesis that the addition of restorative neurostimulation to current care paradigms results in significant improvements in back pain-related disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial will include people who have reported significant levels of back pain and back pain-related disability with symptoms that have persisted for longer than 6 months prior to enrollment and resulted in pain on most days in the 12 months prior to enrollment. Eligible patients will be randomized to either optimal medical management or optimal medical management plus ReActiv8® restorative neurostimulation therapy. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at regular intervals out to the 1-year primary endpoint, at which time the patients in the control arm will be offered implantation with the ReActiv8 system. Assessment of each group will continue for an additional year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RESTORE trial follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The WCG IRB acts as the Central Institutional Review Board (IRB) for most sites and some sites will receive local IRB approval prior to enrollment of patients. Each IRB assessed the protocol and related documentation. The protocol complies with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). All patients provide written informed consent to participate in the trial. Protocol Version. Version C, 07 Sep 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number. NCT04803214 registered March 17, 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100366952023-03-25 ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol) Gilligan, Christopher Burnside, Diane Grant, Lisa Yong, R. Jason Mullins, Peter M. Schwab, Frank Mekhail, Nagy Pain Ther Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. The role of restorative neurostimulation in the treatment of patients with refractory mechanical CLBP and multifidus muscle dysfunction has been established in one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and several clinical studies that demonstrated both safety and clinical benefit. This post-market trial provides a direct comparison to optimized medical management to test the hypothesis that the addition of restorative neurostimulation to current care paradigms results in significant improvements in back pain-related disability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial will include people who have reported significant levels of back pain and back pain-related disability with symptoms that have persisted for longer than 6 months prior to enrollment and resulted in pain on most days in the 12 months prior to enrollment. Eligible patients will be randomized to either optimal medical management or optimal medical management plus ReActiv8® restorative neurostimulation therapy. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at regular intervals out to the 1-year primary endpoint, at which time the patients in the control arm will be offered implantation with the ReActiv8 system. Assessment of each group will continue for an additional year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RESTORE trial follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The WCG IRB acts as the Central Institutional Review Board (IRB) for most sites and some sites will receive local IRB approval prior to enrollment of patients. Each IRB assessed the protocol and related documentation. The protocol complies with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). All patients provide written informed consent to participate in the trial. Protocol Version. Version C, 07 Sep 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number. NCT04803214 registered March 17, 2021. Springer Healthcare 2023-02-14 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10036695/ /pubmed/36787013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gilligan, Christopher
Burnside, Diane
Grant, Lisa
Yong, R. Jason
Mullins, Peter M.
Schwab, Frank
Mekhail, Nagy
ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title_full ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title_fullStr ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title_full_unstemmed ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title_short ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol)
title_sort reactiv8 stimulation therapy vs. optimal medical management: a randomized controlled trial for the treatment of intractable mechanical chronic low back pain (restore trial protocol)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gilliganchristopher reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT burnsidediane reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT grantlisa reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT yongrjason reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT mullinspeterm reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT schwabfrank reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol
AT mekhailnagy reactiv8stimulationtherapyvsoptimalmedicalmanagementarandomizedcontrolledtrialforthetreatmentofintractablemechanicalchroniclowbackpainrestoretrialprotocol