Cargando…

High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger

This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M., Fink, Andreas, Bauer, Jonathan F., Rominger, Christian, Papousek, Ilona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y
_version_ 1784912208317120512
author Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M.
Fink, Andreas
Bauer, Jonathan F.
Rominger, Christian
Papousek, Ilona
author_facet Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M.
Fink, Andreas
Bauer, Jonathan F.
Rominger, Christian
Papousek, Ilona
author_sort Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M.
collection PubMed
description This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quality of reappraisal ideas were correlated with BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity (RST-Personality Questionnaire). Results revealed that high BIS and high FFFS reduced the total number of reappraisal ideas, indicating that combined heightened sensitivity of the two avoidance systems may deplete individuals’ repertoire of potential reappraisals. RST effects on the quality of generated reappraisals were also found. High BIS and low BAS lowered individuals’ propensity to produce positive re-interpretations, which are considered a more adaptive reappraisal tactic. High FFFS sensitivity was linked to a lower preference for problem-oriented reappraisals. This study underlines that certain interactions of motivational subsystems may be particularly detrimental for successful reappraisal of anger-eliciting events. Our findings reveal potential links between revised RST effects and adaptive emotion regulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100390922023-03-26 High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. Fink, Andreas Bauer, Jonathan F. Rominger, Christian Papousek, Ilona Curr Psychol Article This study investigates the link between the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and individuals’ capacity to spontaneously invent alternate appraisals for aversive events. Eighty-two women completed the Reappraisal Inventiveness Test for anger-eliciting situations, and quantity and quality of reappraisal ideas were correlated with BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity (RST-Personality Questionnaire). Results revealed that high BIS and high FFFS reduced the total number of reappraisal ideas, indicating that combined heightened sensitivity of the two avoidance systems may deplete individuals’ repertoire of potential reappraisals. RST effects on the quality of generated reappraisals were also found. High BIS and low BAS lowered individuals’ propensity to produce positive re-interpretations, which are considered a more adaptive reappraisal tactic. High FFFS sensitivity was linked to a lower preference for problem-oriented reappraisals. This study underlines that certain interactions of motivational subsystems may be particularly detrimental for successful reappraisal of anger-eliciting events. Our findings reveal potential links between revised RST effects and adaptive emotion regulation. Springer US 2021-05-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10039092/ /pubmed/36987512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M.
Fink, Andreas
Bauer, Jonathan F.
Rominger, Christian
Papousek, Ilona
High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title_full High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title_fullStr High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title_full_unstemmed High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title_short High avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
title_sort high avoidance and low approach motivation affect cognitive reappraisal generation in the face of anger
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01917-y
work_keys_str_mv AT perchtoldstefancorinnam highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger
AT finkandreas highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger
AT bauerjonathanf highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger
AT romingerchristian highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger
AT papousekilona highavoidanceandlowapproachmotivationaffectcognitivereappraisalgenerationinthefaceofanger