Cargando…

Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography

PURPOSE: To report the detection rate of colorectal tumors with computed tomography (CT) performed within 1 year before diagnosis for indications other than colon abnormalities. Strategies to improve cancer detection are reported. METHODS: Two board-certified, subspecialty-trained abdominal radiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, C. Daniel, Flicek, Kristina T., Mead-Harvey, Carolyn, Quillen, Jaxon K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36961532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03884-3
_version_ 1784911779751526400
author Johnson, C. Daniel
Flicek, Kristina T.
Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
Quillen, Jaxon K.
author_facet Johnson, C. Daniel
Flicek, Kristina T.
Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
Quillen, Jaxon K.
author_sort Johnson, C. Daniel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the detection rate of colorectal tumors with computed tomography (CT) performed within 1 year before diagnosis for indications other than colon abnormalities. Strategies to improve cancer detection are reported. METHODS: Two board-certified, subspecialty-trained abdominal radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient health records and CT images with knowledge of tumor location/size. Patients were classified into 3 groups: prospective (colon abnormality suggesting neoplasm documented in radiologic report), retrospective (not documented in radiologic report but detected in our retrospective review of CT images), and undetected (neither prospectively nor retrospectively detected). Retrospective detection confidence and morphologic characteristics of each tumor were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 209 included patients, 106 (50.7%) had prospectively detected tumors, 66 (31.6%) had retrospectively detected tumors, and 37 (17.7%) had undetected tumors. Asymmetric bowel wall thickening and polypoid masses were present more often in the retrospective group than in the prospective group (27% vs. 10.5% and 26% vs. 17.1%, respectively). Tumors in the ascending colon were more likely to be detected retrospectively than prospectively (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% CI 1.07–7.08; P = 0.04). Undetected tumors were smaller on average (2.9 cm) than prospective (6.0 cm) and retrospective (4.9 cm) tumors (P = 0.03). Detection confidence was lower for retrospectively detected tumors than for prospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Indications other than abdominal pain were most common for retrospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Use of intravenous contrast material was lowest in the undetected group (P = 0.003). The prospective group had more pericolonic abnormalities, regional/retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (P < 0.001), and distant metastases than did the retrospective group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Half of all colorectal tumors were not detected prospectively. Radiologists should perform meticulous colon tracking regardless of the indication for CT. The right colon merits additional examination. Polypoid and asymmetric morphologic characteristics were most often overlooked, but these characteristics can be learned to improve detection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10036972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100369722023-03-24 Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography Johnson, C. Daniel Flicek, Kristina T. Mead-Harvey, Carolyn Quillen, Jaxon K. Abdom Radiol (NY) Technical PURPOSE: To report the detection rate of colorectal tumors with computed tomography (CT) performed within 1 year before diagnosis for indications other than colon abnormalities. Strategies to improve cancer detection are reported. METHODS: Two board-certified, subspecialty-trained abdominal radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient health records and CT images with knowledge of tumor location/size. Patients were classified into 3 groups: prospective (colon abnormality suggesting neoplasm documented in radiologic report), retrospective (not documented in radiologic report but detected in our retrospective review of CT images), and undetected (neither prospectively nor retrospectively detected). Retrospective detection confidence and morphologic characteristics of each tumor were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 209 included patients, 106 (50.7%) had prospectively detected tumors, 66 (31.6%) had retrospectively detected tumors, and 37 (17.7%) had undetected tumors. Asymmetric bowel wall thickening and polypoid masses were present more often in the retrospective group than in the prospective group (27% vs. 10.5% and 26% vs. 17.1%, respectively). Tumors in the ascending colon were more likely to be detected retrospectively than prospectively (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% CI 1.07–7.08; P = 0.04). Undetected tumors were smaller on average (2.9 cm) than prospective (6.0 cm) and retrospective (4.9 cm) tumors (P = 0.03). Detection confidence was lower for retrospectively detected tumors than for prospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Indications other than abdominal pain were most common for retrospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Use of intravenous contrast material was lowest in the undetected group (P = 0.003). The prospective group had more pericolonic abnormalities, regional/retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (P < 0.001), and distant metastases than did the retrospective group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Half of all colorectal tumors were not detected prospectively. Radiologists should perform meticulous colon tracking regardless of the indication for CT. The right colon merits additional examination. Polypoid and asymmetric morphologic characteristics were most often overlooked, but these characteristics can be learned to improve detection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-03-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10036972/ /pubmed/36961532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03884-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Technical
Johnson, C. Daniel
Flicek, Kristina T.
Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
Quillen, Jaxon K.
Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title_full Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title_fullStr Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title_short Strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
title_sort strategies for improving colorectal cancer detection with routine computed tomography
topic Technical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10036972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36961532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03884-3
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsoncdaniel strategiesforimprovingcolorectalcancerdetectionwithroutinecomputedtomography
AT flicekkristinat strategiesforimprovingcolorectalcancerdetectionwithroutinecomputedtomography
AT meadharveycarolyn strategiesforimprovingcolorectalcancerdetectionwithroutinecomputedtomography
AT quillenjaxonk strategiesforimprovingcolorectalcancerdetectionwithroutinecomputedtomography