Cargando…

The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK

In recent years, resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) and tetrahydropyrimidine (PYR) anthelmintics in global cyathostomin populations, has led to reliance on the macrocyclic lactone drugs (ML-of which ivermectin and moxidectin are licensed in horses) to control these parasites. Recently, the first c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bull, K.E., Allen, K.J., Hodgkinson, J.E., Peachey, L.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36940551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.03.001
_version_ 1784911759138619392
author Bull, K.E.
Allen, K.J.
Hodgkinson, J.E.
Peachey, L.E.
author_facet Bull, K.E.
Allen, K.J.
Hodgkinson, J.E.
Peachey, L.E.
author_sort Bull, K.E.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) and tetrahydropyrimidine (PYR) anthelmintics in global cyathostomin populations, has led to reliance on the macrocyclic lactone drugs (ML-of which ivermectin and moxidectin are licensed in horses) to control these parasites. Recently, the first confirmed case of resistance to both ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX) was reported in the USA in yearlings imported from Ireland. This suggests that ML resistance in cyathostomins has emerged, and raises the possibility that regular movement of horses may result in rapid spread of ML resistant cyathostomins. Resistance may go undetected due to a lack of surveillance for ML efficacy. Here, we report anthelmintic efficacies in cyathostomins infecting UK Thoroughbreds on four studs. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed to define resistance (resistance = FECR <95% lower credible interval (LCI) < 90%). Stud A yearlings had FECRs of 36.4–78.6% (CI:15.7–86.3) after three IVM treatments, 72.6% (CI: 50.8–85.2) after MOX, and 80.8% (CI: 61.9–90.0) after PYR. Mares on stud A had a FECR of 97.8% (CI: 93.3–99.9) and 98% (95.1–99.4) after IVM and MOX treatment, respectively. Resistance to MLs was not found in yearlings or mares on studs B, C or D with FECR after MOX OR IVM treatment ranging from 99.8 to 99.9% (95.4–100); although yearlings on studs B, C and D all had an egg reappearance period (ERP) of six weeks for MOX and stud C had a four-week ERP for IVM. This study describes the first confirmed case of resistance to both licensed ML drugs on a UK Thoroughbred stud and highlights the urgent need for a) increased awareness of the threat of ML resistant parasites infecting horses, and b) extensive surveillance of ML efficacy against cyathostomin populations in the UK, to gauge the extent of the problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100368902023-03-25 The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK Bull, K.E. Allen, K.J. Hodgkinson, J.E. Peachey, L.E. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist Regular article In recent years, resistance to the benzimidazole (BZ) and tetrahydropyrimidine (PYR) anthelmintics in global cyathostomin populations, has led to reliance on the macrocyclic lactone drugs (ML-of which ivermectin and moxidectin are licensed in horses) to control these parasites. Recently, the first confirmed case of resistance to both ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX) was reported in the USA in yearlings imported from Ireland. This suggests that ML resistance in cyathostomins has emerged, and raises the possibility that regular movement of horses may result in rapid spread of ML resistant cyathostomins. Resistance may go undetected due to a lack of surveillance for ML efficacy. Here, we report anthelmintic efficacies in cyathostomins infecting UK Thoroughbreds on four studs. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were performed to define resistance (resistance = FECR <95% lower credible interval (LCI) < 90%). Stud A yearlings had FECRs of 36.4–78.6% (CI:15.7–86.3) after three IVM treatments, 72.6% (CI: 50.8–85.2) after MOX, and 80.8% (CI: 61.9–90.0) after PYR. Mares on stud A had a FECR of 97.8% (CI: 93.3–99.9) and 98% (95.1–99.4) after IVM and MOX treatment, respectively. Resistance to MLs was not found in yearlings or mares on studs B, C or D with FECR after MOX OR IVM treatment ranging from 99.8 to 99.9% (95.4–100); although yearlings on studs B, C and D all had an egg reappearance period (ERP) of six weeks for MOX and stud C had a four-week ERP for IVM. This study describes the first confirmed case of resistance to both licensed ML drugs on a UK Thoroughbred stud and highlights the urgent need for a) increased awareness of the threat of ML resistant parasites infecting horses, and b) extensive surveillance of ML efficacy against cyathostomin populations in the UK, to gauge the extent of the problem. Elsevier 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10036890/ /pubmed/36940551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.03.001 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular article
Bull, K.E.
Allen, K.J.
Hodgkinson, J.E.
Peachey, L.E.
The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title_full The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title_fullStr The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title_full_unstemmed The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title_short The first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the UK
title_sort first report of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins in the uk
topic Regular article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36940551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT bullke thefirstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT allenkj thefirstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT hodgkinsonje thefirstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT peacheyle thefirstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT bullke firstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT allenkj firstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT hodgkinsonje firstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk
AT peacheyle firstreportofmacrocycliclactoneresistantcyathostominsintheuk