Cargando…

Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021

Genetically modified organisms or GMOs offer significant advantages in food production, including increased yield, decreased pesticide usage, and better disease resistance. However, adoption and public sentiment toward GMOs is highly variable. Without positive sentiment toward GMOs, consumption of G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohi, Manreet, Pitesky, Maurice, Gendreau, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10038016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294
_version_ 1784911995924905984
author Sohi, Manreet
Pitesky, Maurice
Gendreau, Joseph
author_facet Sohi, Manreet
Pitesky, Maurice
Gendreau, Joseph
author_sort Sohi, Manreet
collection PubMed
description Genetically modified organisms or GMOs offer significant advantages in food production, including increased yield, decreased pesticide usage, and better disease resistance. However, adoption and public sentiment toward GMOs is highly variable. Without positive sentiment toward GMOs, consumption of GMO-based foods may not have an adequate market for further investment. In order to better understand overall public sentiment toward GMO-based foods, a Boolean search was created using a commercial web-crawling service to collect and analyze public sentiment of GMOs across multiple social media and web-based services from May 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. The Boolean query identified 2 million mentions of GMOs during the study period. Using the commercial software’s sentiment analysis (i.e. classifying mentions as either neutral, negative, or positive), 54% of the mentions were categorized as having a neutral sentiment, 32% as having a negative sentiment, and 14% as having a positive sentiment. Further emotional analysis (classifying posts by the emotion expressed, e.g., disgust, joy, sadness, anger, fear, surprise) produced by the software shows that the majority of the mentions were categorized as expressing a negative emotion: 31% of mentions expressed disgust, 28% joy, 18% sadness, 16% anger, 7% fear, and 1% surprise. Among the various social media sources collected, Twitter was the main source of data, providing 62% of the total 2 million mentions, followed by 14% from news sources and 12% from Reddit. These types of data can be used to better understand trends in sentiment toward GMOs and ultimately play an important role in combating mis-information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10038016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100380162023-03-25 Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021 Sohi, Manreet Pitesky, Maurice Gendreau, Joseph GM Crops Food Research Article Genetically modified organisms or GMOs offer significant advantages in food production, including increased yield, decreased pesticide usage, and better disease resistance. However, adoption and public sentiment toward GMOs is highly variable. Without positive sentiment toward GMOs, consumption of GMO-based foods may not have an adequate market for further investment. In order to better understand overall public sentiment toward GMO-based foods, a Boolean search was created using a commercial web-crawling service to collect and analyze public sentiment of GMOs across multiple social media and web-based services from May 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. The Boolean query identified 2 million mentions of GMOs during the study period. Using the commercial software’s sentiment analysis (i.e. classifying mentions as either neutral, negative, or positive), 54% of the mentions were categorized as having a neutral sentiment, 32% as having a negative sentiment, and 14% as having a positive sentiment. Further emotional analysis (classifying posts by the emotion expressed, e.g., disgust, joy, sadness, anger, fear, surprise) produced by the software shows that the majority of the mentions were categorized as expressing a negative emotion: 31% of mentions expressed disgust, 28% joy, 18% sadness, 16% anger, 7% fear, and 1% surprise. Among the various social media sources collected, Twitter was the main source of data, providing 62% of the total 2 million mentions, followed by 14% from news sources and 12% from Reddit. These types of data can be used to better understand trends in sentiment toward GMOs and ultimately play an important role in combating mis-information. Taylor & Francis 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10038016/ /pubmed/36947744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sohi, Manreet
Pitesky, Maurice
Gendreau, Joseph
Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title_full Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title_fullStr Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title_short Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021
title_sort analyzing public sentiment toward gmos via social media between 2019-2021
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10038016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294
work_keys_str_mv AT sohimanreet analyzingpublicsentimenttowardgmosviasocialmediabetween20192021
AT piteskymaurice analyzingpublicsentimenttowardgmosviasocialmediabetween20192021
AT gendreaujoseph analyzingpublicsentimenttowardgmosviasocialmediabetween20192021