Cargando…
High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quali...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y |
_version_ | 1784912208317120512 |
---|---|
author | Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. Fink, Andreas Bauer, Jonathan F. Rominger, Christian Papousek, Ilona |
author_facet | Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. Fink, Andreas Bauer, Jonathan F. Rominger, Christian Papousek, Ilona |
author_sort | Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quality of reappraisal ideas were correlated with BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity (RST-Personality Questionnaire). Results revealed that high BIS and high FFFS reduced the total number of reappraisal ideas, indicating that combined heightened sensitivity of the two avoidance systems may deplete individuals’ repertoire of potential reappraisals. RST effects on the quality of generated reappraisals were also found. High BIS and low BAS lowered individuals’ propensity to produce positive re-interpretations, which are considered a more adaptive reappraisal tactic. High FFFS sensitivity was linked to a lower preference for problem-oriented reappraisals. This study underlines that certain interactions of motivational subsystems may be particularly detrimental for successful reappraisal of anger-eliciting events. Our findings reveal potential links between revised RST effects and adaptive emotion regulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100390922023-03-26 High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. Fink, Andreas Bauer, Jonathan F. Rominger, Christian Papousek, Ilona Curr Psychol Article This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quality of reappraisal ideas were correlated with BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity (RST-Personality Questionnaire). Results revealed that high BIS and high FFFS reduced the total number of reappraisal ideas, indicating that combined heightened sensitivity of the two avoidance systems may deplete individuals’ repertoire of potential reappraisals. RST effects on the quality of generated reappraisals were also found. High BIS and low BAS lowered individuals’ propensity to produce positive re-interpretations, which are considered a more adaptive reappraisal tactic. High FFFS sensitivity was linked to a lower preference for problem-oriented reappraisals. This study underlines that certain interactions of motivational subsystems may be particularly detrimental for successful reappraisal of anger-eliciting events. Our findings reveal potential links between revised RST effects and adaptive emotion regulation. Springer US 2021-05-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10039092/ /pubmed/36987512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. Fink, Andreas Bauer, Jonathan F. Rominger, Christian Papousek, Ilona High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title | High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title_full | High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title_fullStr | High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title_full_unstemmed | High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title_short | High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
title_sort | high avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perchtoldstefancorinnam highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger AT finkandreas highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger AT bauerjonathanf highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger AT romingerchristian highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger AT papousekilona highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger |