Cargando…
Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038 |
_version_ | 1784911914424336384 |
---|---|
author | Slot, Stefanie Lavini, Cristina Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C. Boden, Bouke J. H. Marcus, J. Tim Huisman, Marc C. Yaqub, Maqsood Barbé, Ellis Wondergem, Mariëlle J. Zijlstra, Josée M. Zweegman, Sonja Raijmakers, Pieter G. |
author_facet | Slot, Stefanie Lavini, Cristina Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C. Boden, Bouke J. H. Marcus, J. Tim Huisman, Marc C. Yaqub, Maqsood Barbé, Ellis Wondergem, Mariëlle J. Zijlstra, Josée M. Zweegman, Sonja Raijmakers, Pieter G. |
author_sort | Slot, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([(15)O]water, [(18)F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [(15)O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [(18)F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [(15)O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [(18)F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10037592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100375922023-03-25 Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study Slot, Stefanie Lavini, Cristina Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C. Boden, Bouke J. H. Marcus, J. Tim Huisman, Marc C. Yaqub, Maqsood Barbé, Ellis Wondergem, Mariëlle J. Zijlstra, Josée M. Zweegman, Sonja Raijmakers, Pieter G. Tomography Article Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([(15)O]water, [(18)F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [(15)O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [(18)F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [(15)O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [(18)F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10037592/ /pubmed/36960997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Slot, Stefanie Lavini, Cristina Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C. Boden, Bouke J. H. Marcus, J. Tim Huisman, Marc C. Yaqub, Maqsood Barbé, Ellis Wondergem, Mariëlle J. Zijlstra, Josée M. Zweegman, Sonja Raijmakers, Pieter G. Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title | Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | characterizing the bone marrow environment in advanced-stage myelofibrosis during ruxolitinib treatment using pet/ct and mri: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slotstefanie characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT lavinicristina characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT zwezerijnengerbenjc characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT bodenboukejh characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT marcusjtim characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT huismanmarcc characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT yaqubmaqsood characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT barbeellis characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT wondergemmariellej characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT zijlstrajoseem characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT zweegmansonja characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy AT raijmakerspieterg characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy |