Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction chemotherapy (VRd), followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), are the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Pomalidomide is currently approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma. This sin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00816-8 |
_version_ | 1784912189329506304 |
---|---|
author | Saj, Fen Nisha, Yadav Ganesan, Prasanth Kayal, Smita Kar, Rakhee Halanaik, Dhanapathi Dubashi, Biswajit |
author_facet | Saj, Fen Nisha, Yadav Ganesan, Prasanth Kayal, Smita Kar, Rakhee Halanaik, Dhanapathi Dubashi, Biswajit |
author_sort | Saj, Fen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction chemotherapy (VRd), followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), are the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Pomalidomide is currently approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma. This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was the prospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (VPd) induction for NDMM. We used Fleming’s two-stage design for sample size calculation. We included transplant-eligible and ineligible patients aged 18–75 years in the study. The patients received four cycles of VPd induction followed by response assessment. Thirty-four patients were included in the study, of which 31 completed all four cycles of induction. The median age was 52 years (32–72). Thirty (91%) patients had multiple myeloma, and three had multiple plasmacytomas with less than 10% bone marrow involvement. Nine (27%) had ISS-I, 9 (27%) had ISS-II, and 15 (46%) had ISS-III myeloma. Three patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. After four cycles of VPd induction, ten patients (32%) achieved stringent CR, nine had CR (29%), eight (26%) had VGPR, and 4 (13%) had PR. Fifteen (48%) had a complete metabolic response (CMR) on PET-CT. Two patients developed SAEs. Anemia was the most common hematological toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were the most common non-hematological toxicities. Patients with ≥VGPR had significantly better 12-month PFS than those with PR. Patients with ≥VGPR and CMR on PET-CT had significantly better 12-month OS. Our study showed VPd induction is safe and efficacious in NDMM. Further Phase 3 studies are necessary to establish the superiority and survival benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100390092023-03-26 Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study Saj, Fen Nisha, Yadav Ganesan, Prasanth Kayal, Smita Kar, Rakhee Halanaik, Dhanapathi Dubashi, Biswajit Blood Cancer J Article Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction chemotherapy (VRd), followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), are the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Pomalidomide is currently approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma. This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was the prospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of bortezomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (VPd) induction for NDMM. We used Fleming’s two-stage design for sample size calculation. We included transplant-eligible and ineligible patients aged 18–75 years in the study. The patients received four cycles of VPd induction followed by response assessment. Thirty-four patients were included in the study, of which 31 completed all four cycles of induction. The median age was 52 years (32–72). Thirty (91%) patients had multiple myeloma, and three had multiple plasmacytomas with less than 10% bone marrow involvement. Nine (27%) had ISS-I, 9 (27%) had ISS-II, and 15 (46%) had ISS-III myeloma. Three patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. After four cycles of VPd induction, ten patients (32%) achieved stringent CR, nine had CR (29%), eight (26%) had VGPR, and 4 (13%) had PR. Fifteen (48%) had a complete metabolic response (CMR) on PET-CT. Two patients developed SAEs. Anemia was the most common hematological toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were the most common non-hematological toxicities. Patients with ≥VGPR had significantly better 12-month PFS than those with PR. Patients with ≥VGPR and CMR on PET-CT had significantly better 12-month OS. Our study showed VPd induction is safe and efficacious in NDMM. Further Phase 3 studies are necessary to establish the superiority and survival benefits. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10039009/ /pubmed/36964143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00816-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Saj, Fen Nisha, Yadav Ganesan, Prasanth Kayal, Smita Kar, Rakhee Halanaik, Dhanapathi Dubashi, Biswajit Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title | Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: pomace phase ii study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-023-00816-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sajfen efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT nishayadav efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT ganesanprasanth efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT kayalsmita efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT karrakhee efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT halanaikdhanapathi efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy AT dubashibiswajit efficacyandsafetyofpomalidomidebortezomibanddexamethasonecombinationchemotherapyfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomapomacephaseiistudy |