Cargando…
Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study
BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act and the OpenNotes movement have brought patients immediate access to their electronic health records (EHRs). The experiences of marginalized people, including transgender people, accessing and reviewing their EHRs could inform documentation guidelines to improv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6 |
_version_ | 1784912221099261952 |
---|---|
author | Alpert, Ash B. Mehringer, Jamie E. Orta, Sunshine J. Redwood, Emile Hernandez, Tresne Rivers, Lexis Manzano, Charlie Ruddick, Roman Adams, Spencer Cerulli, Catherine Operario, Don Griggs, Jennifer J. |
author_facet | Alpert, Ash B. Mehringer, Jamie E. Orta, Sunshine J. Redwood, Emile Hernandez, Tresne Rivers, Lexis Manzano, Charlie Ruddick, Roman Adams, Spencer Cerulli, Catherine Operario, Don Griggs, Jennifer J. |
author_sort | Alpert, Ash B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act and the OpenNotes movement have brought patients immediate access to their electronic health records (EHRs). The experiences of marginalized people, including transgender people, accessing and reviewing their EHRs could inform documentation guidelines to improve patient-clinician rapport and reduce harm. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experiences of transgender people reviewing EHRs. DESIGN: Qualitative study using community-engaged research and an interpretive description methodology. Participants were recruited via social media, snowball sampling was employed, and purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity in terms of age, race/ethnicity, and other factors. In focus groups, participants were asked to discuss their experiences reviewing their EHRs and, for those participants who were clinicians, their experiences reviewing other clinicians’ documentation. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty transgender adults aged 20 to 67 years, including 10 clinicians. Approach: Digital audio-recordings of focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Content was analyzed to identify emerging essential elements and analysis was continued until no new themes emerged (i.e., saturation). KEY RESULTS: Four themes were noted. (1) Using the wrong name, pronoun, or gender marker for patients is common in the EHR, erodes trust, and causes trauma. (2) Various aspects of clinicians’ notes contradict, blame, or stigmatize patients, across multiple axes of oppression. (3) Limitations of EHR capabilities create barriers to quality care. (4) Certain medical customs set the stage for marginalizing, objectifying, and pathologizing transgender people. CONCLUSIONS: Transgender people experience harm via various aspects of EHR documentation, suggesting that changes must be made to improve patient-clinician relationships and reduce ill-effects for patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100392202023-03-26 Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study Alpert, Ash B. Mehringer, Jamie E. Orta, Sunshine J. Redwood, Emile Hernandez, Tresne Rivers, Lexis Manzano, Charlie Ruddick, Roman Adams, Spencer Cerulli, Catherine Operario, Don Griggs, Jennifer J. J Gen Intern Med Original Research: Qualitative Research BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act and the OpenNotes movement have brought patients immediate access to their electronic health records (EHRs). The experiences of marginalized people, including transgender people, accessing and reviewing their EHRs could inform documentation guidelines to improve patient-clinician rapport and reduce harm. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experiences of transgender people reviewing EHRs. DESIGN: Qualitative study using community-engaged research and an interpretive description methodology. Participants were recruited via social media, snowball sampling was employed, and purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity in terms of age, race/ethnicity, and other factors. In focus groups, participants were asked to discuss their experiences reviewing their EHRs and, for those participants who were clinicians, their experiences reviewing other clinicians’ documentation. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty transgender adults aged 20 to 67 years, including 10 clinicians. Approach: Digital audio-recordings of focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Content was analyzed to identify emerging essential elements and analysis was continued until no new themes emerged (i.e., saturation). KEY RESULTS: Four themes were noted. (1) Using the wrong name, pronoun, or gender marker for patients is common in the EHR, erodes trust, and causes trauma. (2) Various aspects of clinicians’ notes contradict, blame, or stigmatize patients, across multiple axes of oppression. (3) Limitations of EHR capabilities create barriers to quality care. (4) Certain medical customs set the stage for marginalizing, objectifying, and pathologizing transgender people. CONCLUSIONS: Transgender people experience harm via various aspects of EHR documentation, suggesting that changes must be made to improve patient-clinician relationships and reduce ill-effects for patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-31 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10039220/ /pubmed/35641720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research: Qualitative Research Alpert, Ash B. Mehringer, Jamie E. Orta, Sunshine J. Redwood, Emile Hernandez, Tresne Rivers, Lexis Manzano, Charlie Ruddick, Roman Adams, Spencer Cerulli, Catherine Operario, Don Griggs, Jennifer J. Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title | Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title_full | Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title_short | Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study |
title_sort | experiences of transgender people reviewing their electronic health records, a qualitative study |
topic | Original Research: Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alpertashb experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT mehringerjamiee experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT ortasunshinej experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT redwoodemile experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT hernandeztresne experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT riverslexis experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT manzanocharlie experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT ruddickroman experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT adamsspencer experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT cerullicatherine experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT operariodon experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy AT griggsjenniferj experiencesoftransgenderpeoplereviewingtheirelectronichealthrecordsaqualitativestudy |