Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain

PURPOSE: We compared the clinical effects of Neurotropin, limaprost alfadex, and a combination of both drugs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial from March 2021 to May 2022. Participants were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eguchi, Yawara, Aoki, Yasuchika, Yamashita, Masaomi, Fujimoto, Kazuki, Sato, Takashi, Abe, Koki, Sato, Masashi, Yamanaka, Hajime, Toyoguchi, Toru, Shimizu, Keisuke, Orita, Sumihisa, Inage, Kazuhide, Shiga, Yasuhiro, Ohtori, Seiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z
_version_ 1784911717548949504
author Eguchi, Yawara
Aoki, Yasuchika
Yamashita, Masaomi
Fujimoto, Kazuki
Sato, Takashi
Abe, Koki
Sato, Masashi
Yamanaka, Hajime
Toyoguchi, Toru
Shimizu, Keisuke
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Ohtori, Seiji
author_facet Eguchi, Yawara
Aoki, Yasuchika
Yamashita, Masaomi
Fujimoto, Kazuki
Sato, Takashi
Abe, Koki
Sato, Masashi
Yamanaka, Hajime
Toyoguchi, Toru
Shimizu, Keisuke
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Ohtori, Seiji
author_sort Eguchi, Yawara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We compared the clinical effects of Neurotropin, limaprost alfadex, and a combination of both drugs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial from March 2021 to May 2022. Participants were patients diagnosed with LSS by MRI and were randomly assigned to three groups: Neurotropin/limaprost combination (NL group), Neurotropin (N group), and limaprost group (L group). Participants received the drugs administered orally for 12 weeks, and each examination and observation was performed before any drug administration and every 2 weeks thereafter. We recorded age, sex, height, weight, duration of symptoms, intermittent claudication distance, level of stenosis in MRI, and concomitant analgesics as examination items in the trial period. Items measured during the trial were visual analog scale (VAS) score (mm) for LBP, leg pain and numbness, walking activity (walking speed, stride length), standing balance (3 m Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test results, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) results), LBP/Quality of Life (QOL)-related scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro QOL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)), psychological factors (Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) scores), and adverse events. Each item was evaluated using changes at each visit (weeks 2–12) from baseline value before drug administration (week 0), and changes were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: We included results from 64 patients in the present study; 24 were assigned to the NL group (mean age 71.2 years), 20 to the N group (mean age 76.2 years), and 20 to the L group (mean age 74.4 years). There were no significant differences between the three groups in patient characteristics, concomitant analgesics, or baseline VAS score, gait balance, or QOL-related scores (p ≥ 0.05). The VAS and leg pain scores were significantly improved in Group L, and LBP was improved significantly in Group N. QOL and ODI scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups, EQ-5D score improved significantly in the L group, and RDQ score improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Psychological factor and PCS scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups (p < 0.05). Walking speed and stride length were improved significantly in the NL and N groups (p < 0.05). TUG/FTSST scores were improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Leg pain VAS score was improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the L group compared with the NL group after 6 and 12 weeks of administration, and LBP VAS was improved significantly in the N group after 6 weeks compared with the NL group (p < 0.05). Walking speed was significantly improved in the NL group after 2 weeks compared with the N group and improved significantly in the NL group after 6 weeks (p < 0.05) compared with the L group. RDQ was decreased significantly in the L group compared with the NL group after 8 weeks (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of Neurotropin and limaprost showed an additional effect on walking speed compared with single drug administration. Neurotropin may contribute to the improvement of low back pain, walking speed/stride length, and standing balance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200282).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100367102023-03-25 Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain Eguchi, Yawara Aoki, Yasuchika Yamashita, Masaomi Fujimoto, Kazuki Sato, Takashi Abe, Koki Sato, Masashi Yamanaka, Hajime Toyoguchi, Toru Shimizu, Keisuke Orita, Sumihisa Inage, Kazuhide Shiga, Yasuhiro Ohtori, Seiji Pain Ther Original Research PURPOSE: We compared the clinical effects of Neurotropin, limaprost alfadex, and a combination of both drugs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial from March 2021 to May 2022. Participants were patients diagnosed with LSS by MRI and were randomly assigned to three groups: Neurotropin/limaprost combination (NL group), Neurotropin (N group), and limaprost group (L group). Participants received the drugs administered orally for 12 weeks, and each examination and observation was performed before any drug administration and every 2 weeks thereafter. We recorded age, sex, height, weight, duration of symptoms, intermittent claudication distance, level of stenosis in MRI, and concomitant analgesics as examination items in the trial period. Items measured during the trial were visual analog scale (VAS) score (mm) for LBP, leg pain and numbness, walking activity (walking speed, stride length), standing balance (3 m Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test results, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) results), LBP/Quality of Life (QOL)-related scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro QOL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)), psychological factors (Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) scores), and adverse events. Each item was evaluated using changes at each visit (weeks 2–12) from baseline value before drug administration (week 0), and changes were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: We included results from 64 patients in the present study; 24 were assigned to the NL group (mean age 71.2 years), 20 to the N group (mean age 76.2 years), and 20 to the L group (mean age 74.4 years). There were no significant differences between the three groups in patient characteristics, concomitant analgesics, or baseline VAS score, gait balance, or QOL-related scores (p ≥ 0.05). The VAS and leg pain scores were significantly improved in Group L, and LBP was improved significantly in Group N. QOL and ODI scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups, EQ-5D score improved significantly in the L group, and RDQ score improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Psychological factor and PCS scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups (p < 0.05). Walking speed and stride length were improved significantly in the NL and N groups (p < 0.05). TUG/FTSST scores were improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Leg pain VAS score was improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the L group compared with the NL group after 6 and 12 weeks of administration, and LBP VAS was improved significantly in the N group after 6 weeks compared with the NL group (p < 0.05). Walking speed was significantly improved in the NL group after 2 weeks compared with the N group and improved significantly in the NL group after 6 weeks (p < 0.05) compared with the L group. RDQ was decreased significantly in the L group compared with the NL group after 8 weeks (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of Neurotropin and limaprost showed an additional effect on walking speed compared with single drug administration. Neurotropin may contribute to the improvement of low back pain, walking speed/stride length, and standing balance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200282). Springer Healthcare 2023-01-16 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10036710/ /pubmed/36645650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Eguchi, Yawara
Aoki, Yasuchika
Yamashita, Masaomi
Fujimoto, Kazuki
Sato, Takashi
Abe, Koki
Sato, Masashi
Yamanaka, Hajime
Toyoguchi, Toru
Shimizu, Keisuke
Orita, Sumihisa
Inage, Kazuhide
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Ohtori, Seiji
Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain
title_sort clinical efficacy of neurotropin for lumbar spinal stenosis with low back pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z
work_keys_str_mv AT eguchiyawara clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT aokiyasuchika clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT yamashitamasaomi clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT fujimotokazuki clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT satotakashi clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT abekoki clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT satomasashi clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT yamanakahajime clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT toyoguchitoru clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT shimizukeisuke clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT oritasumihisa clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT inagekazuhide clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT shigayasuhiro clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain
AT ohtoriseiji clinicalefficacyofneurotropinforlumbarspinalstenosiswithlowbackpain