Cargando…

Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND: The appearance of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation (SERa) is one of the most common dysmorphic phenotypes of oocytes, however, the impact of SERa occurrence on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SERa in oocytes on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Meng, Gao, Limin, Yang, Qiyu, Long, Rui, Zhang, Yini, Jin, Lei, Zhu, Lixia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01135-z
_version_ 1784911947610718208
author Wang, Meng
Gao, Limin
Yang, Qiyu
Long, Rui
Zhang, Yini
Jin, Lei
Zhu, Lixia
author_facet Wang, Meng
Gao, Limin
Yang, Qiyu
Long, Rui
Zhang, Yini
Jin, Lei
Zhu, Lixia
author_sort Wang, Meng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The appearance of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation (SERa) is one of the most common dysmorphic phenotypes of oocytes, however, the impact of SERa occurrence on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SERa in oocytes on the aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos in IVF. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 114 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with the appearance of SERa undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were enrolled, and among them there were 323 SERa(+) oocytes and 1253 sibling unaffected oocytes. The 907 PGT-A cycles without SERa during the same period were enrolled as controls. A propensity score matching of 1:1 ratio between these two groups resulted in 113 matched cycles. The outcome parameters between the SERa(+) cycles/oocytes and the controls were compared. IVF laboratory outcomes, PGT-A outcomes, and clinical and neonatal outcomes were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Increased abnormal fertilization rate and reduced blastocyst formation rate can be observed in both SERa(+) cycles and oocytes, some other parameters on developmental potential, such as available embryo rate at Day 3 and available blastocyst rate, were also impaired in the case of SERa occurrences. Among the 910 blastocysts for PGT-A, the percentage of euploid embryos was similar between the matched cohorts, while an unpredicted increase of the proportions of euploid in the SERa(+) oocytes, compared to the SERa(-) oocytes. Moreover, there was no significance in terms of clinical and neonatal outcomes, such as implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate, regardless of the presence of SERa in cycles and oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of SERa within mature oocytes has no significant impact on the aneuploidy of subsequent blastocysts. It is recommended to utilize these oocytes, especially for those with few oocytes or advanced maternal age, which is likely to increase the cumulative pregnancy rate. This study may offer evidence to assist embryologists to make clinical decisions concerning SERa(+) oocytes more consciously and rationally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-023-01135-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10037775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100377752023-03-25 Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study Wang, Meng Gao, Limin Yang, Qiyu Long, Rui Zhang, Yini Jin, Lei Zhu, Lixia J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: The appearance of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation (SERa) is one of the most common dysmorphic phenotypes of oocytes, however, the impact of SERa occurrence on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SERa in oocytes on the aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos in IVF. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 114 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with the appearance of SERa undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were enrolled, and among them there were 323 SERa(+) oocytes and 1253 sibling unaffected oocytes. The 907 PGT-A cycles without SERa during the same period were enrolled as controls. A propensity score matching of 1:1 ratio between these two groups resulted in 113 matched cycles. The outcome parameters between the SERa(+) cycles/oocytes and the controls were compared. IVF laboratory outcomes, PGT-A outcomes, and clinical and neonatal outcomes were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Increased abnormal fertilization rate and reduced blastocyst formation rate can be observed in both SERa(+) cycles and oocytes, some other parameters on developmental potential, such as available embryo rate at Day 3 and available blastocyst rate, were also impaired in the case of SERa occurrences. Among the 910 blastocysts for PGT-A, the percentage of euploid embryos was similar between the matched cohorts, while an unpredicted increase of the proportions of euploid in the SERa(+) oocytes, compared to the SERa(-) oocytes. Moreover, there was no significance in terms of clinical and neonatal outcomes, such as implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate, regardless of the presence of SERa in cycles and oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of SERa within mature oocytes has no significant impact on the aneuploidy of subsequent blastocysts. It is recommended to utilize these oocytes, especially for those with few oocytes or advanced maternal age, which is likely to increase the cumulative pregnancy rate. This study may offer evidence to assist embryologists to make clinical decisions concerning SERa(+) oocytes more consciously and rationally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-023-01135-z. BioMed Central 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10037775/ /pubmed/36959673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01135-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Meng
Gao, Limin
Yang, Qiyu
Long, Rui
Zhang, Yini
Jin, Lei
Zhu, Lixia
Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title_full Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title_fullStr Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title_full_unstemmed Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title_short Does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? A propensity score matching study
title_sort does smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation in oocytes impact the chromosome aneuploidy of the subsequent embryos? a propensity score matching study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10037775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36959673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01135-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmeng doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT gaolimin doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yangqiyu doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT longrui doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangyini doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT jinlei doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhulixia doessmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregationinoocytesimpactthechromosomeaneuploidyofthesubsequentembryosapropensityscorematchingstudy