Cargando…

Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND: Spinal stenosis is a neurological disorder related to the compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots, and its incidence increases yearly. We aimed to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between several modifiable risk factors and the risk of spinal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan, Bangbei, Ma, Ning, Lu, Weiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10038083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967997
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15087
_version_ 1784912011319050240
author Wan, Bangbei
Ma, Ning
Lu, Weiying
author_facet Wan, Bangbei
Ma, Ning
Lu, Weiying
author_sort Wan, Bangbei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal stenosis is a neurological disorder related to the compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots, and its incidence increases yearly. We aimed to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between several modifiable risk factors and the risk of spinal stenosis. METHODS: We obtained genome-wide association study summary data of large-sample projects (more than 100,000 individuals) from public databases. The data were associated with traits, including years of schooling (educational attainment) from the IEU OpenGWAS Project, smoking behavior (never vs. initiation) from the IEU OpenGWAS Project, body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank, length of mobile phone use from the UK Biobank, time spent watching television (TV) from the UK Biobank, and spinal stenosis from FinnGen biobank. Spinal stenosis was used as the outcome, whereas the other four traits were used as exposures. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) regressions were used as a primary to estimate the causal-effect size. Several sensitive analyses (including consistency, heterogenicity, and pleiotropy analyses) were conducted to test the stability and reliability of causal estimates. RESULTS: Univariable MR analyses showed that genetically predicted higher educational attainment (IVW; odds ratio (OR) = 0.606; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.507–0.724; P = 3.37 × 10(−8)) and never smoking (IVW; OR = 1.388; 95% CI [1.135–1.697]; P = 0.001) were negatively correlated with the risk of spinal stenosis. Meanwhile, a higher BMI (IVW; OR = 1.569; 95% CI [1.403–1.754]; P = 2.35 × 10(−8)), longer time spent using a mobile phone (IVW; OR = 1.895; 95% CI [1.306–2.750]; P = 0.001), and watching TV (IVW; OR = 1.776; 95% CI [1.245–2.532]; P = 0.002) were positively associated with the risk of spinal stenosis. Multivariable MR analysis indicated that educational attainment (IVW; OR = 0.670; 95% CI [0.465–0.967]; P = 0.032) and BMI (IVW; OR = 1.365; 95% CI [1.179–1.580]; P = 3.12 × 10(−5)) were independently causally related to the risk of spinal stenosis. CONCLUSION: Our findings supported the potential causal associations of the five factors (educational attainment, smoking behavior, BMI, length of mobile phone use, and watching TV) with the risk for spinal stenosis. While replication studies are essential, these findings may provide a new perspective on prevention and intervention strategies directed toward spinal stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10038083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100380832023-03-25 Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis Wan, Bangbei Ma, Ning Lu, Weiying PeerJ Bioinformatics BACKGROUND: Spinal stenosis is a neurological disorder related to the compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots, and its incidence increases yearly. We aimed to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between several modifiable risk factors and the risk of spinal stenosis. METHODS: We obtained genome-wide association study summary data of large-sample projects (more than 100,000 individuals) from public databases. The data were associated with traits, including years of schooling (educational attainment) from the IEU OpenGWAS Project, smoking behavior (never vs. initiation) from the IEU OpenGWAS Project, body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank, length of mobile phone use from the UK Biobank, time spent watching television (TV) from the UK Biobank, and spinal stenosis from FinnGen biobank. Spinal stenosis was used as the outcome, whereas the other four traits were used as exposures. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) regressions were used as a primary to estimate the causal-effect size. Several sensitive analyses (including consistency, heterogenicity, and pleiotropy analyses) were conducted to test the stability and reliability of causal estimates. RESULTS: Univariable MR analyses showed that genetically predicted higher educational attainment (IVW; odds ratio (OR) = 0.606; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.507–0.724; P = 3.37 × 10(−8)) and never smoking (IVW; OR = 1.388; 95% CI [1.135–1.697]; P = 0.001) were negatively correlated with the risk of spinal stenosis. Meanwhile, a higher BMI (IVW; OR = 1.569; 95% CI [1.403–1.754]; P = 2.35 × 10(−8)), longer time spent using a mobile phone (IVW; OR = 1.895; 95% CI [1.306–2.750]; P = 0.001), and watching TV (IVW; OR = 1.776; 95% CI [1.245–2.532]; P = 0.002) were positively associated with the risk of spinal stenosis. Multivariable MR analysis indicated that educational attainment (IVW; OR = 0.670; 95% CI [0.465–0.967]; P = 0.032) and BMI (IVW; OR = 1.365; 95% CI [1.179–1.580]; P = 3.12 × 10(−5)) were independently causally related to the risk of spinal stenosis. CONCLUSION: Our findings supported the potential causal associations of the five factors (educational attainment, smoking behavior, BMI, length of mobile phone use, and watching TV) with the risk for spinal stenosis. While replication studies are essential, these findings may provide a new perspective on prevention and intervention strategies directed toward spinal stenosis. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10038083/ /pubmed/36967997 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15087 Text en ©2023 Wan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioinformatics
Wan, Bangbei
Ma, Ning
Lu, Weiying
Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title_full Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title_short Evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
title_sort evaluating the causal relationship between five modifiable factors and the risk of spinal stenosis: a multivariable mendelian randomization analysis
topic Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10038083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967997
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15087
work_keys_str_mv AT wanbangbei evaluatingthecausalrelationshipbetweenfivemodifiablefactorsandtheriskofspinalstenosisamultivariablemendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT maning evaluatingthecausalrelationshipbetweenfivemodifiablefactorsandtheriskofspinalstenosisamultivariablemendelianrandomizationanalysis
AT luweiying evaluatingthecausalrelationshipbetweenfivemodifiablefactorsandtheriskofspinalstenosisamultivariablemendelianrandomizationanalysis