Cargando…
Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test
INTRODUCTION: Visual acuity (VA) testing is a critical screening examination for the assessment of visual function. This study describes the development and validation of a smartphone-based VA test: the K-VA test. METHODS: A total of 171 patients with various ocular diseases were examined in our out...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36961662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00697-x |
_version_ | 1784911871746244608 |
---|---|
author | Karampatakis, Vasileios Almaliotis, Diamantis Talimtzi, Persefoni Almpanidou, Stavroula |
author_facet | Karampatakis, Vasileios Almaliotis, Diamantis Talimtzi, Persefoni Almpanidou, Stavroula |
author_sort | Karampatakis, Vasileios |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Visual acuity (VA) testing is a critical screening examination for the assessment of visual function. This study describes the development and validation of a smartphone-based VA test: the K-VA test. METHODS: A total of 171 patients with various ocular diseases were examined in our outpatient unit at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine in Greece. Participants underwent VA examination using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts and the K-VA smartphone-based test. The K-VA test was performed by participants themselves. The Bland–Altman method was employed to assess the agreement between the ETDRS charts and the new test for the examination of VA at 1 m and 40 cm. Test–retest reliability was also calculated. A questionnaire regarding the participants’ feedback on the K-VA test was completed. RESULTS: No significant bias was observed between the gold standard ETDRS charts and the K-VA test measurements. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement, LoA) between the K-VA test at 1 m and the ETDRS chart at 4 m was −0.006 (95% LoA −0.129 to 0.117) logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR). The agreement of the K-VA test at 40 cm with the near ETDRS chart was also high with a mean difference of −0.007 (95% LoA −0.105 to 0.090) logMAR. Test–retest reliability was found to be high with a mean difference of 0.003 (95% LoA −0.045 to 0.033) logMAR and 0.005 (95% LoA −0.065 to 0.076) logMAR for the K-VA test at 1 m and 40 cm, respectively. A total of 97 participants answered the questionnaire and 71 (73.2%) stated that the test was easy to very easy to use for self-performance. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the K-VA application performed well compared with the ETDRS charts and provides reliable and repeatable measurements of VA across a wide range of VA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-023-00697-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10037403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100374032023-03-24 Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test Karampatakis, Vasileios Almaliotis, Diamantis Talimtzi, Persefoni Almpanidou, Stavroula Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Visual acuity (VA) testing is a critical screening examination for the assessment of visual function. This study describes the development and validation of a smartphone-based VA test: the K-VA test. METHODS: A total of 171 patients with various ocular diseases were examined in our outpatient unit at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine in Greece. Participants underwent VA examination using the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts and the K-VA smartphone-based test. The K-VA test was performed by participants themselves. The Bland–Altman method was employed to assess the agreement between the ETDRS charts and the new test for the examination of VA at 1 m and 40 cm. Test–retest reliability was also calculated. A questionnaire regarding the participants’ feedback on the K-VA test was completed. RESULTS: No significant bias was observed between the gold standard ETDRS charts and the K-VA test measurements. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement, LoA) between the K-VA test at 1 m and the ETDRS chart at 4 m was −0.006 (95% LoA −0.129 to 0.117) logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR). The agreement of the K-VA test at 40 cm with the near ETDRS chart was also high with a mean difference of −0.007 (95% LoA −0.105 to 0.090) logMAR. Test–retest reliability was found to be high with a mean difference of 0.003 (95% LoA −0.045 to 0.033) logMAR and 0.005 (95% LoA −0.065 to 0.076) logMAR for the K-VA test at 1 m and 40 cm, respectively. A total of 97 participants answered the questionnaire and 71 (73.2%) stated that the test was easy to very easy to use for self-performance. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the K-VA application performed well compared with the ETDRS charts and provides reliable and repeatable measurements of VA across a wide range of VA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-023-00697-x. Springer Healthcare 2023-03-24 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10037403/ /pubmed/36961662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00697-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Karampatakis, Vasileios Almaliotis, Diamantis Talimtzi, Persefoni Almpanidou, Stavroula Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title | Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title_full | Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title_fullStr | Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title_short | Design and Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test: The K-VA Test |
title_sort | design and validation of a novel smartphone-based visual acuity test: the k-va test |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36961662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00697-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karampatakisvasileios designandvalidationofanovelsmartphonebasedvisualacuitytestthekvatest AT almaliotisdiamantis designandvalidationofanovelsmartphonebasedvisualacuitytestthekvatest AT talimtzipersefoni designandvalidationofanovelsmartphonebasedvisualacuitytestthekvatest AT almpanidoustavroula designandvalidationofanovelsmartphonebasedvisualacuitytestthekvatest |