Cargando…

Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study

Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slot, Stefanie, Lavini, Cristina, Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C., Boden, Bouke J. H., Marcus, J. Tim, Huisman, Marc C., Yaqub, Maqsood, Barbé, Ellis, Wondergem, Mariëlle J., Zijlstra, Josée M., Zweegman, Sonja, Raijmakers, Pieter G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038
_version_ 1784911914424336384
author Slot, Stefanie
Lavini, Cristina
Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C.
Boden, Bouke J. H.
Marcus, J. Tim
Huisman, Marc C.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Barbé, Ellis
Wondergem, Mariëlle J.
Zijlstra, Josée M.
Zweegman, Sonja
Raijmakers, Pieter G.
author_facet Slot, Stefanie
Lavini, Cristina
Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C.
Boden, Bouke J. H.
Marcus, J. Tim
Huisman, Marc C.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Barbé, Ellis
Wondergem, Mariëlle J.
Zijlstra, Josée M.
Zweegman, Sonja
Raijmakers, Pieter G.
author_sort Slot, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([(15)O]water, [(18)F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [(15)O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [(18)F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [(15)O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [(18)F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10037592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100375922023-03-25 Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study Slot, Stefanie Lavini, Cristina Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C. Boden, Bouke J. H. Marcus, J. Tim Huisman, Marc C. Yaqub, Maqsood Barbé, Ellis Wondergem, Mariëlle J. Zijlstra, Josée M. Zweegman, Sonja Raijmakers, Pieter G. Tomography Article Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([(15)O]water, [(18)F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [(15)O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [(18)F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [(15)O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [(18)F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10037592/ /pubmed/36960997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Slot, Stefanie
Lavini, Cristina
Zwezerijnen, Gerben J. C.
Boden, Bouke J. H.
Marcus, J. Tim
Huisman, Marc C.
Yaqub, Maqsood
Barbé, Ellis
Wondergem, Mariëlle J.
Zijlstra, Josée M.
Zweegman, Sonja
Raijmakers, Pieter G.
Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title_full Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title_short Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study
title_sort characterizing the bone marrow environment in advanced-stage myelofibrosis during ruxolitinib treatment using pet/ct and mri: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020038
work_keys_str_mv AT slotstefanie characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT lavinicristina characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT zwezerijnengerbenjc characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT bodenboukejh characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT marcusjtim characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT huismanmarcc characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT yaqubmaqsood characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT barbeellis characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT wondergemmariellej characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT zijlstrajoseem characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT zweegmansonja characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy
AT raijmakerspieterg characterizingthebonemarrowenvironmentinadvancedstagemyelofibrosisduringruxolitinibtreatmentusingpetctandmriapilotstudy